Jump to content

Time travel

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The first page ofThe Time Machinepublished byHeinemann

Time travelis the hypothetical activity of traveling into thepastorfuture.Time travel is a widely recognized concept inphilosophyandfiction,particularlyscience fiction.In fiction,time travel is typically achieved through the use of a hypothetical device known as atime machine.The idea of a time machine was popularized byH. G. Wells's 1895 novelThe Time Machine.[1]

It is uncertain whether time travel to the past would be physically possible. Such travel, if at all feasible, may give rise to questions ofcausality.Forward time travel, outside the usual sense of theperception of time,is an extensively observed phenomenon and is well understood within the framework ofspecial relativityandgeneral relativity.However, making one body advance or delay more than a few milliseconds compared to another body is not feasible with current technology. As for backward time travel, it is possible to findsolutions in general relativitythat allow for it, such as a rotatingblack hole.Traveling to an arbitrary point in spacetime has very limited support intheoretical physics,and is usually connected only withquantum mechanicsorwormholes.

History of the concept

Mythical time travel

Statue ofRip Van WinkleinIrvington, New York

Some ancient mythsdepict a character skipping forward in time.In Hindu mythology, theVishnu Puranamentions the story of King RaivataKakudmi,who travels to heaven to meet the creatorBrahmaand is surprised to learn when he returns to Earth that many ages have passed.[2][3]The BuddhistPāli Canonmentions the relativity of time. ThePayasiSutta tells of one of theBuddha's chief disciples, KumaraKassapa,who explains to the skeptic Payasi that time in the Heavens passes differently than on Earth.[4]The Japanese tale of "Urashima Tarō",[5]first described in theManyoshutells of a young fisherman named Urashima-no-ko ( phổ 嶋 tử ) who visits an undersea palace. After three days, he returns home to his village and finds himself 300 years in the future, where he has been forgotten, his house is in ruins, and his family has died.[6]InJewishtradition, the 1st-century BC scholarHoni ha-M'agelis said to have fallen asleep and slept for seventy years. When waking up he returned home but found none of the people he knew, and no one believed his claims of who he was.[7]

Abrahamic religions

InIslam,theQurannarrates the story of theSeven Sleepers,a group of monotheistic young men who sought refuge in a cave to escape persecution. As they slept,Allahpreserved them for centuries, and when they awoke they discovered a changed world. This narrative, found in the Quranic SurahAl-Kahf,describes divine protection and time suspension.[8][9][10]The story of the Seven Sleepers appears in a myth of theChristianreligion, in which a group of young men were seeking to escapeRoman persecution.Rome was a polytheistic empire at the time.[11][12]

In another story from Islam,Uzair(often identified with the BiblicalEzra) experienced profound grief at theBabylonian destruction of Jerusalem.It is said that God took his soul and restored him to life after the city's reconstruction. Upon returning to his hometown, he went unrecognized by the people and his household, except for an elderly maid, who, once blind, regained her sight through his prayers. During this reunion, Uzair also encountered his son, who, despite aging beyond him, recognized his father.[13][14]

Shift to science fiction

Time travel themes inscience fictionand the media can be grouped into three categories: immutable timeline; mutable timeline; and alternate histories, as in the interacting-many-worlds interpretation.[15][16][17]The non-scientific termtimelineis often used to refer to all physical events in history, so that where events are changed, the time traveler is described as creating a new timeline.[18]

Early science fiction stories feature characters who sleep for years and awaken in a changed society, or are transported to the past through supernatural means. Among themL'An 2440, rêve s'il en fût jamais(The Year 2440: A Dream If Ever There Was One,1770) byLouis-Sébastien Mercier,Rip Van Winkle(1819) byWashington Irving,Looking Backward(1888) byEdward Bellamy,andWhen the Sleeper Awakes(1899) by H. G. Wells. Prolonged sleep, like the later more familiartime machine,is used as a means of time travel in these stories.[19]

The date of the earliest work about backwards time travel is uncertain. The Chinese novelSupplement to the Journey to the West(c. 1640) by Dong Yue features magical mirrors and jade gateways that connect various points in time. The protagonistSun Wukongtravels back in time to the "World of the Ancients" (Qin dynasty) to retrieve a magical bell and then travels forward to the "World of the Future" (Song dynasty) to find an emperor who has been exiled in time. However, the time travel is taking place inside an illusory dream world created by the villain to distract and entrap him.[20]Samuel Madden'sMemoirs of the Twentieth Century(1733) is a series of letters from British ambassadors in 1997 and 1998 to diplomats in the past, conveying the political and religious conditions of the future.[21]: 95–96 Because the narrator receives these letters from hisguardian angel,Paul Alkon suggests in his bookOrigins of Futuristic Fictionthat "the first time-traveler in English literature is a guardian angel".[21]: 85 Madden does not explain how the angel obtains these documents, but Alkon asserts that Madden "deserves recognition as the first to toy with the rich idea of time-travel in the form of an artifact sent backward from the future to be discovered in the present".[21]: 95–96 In the science fiction anthologyFar Boundaries(1951), editorAugust Derlethclaims that an early short story about time travel isAn Anachronism; or, Missing One's Coach,written for theDublin Literary Magazine[22]by an anonymous author in theJune 1838 issue.[23]: 3 While the narrator waits under a tree for acoachto take him out ofNewcastle upon Tyne,he is transported back in time over a thousand years. He encounters the VenerableBedein amonasteryand explains to him the developments of the coming centuries. However, the story never makes it clear whether these events are real or a dream.[23]: 11–38 Another early work about time travel isThe Forebears of Kalimeros: Alexander, son of Philip of MacedonbyAlexander Veltmanpublished in 1836.[24]

