Jump to content

Talk:Naina Yeltsina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notable?

[edit]

I see this was created only today. Why does she deserve an article now, just because her husband is dead? --dllu16:54, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because she is asubject of multiple non-trivial, indepenent publications.Just give this stub some time, and do notBITE!MaxSem17:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I can understand that some editors make merger proposals, but to tag this article for deletion (non-notablitity) is not very constructive.Camptown15:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ten years in, I agree that she has no independent notability, and that her page ought to be merged into his.Valetude(talk)13:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

[edit]
The main discussion is taking place at the Boris talk page per the convention built into the template. --Ynot?15:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support- I agree that this topic, as it currently stands, should be merged into Boris' page. --Kukinihablame aqui05:15, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose,This request is far too premature. Why shouldn't the first First Lady of Russia deserve her own page?Camptown14:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support- I also think it should be merged!SuperzoharTalk18:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Opposemerge. --Petri Krohn22:15, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose.Wikipedia has plenty of articles about first ladies, many of them much less notable per se.Colchicum22:41, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And a full biography of her woudn't be appropriate here.Colchicum22:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose.As first lady she deserved a separate article, like othersBiophys13:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Very strongly oppose- but will change my vote if you agree to deleteHillary Clinton,Laura Bush,and every other American First Lady. If American First Ladies are worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, why not Russian First Ladies? "Notability" DOES NOT confine itself to theAnglosphere.David Cannon14:21, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, snap... I was sure it's only in the Anglosphere... hmmm... --Ynot?16:30, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose.I agree that as a First Lady she deserves to have her own biography. A link from Boris Yeltsin's page is sufficient.melanieness18:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose.IfMartha Washingtoncan have an article, then the 1st First Lady of the Russian Federation, should as well.GoodDay18:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why the a

[edit]

Why does her name end with an a, Yeltina, is this something Russian or a typo?

SeeRussian name#Family name (surname).MaxSem21:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link onNaina Yeltsina.Please take a moment to reviewmy edit.If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQfor additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018,"External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot.No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verificationusing the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permissionto delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfCbefore doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)13:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]