Talk:SSE4

	This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Computing,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcomputers,computing,andinformation technologyon Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated asMid-importanceon theproject's importance scale.
	This article is supported byWikiProject Software(assessed asLow-importance).
	This article is supported byComputer hardware task force(assessed asLow-importance).

[Untitled]

I removed the redirect to the SSSE3 talk page. SSE4 is different from SSSE3.

SSE4 talk at IDF Beijing 2007 revealed everything; I'm filling in the tables nowFivemack 15:09, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's strictly true that POPCNT shares the opcode for the x86-on-ia64 JMPE. It depends on how you define "opcode" I guess. POPCNT has a mandatory F3 prefix, which differentiates it from JMPE.

POPCNT has it's own primay opcode, those two instructions simply share the same mandatory prefix. I'm studying this vigorously, so I had to say something.ChazZeromus(talk)16:36, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HD Boost SSSE4

> Intel is using the marketing term HD Boost to refer to SSE4.

link is dead/redirects to home page. google shows no reference. Seems this statement is invalid now. guessing intel changed everything wrt it.— Precedingunsignedcomment added by74.84.235.22(talk)21:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

register length in bits

This article does not says how long are the registers. Probably 128 bits.181.118.72.35(talk)17:56, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About Windows 11 24H2

The article says that Windows 11 24H2 requires the CPU to support POPCNT and LZCNT, but I couldn't find any mention of LZCNT in the sources mentioned. I think it might be a factual error.2A02:2F0E:A14:B900:C88A:D5DC:B2EC:9722(talk)23:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]