Mr. and Mrs. Fezziwig dance in a vision shown to Scrooge by theGhost of Christmas Past.

Charles Dickens'sA Christmas Carol(1843) has early depictions of mystical time travel in both directions, as the protagonist, Ebenezer Scrooge, is transported to Christmases past and future. Other stories employ the same template, where a character naturally goes to sleep, and upon waking up finds him or her self in a different time.[25]A clearer example of backward time travel is found in the popular 1861 bookParis avant les hommes(Paris before Men) by the French botanist and geologistPierre Boitard,published posthumously. In this story, the protagonist is transported to the prehistoric past by the magic of a "lame demon" (a French pun on Boitard's name), where he encounters aPlesiosaurand an apelike ancestor and is able to interact with ancient creatures.[26]Edward Everett Hale's "Hands Off" (1881)[27]tells the story of an unnamed being, possibly the soul of a person who has recently died, who interferes with ancient Egyptian history by preventingJoseph's enslavement. This may have been the first story to feature analternate historycreated as a result of time travel.[28]: 54 

Early time machines

One of the first stories to feature time travel by means of a machine is "The Clock that Went Backward"byEdward Page Mitchell,[29]which appeared in theNew York Sunin 1881. However, the mechanism borders on fantasy. An unusual clock, when wound, runs backwards and transports people nearby back in time. The author does not explain the origin or properties of the clock.[28]: 55 Enrique Gaspar y Rimbau'sEl Anacronópete(1887) may have been the first story to feature a vessel engineered to travel through time.[30][31]Andrew Sawyerhas commented that the story "does seem to be the first literary description of a time machine noted so far", adding that "Edward Page Mitchell's storyThe Clock That Went Backward(1881) is usually described as the first time-machine story, but I'm not sure that a clock quite counts ".[32]H. G. Wells'The Time Machine(1895) popularized the concept of time travel by mechanical means.[33]

Time travel in physics

Some theories, most notablyspecialandgeneral relativity,suggest that suitable geometries ofspacetimeor specific types of motion inspacemight allow time travel into the past and future if these geometries or motions were possible.[34]: 499 In technical papers,physicistsdiscuss the possibility ofclosed timelike curves,which areworld linesthat form closed loops in spacetime, allowing objects to return to their own past. There are known to be solutions to the equations of general relativity that describe spacetimes which contain closed timelike curves, such asGödel spacetime,but the physical plausibility of these solutions is uncertain.

Many in the scientific community believe that backward time travel is highly unlikely to be possible. Any theory that would allow time travel would introduce potential problems ofcausality.[35]The classic example of a problem involving causality is the "grandfather paradox,"which postulates travelling to the past and intervening in the conception of one's ancestors (causing the death of an ancestor before conception being frequently cited). Some physicists, such as Novikov and Deutsch, suggested that these sorts oftemporal paradoxescan be avoided through theNovikov self-consistency principleor a variation of themany-worlds interpretationwith interacting worlds.[36]

General relativity

Time travel to the past is theoretically possible in certain general relativity spacetime geometries that permit travelingfaster than the speed of light,such ascosmic strings,traversablewormholes,andAlcubierre drives.[37][38]: 33–130 The theory ofgeneral relativitydoes suggest a scientific basis for the possibility of backward time travel in certain unusual scenarios, although arguments fromsemiclassical gravitysuggest that whenquantumeffects are incorporated into general relativity, these loopholes may be closed.[39]These semiclassical arguments ledStephen Hawkingto formulate thechronology protection conjecture,suggesting that the fundamental laws of nature prevent time travel,[40]but physicists cannot come to a definitive judgment on the issue without a theory ofquantum gravityto join quantum mechanics and general relativity into a completely unified theory.[41][42]: 150 

