Talk:Michael Wharton

This article is ratedStart-classon Wikipedia'scontent assessmentscale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope ofWikiProject University of Oxford,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theUniversity of Oxfordon Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale.
	This article has beenautomatically ratedby abotor other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the`\|auto=`parameter.

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofPolitics of the United Kingdomon Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has beenautomatically ratedby abotor other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the`\|auto=`parameter.

Biography

This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Biography,a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited tojoin the projectandcontribute to the discussion.For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Journalism,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofjournalismon Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale.

Style

"[The] obituary pursued the same thread to an even more precipitous minefield". A thoroughlymixed metaphor.Leibniz 08:01, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No proof

The "Guardian's" claim that Wharton was a Nazi is not substatiated by any quotations.

I have removed this quote. As you say, it gives no quotes or support. Such a grave allegation should be supported with actual evidence.120.17.31.93(talk)01:28, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The quotation from the Guardian didnotsay that he was a Nazi, as claimed in the first paragraph above. It was more nuanced than that. As a properly cited quote from a major newspaper, I don't think it should have been removed. I was a regular reader of Wharton's column. Though I greatly enjoyed his writing, his apparent sympathy for Nazi Germany made me very uncomfortable. It seemed at times as though his hatred of Communism was so strong, that almost anything that was anti-Communist would meet with his approval. JH (talk page)09:06, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of balance

This article is somewhat unbalanced by undue coverage of attacks on him by those who were his political enemies, and attempts to smear him by association with doubtful friends. He was a very well-loved eccentric, and his attacks on busy-bodies and trendies were always liable to be taken amiss by busy-bodies and trendies. I have lots of doubts that a few dubious claims by BNP people (in their own interests) deserve the huge proportion of the article that they occupy. Even the Guardian obituary is more balanced. Not sure how to rebalance it, tho. Roger Pearse 16:15, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Restoring Objectivity

A step forward would be to remove the two defamatory paragraphs (Allegations of racism, Alleged support for BNP) until a more reasoned text can be arrived at. With these in place the article commits the elementary sin of attributing attitudes expressed in his satirical columns to Wharton personally. Worse he is damned by association, with no reliable evidence, with the lunatic fringe of his readers. A fair assessment of Wharton's work would consider the extent to which he shared the controversial opinions of his characters and more volatile readers, not blindly assume they are one and the same. That said, I can't help feeling that Wharton would be grimly amused by theReductio ad Hitlerumparagraphs in the current draft.Ahumphr(talk)09:42, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good piece on Wharton

There'a a good article about him in today'sDaily Telegraphby his daughter, Jane. It doesn't seem to be on their website yet, but I imagine that it will be before long. JH (talk page)09:02, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's a good piece in today'sTelegraphby Harry Mount, marking the fact that his 100th birthday would have been yesterday:"Michael Wharton: The man who foresaw the way of the world".JH (talk page)09:23, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion perTemplate:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions atTemplate:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! --Khazar2(talk)01:27, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link onMichael Wharton.Please take a moment to reviewmy edit.If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQfor additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018,"External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot.No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verificationusing the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permissionto delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfCbefore doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)00:13, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]