Different spacetime geometries

The theory ofgeneral relativitydescribes the universe under a system offield equationsthat determine themetric,or distance function, of spacetime. There exist exact solutions to these equations that includeclosed time-like curves,which areworld linesthat intersect themselves; some point in the causal future of the world line is also in its causal past, a situation that can be described as time travel. Such a solution was first proposed byKurt Gödel,a solution known as theGödel metric,but his (and others') solution requires the universe to have physical characteristics that it does not appear to have,[34]: 499 such asrotationand lack ofHubble expansion.Whether general relativity forbids closed time-like curves for all realistic conditions is still being researched.[43]

Wormholes

Wormholes are a hypothetical warped spacetime permitted by theEinstein field equationsof general relativity.[44]: 100 A proposed time-travel machine using atraversable wormholewould hypothetically work in the following way: One end of the wormhole is accelerated to some significant fraction of the speed of light, perhaps with some advancedpropulsion system,and then brought back to the point of origin. Alternatively, another way is to take one entrance of the wormhole and move it to within the gravitational field of an object that has higher gravity than the other entrance, and then return it to a position near the other entrance. For both these methods,time dilationcauses the end of the wormhole that has been moved to have aged less, or become "younger", than the stationary end as seen by an external observer; however, time connects differentlythroughthe wormhole thanoutsideit, so thatsynchronizedclocks at either end of the wormhole will always remain synchronized as seen by an observer passing through the wormhole, no matter how the two ends move around.[34]: 502 This means that an observer entering the "younger" end would exit the "older" end at a time when it was the same age as the "younger" end, effectively going back in time as seen by an observer from the outside. One significant limitation of such a time machine is that it is only possible to go as far back in time as the initial creation of the machine;[34]: 503 in essence, it is more of a path through time than it is a device that itself moves through time, and it would not allow the technology itself to be moved backward in time.

According to current theories on the nature of wormholes, construction of a traversable wormhole would require the existence of a substance withnegative energy,often referred to as "exotic matter".More technically, the wormhole spacetime requires a distribution of energy that violates variousenergy conditions,such as the null energy condition along with the weak, strong, and dominant energy conditions. However, it is known that quantum effects can lead to small measurable violations of the null energy condition,[44]: 101 and many physicists believe that the required negative energy may actually be possible due to theCasimir effectin quantum physics.[45]Although early calculations suggested that a very large amount of negative energy would be required, later calculations showed that the amount of negative energy can be made arbitrarily small.[46]

In 1993,Matt Visserargued that the two mouths of a wormhole with such an induced clock difference could not be brought together without inducing quantum field and gravitational effects that would either make the wormhole collapse or the two mouths repel each other.[47]Because of this, the two mouths could not be brought close enough forcausalityviolation to take place. However, in a 1997 paper, Visser hypothesized that a complex "Roman ring"(named after Tom Roman) configuration of an N number of wormholes arranged in a symmetric polygon could still act as a time machine, although he concludes that this is more likely a flaw in classical quantum gravity theory rather than proof that causality violation is possible.[48]

Other approaches based on general relativity

Another approach involves a dense spinning cylinder usually referred to as aTipler cylinder,a GR solution discovered byWillem Jacob van Stockum[49]in 1936 andKornel Lanczos[50]in 1924, but not recognized as allowing closed timelike curves[51]: 21 until an analysis byFrank Tipler[52]in 1974. If a cylinder is infinitely long and spins fast enough about its long axis, then a spaceship flying around the cylinder on a spiral path could travel back in time (or forward, depending on the direction of its spiral). However, the density and speed required is so great that ordinary matter is not strong enough to construct it. PhysicistRonald Mallettis attempting to recreate the conditions of a rotating black hole with ring lasers, in order to bend spacetime and allow for time travel.[53]

A more fundamental objection to time travel schemes based on rotating cylinders or cosmic strings has been put forward by Stephen Hawking, who proved a theorem showing that according to general relativity it is impossible to build a time machine of a special type (a "time machine with the compactly generated Cauchy horizon" ) in a region where theweak energy conditionis satisfied, meaning that the region contains no matter with negative energy density (exotic matter). Solutions such as Tipler's assume cylinders of infinite length, which are easier to analyze mathematically, and although Tipler suggested that a finite cylinder might produce closed timelike curves if the rotation rate were fast enough,[51]: 169 he did not prove this. But Hawking points out that because of his theorem, "it can't be done with positive energy density everywhere! I can prove that to build a finite time machine, you need negative energy."[42]: 96 This result comes from Hawking's 1992 paper on thechronology protection conjecture,which Hawking states as "The laws of physics do not allow the appearance of closed timelike curves."[40]

Quantum physics

No-communication theorem

When a signal is sent from one location and received at another location, then as long as the signal is moving at the speed of light or slower, the mathematics ofsimultaneityin the theory of relativity show that all reference frames agree that the transmission-event happened before the reception-event. When the signal travels faster than light, it is receivedbeforeit is sent, in all reference frames.[54]The signal could be said to have moved backward in time. This hypothetical scenario is sometimes referred to as atachyonic antitelephone.[55]

Quantum-mechanical phenomena such asquantum teleportation,theEPR paradox,orquantum entanglementmight appear to create a mechanism that allows for faster-than-light (FTL) communication or time travel, and in fact some interpretations of quantum mechanics such as theBohm interpretationpresume that some information is being exchanged between particles instantaneously in order to maintain correlations between particles.[56]This effect was referred to as "spooky action at a distance"by Einstein.

Nevertheless, the fact that causality is preserved in quantum mechanics is a rigorous result in modernquantum field theories,and therefore modern theories do not allow for time travel orFTL communication.In any specific instance where FTL has been claimed, more detailed analysis has proven that to get a signal, some form of classical communication must also be used.[57]Theno-communication theoremalso gives a general proof that quantum entanglement cannot be used to transmit information faster than classical signals.

Interacting many-worlds interpretation

A variation ofHugh Everett'smany-worlds interpretation(MWI) of quantum mechanics provides a resolution to the grandfather paradox that involves the time traveler arriving in a different universe than the one they came from; it's been argued that since the traveler arrives in a different universe's history and not their own history, this is not "genuine" time travel.[58]The accepted many-worlds interpretation suggests that all possible quantum events can occur in mutually exclusive histories.[59]However, some variations allow different universes to interact. This concept is most often used in science-fiction, but some physicists such asDavid Deutschhave suggested that a time traveler should end up in a different history than the one he started from.[60][61]On the other hand, Stephen Hawking has argued that even if the MWI is correct, we should expect each time traveler to experience a single self-consistent history, so that time travelers remain within their own world rather than traveling to a different one.[62]The physicist Allen Everett argued that Deutsch's approach "involves modifying fundamental principles of quantum mechanics; it certainly goes beyond simply adopting the MWI". Everett also argues that even if Deutsch's approach is correct, it would imply that any macroscopic object composed of multiple particles would be split apart when traveling back in time through a wormhole, with different particles emerging in different worlds.[36]

Experimental results

Certain experiments carried out give the impression of reversedcausality,but fail to show it under closer examination.

Thedelayed-choice quantum eraserexperiment performed byMarlan Scullyinvolves pairs ofentangledphotonsthat are divided into "signal photons" and "idler photons", with the signal photons emerging from one of two locations and their position later measured as in thedouble-slit experiment.Depending on how the idler photon is measured, the experimenter can either learn which of the two locations the signal photon emerged from or "erase" that information. Even though the signal photons can be measured before the choice has been made about the idler photons, the choice seems to retroactively determine whether or not aninterference patternis observed when one correlates measurements of idler photons to the corresponding signal photons. However, since interference can be observed only after the idler photons are measured and they are correlated with the signal photons, there is no way for experimenters to tell what choice will be made in advance just by looking at the signal photons, only by gathering classical information from the entire system; thus causality is preserved.[63]

The experiment of Lijun Wang might also show causality violation since it made it possible to send packages of waves through a bulb of caesium gas in such a way that the package appeared to exit the bulb 62 nanoseconds before its entry, but a wave package is not a single well-defined object but rather a sum of multiple waves of different frequencies (seeFourier analysis), and the package can appear to move faster than light or even backward in time even if none of the pure waves in the sum do so. This effect cannot be used to send any matter, energy, or information faster than light,[64]so this experiment is understood not to violate causality either.

The physicistsGünter Nimtzand Alfons Stahlhofen, of theUniversity of Koblenz,claim to have violated Einstein's theory of relativity by transmitting photons faster than the speed of light. They say they have conducted an experiment in whichmicrowavephotons traveled "instantaneously" between a pair of prisms that had been moved up to 3 ft (0.91 m) apart, using a phenomenon known asquantum tunneling.Nimtz toldNew Scientistmagazine: "For the time being, this is the only violation of special relativity that I know of." However, other physicists say that this phenomenon does not allow information to be transmitted faster than light.Aephraim M. Steinberg,a quantum optics expert at theUniversity of Toronto,Canada, uses the analogy of a train traveling from Chicago to New York, but dropping off train cars at each station along the way, so that the center of the train moves forward at each stop; in this way, the speed of the center of the train exceeds the speed of any of the individual cars.[65]

Shengwang Duclaims in a peer-reviewed journal to have observed single photons'precursors,saying that they travel no faster thancin a vacuum. His experiment involvedslow lightas well as passing light through a vacuum. He generated two singlephotons,passing one throughrubidiumatoms that had been cooled with a laser (thus slowing the light) and passing one through a vacuum. Both times, apparently, the precursors preceded the photons' main bodies, and the precursor traveled atcin a vacuum. According to Du, this implies that there is no possibility of light traveling faster thancand, thus, no possibility of violating causality.[66]

Absence of time travelers from the future

Many have argued that the absence of time travelers from the future demonstrates that such technology will never be developed, suggesting that it is impossible. This is analogous to theFermi paradoxrelated to the absence of evidence of extraterrestrial life. As the absence of extraterrestrial visitors does not categoricallyprovethey do not exist, so the absence of time travelers fails to prove time travel is physically impossible; it might be that time travel is physically possible but is never developed or is cautiously used.Carl Saganonce suggested the possibility that time travelers could be here but are disguising their existence or are not recognized as time travelers.[41]Some versions of general relativity suggest that time travel might only be possible in a region ofspacetimethat is warped a certain way,[clarification needed]and hence time travelers would not be able to travel back to earlier regions in spacetime, before this region existed.Stephen Hawkingstated that this would explain why the world has not already been overrun by "tourists from the future".[62]

Advertisement placed in a 1980 edition ofArtforum,advertising the Krononauts event

Several experiments have been carried out to try to entice future humans, who might invent time travel technology, to come back and demonstrate it to people of the present time. Events such as Perth'sDestination DayorMIT'sTime Traveler Conventionheavily publicized permanent "advertisements" of a meeting time and place for future time travelers to meet.[67]In 1982, a group inBaltimore,Maryland,identifying itself as the Krononauts, hosted an event of this type welcoming visitors from the future.[68][69]These experiments only stood the possibility of generating a positive result demonstrating the existence of time travel, but have failed so far—no time travelers are known to have attended either event. Some versions of themany-worlds interpretationcan be used to suggest that future humans have traveled back in time, but have traveled back to the meeting time and place in aparallel universe.[70]

Time dilation

Transversal time dilation. The blue dots represent a pulse of light. Each pair of dots with light "bouncing" between them is a clock. For each group of clocks, the other group appears to be ticking more slowly, because the moving clock's light pulse has to travel a larger distance than the stationary clock's light pulse. That is so, even though the clocks are identical and their relative motion is perfectly reciprocal.

There is a great deal of observable evidence for time dilation in special relativity[71]and gravitational time dilation in general relativity,[72][73][74]for example in the famous and easy-to-replicate observation ofatmospheric muon decay.[75][76][77]The theory of relativity states that thespeed of lightisinvariantfor all observers in anyframe of reference;that is, it is always the same. Time dilation is a direct consequence of the invariance of the speed of light.[77]Time dilation may be regarded in a limited sense as "time travel into the future": a person may use time dilation so that a small amount ofproper timepasses for them, while a large amount of proper time passes elsewhere. This can be achieved by traveling atrelativistic speedsor through the effects ofgravity.[78]

For two identical clocks moving relative to each other without accelerating, each clock measures the other to be ticking slower. This is possible due to therelativity of simultaneity.However, the symmetry is broken if one clock accelerates, allowing for less proper time to pass for one clock than the other. Thetwin paradoxdescribes this: one twin remains on Earth, while the other undergoes acceleration torelativistic speedas they travel into space, turn around, and travel back to Earth; the traveling twin ages less than the twin who stayed on Earth, because of the time dilation experienced during their acceleration. General relativity treats the effects of acceleration and the effects of gravity asequivalent,and shows that time dilation also occurs ingravity wells,with a clock deeper in the well ticking more slowly; this effect is taken into account when calibrating the clocks on the satellites of theGlobal Positioning System,and it could lead to significant differences in rates of aging for observers at different distances from a large gravity well such as ablack hole.[38]: 33–130 

A time machine that utilizes this principle might be, for instance, a spherical shell with a diameter of five meters and themass of Jupiter.A person at its center will travel forward in time at a rate four times slower than that of distant observers. Squeezing the mass of a large planet into such a small structure is not expected to be within humanity's technological capabilities in the near future.[38]: 76–140 With current technologies, it is only possible to cause a human traveler to age less than companions on Earth by a few milliseconds after a few hundred days of space travel.[79]

Philosophy

Philosophers have discussed thephilosophy of space and timesince at least the time ofancient Greece;for example,Parmenidespresented the view that time is an illusion. Centuries later,Isaac Newtonsupported the idea ofabsolute time,while his contemporaryGottfried Wilhelm Leibnizmaintained that time is only a relation between events and it cannot be expressed independently. The latter approach eventually gave rise to thespacetimeofrelativity.[80]

Presentism vs. eternalism

Many philosophers have argued that relativity implieseternalism,the idea that the past and future exist in a real sense, not only as changes that occurred or will occur to the present.[81]Philosopher of scienceDean Ricklesdisagrees with some qualifications, but notes that "the consensus among philosophers seems to be that special and general relativity are incompatible with presentism".[82]Some philosophers view time as a dimension equal to spatial dimensions, that future events are "already there" in the same sense different places exist, and that there is no objective flow of time; however, this view is disputed.[83]

Presentismis a school of philosophy that holds that the future and the past exist only as changes that occurred or will occur to the present, and they have no real existence of their own. In this view, time travel is impossible because there is no future or past to travel to.[81]Keller and Nelson have argued that even if past and future objects do not exist, there can still be definite truths about past and future events, and thus it is possible that a future truth about a time traveler deciding to travel back to the present date could explain the time traveler's actual appearance in the present;[84]these views are contested by some authors.[85]

The grandfather paradox

A common objection to the idea of traveling back in time is put forth in the grandfather paradox or the argument of auto-infanticide.[86]If one were able to go back in time, inconsistencies and contradictions would ensue if the time traveler were to change anything; there is a contradiction if the past becomes different from the way itis.[87][88]The paradox is commonly described with a person who travels to the past and kills their own grandfather, prevents the existence of their father or mother, and therefore their own existence.[41]Philosophers question whether these paradoxes prove time travel impossible. Some philosophers answer these paradoxes by arguing that it might be the case that backward time travel could be possible but that it would be impossible to actuallychangethe past in any way,[89]an idea similar to the proposedNovikov self-consistency principlein physics.

Ontological paradox

Compossibility

According to the philosophical theory ofcompossibility,whatcanhappen, for example in the context of time travel, must be weighed against the context of everything relating to the situation. If the pastisa certain way, it's not possible for it to be any other way. Whatcanhappen when a time traveler visits the past is limited to whatdidhappen, in order to prevent logical contradictions.[90]

Self-consistency principle

TheNovikov self-consistency principle,named afterIgor Dmitrievich Novikov,states that any actions taken by a time traveler or by an object that travels back in time were part of history all along, and therefore it is impossible for the time traveler to "change" history in any way. The time traveler's actions may be thecauseof events in their own past though, which leads to the potential forcircular causation,sometimes called a predestination paradox,[91]ontological paradox,[92]or bootstrap paradox.[92][93]The term bootstrap paradox was popularized byRobert A. Heinlein's story "By His Bootstraps".[94]The Novikov self-consistency principle proposes that the local laws of physics in a region of spacetime containing time travelers cannot be any different from the local laws of physics in any other region of spacetime.[95]

The philosopher Kelley L. Ross argues in "Time Travel Paradoxes"[96]that in a scenario involving a physical object whose world-line or history forms a closed loop in time there can be a violation of thesecond law of thermodynamics.Ross uses the filmSomewhere in Timeas an example of such an ontological paradox, where a watch is given to a person, and 60 years later the same watch is brought back in time and given to the same character. Ross states thatentropyof the watch will increase, and the watch carried back in time will be more worn with each repetition of its history. The second law of thermodynamics is understood by modern physicists to be astatisticallaw, sodecreasing entropy and non-increasing entropyare not impossible, just improbable. Additionally, entropy statistically increases in systems which are isolated, so non-isolated systems, such as an object, that interact with the outside world, can become less worn and decrease in entropy, and it's possible for an object whose world-line forms a closed loop to be always in the same condition in the same point of its history.[38]: 23 

In 2005, Daniel Greenberger andKarl Svozilproposed thatquantum theorygives a model for time travel where the past must be self-consistent.[97][98]

See also

Further reading

References

  1. ^Cheng, John (2012).Astounding Wonder: Imagining Science and Science Fiction in Interwar America(illustrated ed.). University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 180.ISBN978-0-8122-0667-8.Archivedfrom the original on March 24, 2023.RetrievedNovember 18,2019.Extract of page 180Archived2023-03-24 at theWayback Machine
  2. ^Dowson, John (1879),"Revati",A classical dictionary of Hindu mythology and religion, geography, history, and literature,Routledge,archivedfrom the original on September 7, 2017,retrievedAugust 20,2009
  3. ^The Vishnu Purana: Book IV: Chapter I,archivedfrom the original on May 27, 2022,retrievedJanuary 8,2022
  4. ^Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya(1964),Indian Philosophy(7 ed.), People's Publishing House, New Delhi
  5. ^Yorke, Christopher (February 2006)."Malchronia: Cryonics and Bionics as Primitive Weapons in the War on Time".Journal of Evolution and Technology.15(1): 73–85.Archivedfrom the original on May 16, 2006.RetrievedAugust 29,2009.
  6. ^Rosenberg, Donna (1997).Folklore, myths, and legends: a world perspective.McGraw-Hill.p. 421.ISBN978-0-8442-5780-8.
  7. ^"בבלי - מסכת תענית פרק ג".mechon-mamre.org.Archivedfrom the original on December 29, 2022.RetrievedDecember 29,2022.
  8. ^Yahya, Farouk (December 5, 2022). "Talismans with the Names of the Seven Sleepers of Ephesus/Aṣḥāb al-Kahf in Muslim Southeast Asia".Chapter 8 Talismans with the Names of the Seven Sleepers of Ephesus/Aṣḥāb al-Kahf in Muslim Southeast Asia.Malay-Indonesian Islamic Studies. pp. 209–265.doi:10.1163/9789004529397_010.ISBN978-90-04-52939-7.RetrievedDecember 7,2023.{{cite book}}:|website=ignored (help)
  9. ^"Cave of the Seven Sleepers".Madain Project.RetrievedDecember 7,2023.
  10. ^Blakeley, Sasha (April 24, 2023)."The Seven Sleepers".Study.RetrievedDecember 7,2023.
  11. ^"The Cave of the Seven Sleepers in al-Rajib: A Co-Produced Christian-Muslim Site of Veneration".Coproduced Religions.
  12. ^Benko, Stephhen (1986).Pagan Rome and the Early Christians, Indiana University Press.ISBN978-0253203854
  13. ^Renda, G'nsel (1978)."The Miniatures of the Zubdat Al- Tawarikh".Turkish Treasures Culture /Art / Tourism Magazine.
  14. ^Ibn Kathir, Stories of the Prophets, translated by Shaikh muhammed Mustafa Gemeiah, Office of the Grand Imam, Sheikh al-Azhar, El-Nour Publishing, Egypt, 1997, Ch.21, pp.322-4
  15. ^Grey, William (1999). "Troubles with Time Travel".Philosophy.74(1). Cambridge University Press: 55–70.doi:10.1017/S0031819199001047.S2CID170218026.
  16. ^Rickman, Gregg (2004).The Science Fiction Film Reader.Limelight Editions.ISBN978-0-87910-994-3.
  17. ^Schneider, Susan (2009).Science Fiction and Philosophy: From Time Travel to Superintelligence.Wiley-Blackwell.ISBN978-1-4051-4907-5.
  18. ^Prucher, Jeff.Brave new words.ISBN978-0-19-530567-8.Archivedfrom the original on March 24, 2023.RetrievedDecember 29,2022.
  19. ^Peter Fitting (2010), "Utopia, dystopia, and science fiction", in Gregory Claeys (ed.),The Cambridge Companion to Utopian Literature,Cambridge University Press, pp. 138–139
  20. ^Dong, Yue; Wu, Chengẻn (2000).The Tower of Myriad Mirrors: A Supplement to Journey to the West.Michigan classics in Chinese studies. Translated by Lin, Shuen-fu; Schulz, Larry James (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, The University of Michigan.ISBN9780892641420.
  21. ^abcAlkon, Paul K. (1987).Origins of Futuristic Fiction.The University of Georgia Press.ISBN978-0-8203-0932-3.
  22. ^"An Anachronism; or, Missing One's Coach".Dublin University Magazine.11.June 1838.Archivedfrom the original on March 24, 2023.RetrievedMay 11,2022.
  23. ^abDerleth, August(1951).Far Boundaries.Pellegrini & Cudahy.
  24. ^"Lib.ru/Классика: Акутин Юрий. Александр Вельтман и его роман" Странник "".az.lib.ru.Archivedfrom the original on June 6, 2011.RetrievedDecember 29,2022.
  25. ^Flynn, John L. (1995)."Time Travel Literature".The Encyclopedia Galactica.Archived fromthe originalon September 29, 2006.RetrievedOctober 28,2006.
  26. ^Rudwick, Martin J. S. (1992).Scenes From Deep Time.The University of Chicago Press. pp. 166–169.ISBN978-0-226-73105-6.
  27. ^Hale, Edward Everett (1895).Hands Off.J. Stilman Smith & Co.
  28. ^abNahin, Paul J. (2001).Time machines: time travel in physics, metaphysics, and science fiction.Springer.ISBN978-0-387-98571-8.Archivedfrom the original on March 24, 2023.RetrievedOctober 20,2020.
  29. ^Page Mitchell, Edward."The Clock That Went Backward"(PDF).Archived fromthe original(PDF)on October 15, 2011.RetrievedDecember 4,2011.
  30. ^Uribe, Augusto (June 1999). "The First Time Machine: Enrique Gaspar's Anacronópete".The New York Review of Science Fiction.11, no. 10 (130): 12.
  31. ^Gaspar, Enrique (June 26, 2012).The Time Ship: A Chrononautical Journey.Wesleyan University Press.ISBN978-0-8195-7239-4.Archivedfrom the original on March 24, 2023.RetrievedDecember 29,2022.
  32. ^Westcott, Kathryn (April 9, 2011)."HG Wells or Enrique Gaspar: Whose time machine was first?".BBC News.Archived fromthe originalon March 29, 2014.RetrievedAugust 1,2014.
  33. ^Sterling, Bruce (August 27, 2014).science fiction | literature and performance:: Major science fiction themes.Britannica.Archivedfrom the original on October 5, 2015.RetrievedNovember 27,2015.
  34. ^abcdThorne, Kip S.(1994).Black Holes and Time Warps.W. W. Norton.ISBN978-0-393-31276-8.
  35. ^Bolonkin, Alexander (2011).Universe, Human Immortality and Future Human Evaluation.Elsevier. p. 32.ISBN978-0-12-415810-8.Archivedfrom the original on March 24, 2023.RetrievedMarch 26,2017.Extract of page 32Archived2023-03-24 at theWayback Machine
  36. ^abEverett, Allen (2004). "Time travel paradoxes, path integrals, and the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics".Physical Review D.69(124023): 124023.arXiv:gr-qc/0410035.Bibcode:2004PhRvD..69l4023E.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.124023.S2CID18597824.
  37. ^Miguel Alcubierre (June 29, 2012)."Warp Drives, Wormholes, and Black Holes"(PDF).Archived fromthe original(PDF)on March 18, 2016.RetrievedJanuary 25,2017.
  38. ^abcdJ. Richard Gott (August 25, 2015).Time Travel in Einstein's Universe: The Physical Possibilities of Travel Through Time.HMH. p. 33.ISBN978-0-547-52657-7.Archivedfrom the original on March 24, 2023.RetrievedFebruary 3,2018.
  39. ^Visser, Matt (2002).The quantum physics of chronology protection.arXiv:gr-qc/0204022.Bibcode:2003ftpc.book..161V.
  40. ^abHawking, Stephen(1992)."Chronology protection conjecture"(PDF).Physical Review D.46(2): 603–611.Bibcode:1992PhRvD..46..603H.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.46.603.PMID10014972.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on February 27, 2015.
  41. ^abc"Carl Sagan Ponders Time Travel".NOVA.PBS.December 10, 1999.Archivedfrom the original on July 15, 2019.RetrievedApril 26,2017.
  42. ^abHawking, Stephen;Thorne, Kip;Novikov, Igor;Ferris, Timothy;Lightman, Alan(2002).The Future of Spacetime.W. W. Norton.ISBN978-0-393-02022-9.
  43. ^S. W. Hawking,Introductory note to 1949 and 1952in Kurt Gödel,Collected works,Volume II (S. Feferman et al., eds).
  44. ^abVisser, Matt(1996).Lorentzian Wormholes.Springer-Verlag.ISBN978-1-56396-653-8.
  45. ^Cramer, John G.(1994)."NASA Goes FTL Part 1: Wormhole Physics".Analog Science Fiction & Fact Magazine.Archived fromthe originalon June 27, 2006.RetrievedDecember 2,2006.
  46. ^Visser, Matt;Sayan Kar; Naresh Dadhich (2003). "Traversable wormholes with arbitrarily small energy condition violations".Physical Review Letters.90(20): 201102.1–201102.4.arXiv:gr-qc/0301003.Bibcode:2003PhRvL..90t1102V.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.201102.PMID12785880.S2CID8813962.
  47. ^Visser, Matt(1993). "From wormhole to time machine: Comments on Hawking's Chronology Protection Conjecture".Physical Review D.47(2): 554–565.arXiv:hep-th/9202090.Bibcode:1993PhRvD..47..554V.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.554.PMID10015609.S2CID16830951.
  48. ^Visser, Matt(1997). "Traversable wormholes: the Roman ring".Physical Review D.55(8): 5212–5214.arXiv:gr-qc/9702043.Bibcode:1997PhRvD..55.5212V.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.5212.S2CID2869291.
  49. ^van Stockum, Willem Jacob(1936)."The Gravitational Field of a Distribution of Particles Rotating about an Axis of Symmetry".Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.Archived fromthe originalon August 19, 2008.
  50. ^Lanczos, Kornel(1924). "On a Stationary Cosmology in the Sense of Einstein's Theory of Gravitation".General Relativity and Gravitation.29(3). Springland Netherlands: 363–399.doi:10.1023/A:1010277120072.S2CID116891680.
  51. ^abEarman, John (1995).Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks: Singularities and Acausalities in Relativistic Spacetimes.Oxford University Press.Bibcode:1995bcws.book.....E.ISBN978-0-19-509591-3.
  52. ^Tipler, Frank J(1974). "Rotating Cylinders and the Possibility of Global Causality Violation".Physical Review D.9(8): 2203.Bibcode:1974PhRvD...9.2203T.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.2203.S2CID17524515.
  53. ^Erik Ofgang (August 13, 2015),"UConn Professor Seeks Funding for Time Machine Feasibility Study",Connecticut Magazine,archivedfrom the original on July 4, 2017,retrievedMay 8,2017
  54. ^Jarrell, Mark."The Special Theory of Relativity"(PDF).pp. 7–11. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on September 13, 2006.RetrievedOctober 27,2006.
  55. ^Kowalczyński, Jerzy (January 1984). "Critical comments on the discussion about tachyonic causal paradoxes and on the concept of superluminal reference frame".International Journal of Theoretical Physics.23(1).Springer Science+Business Media:27–60.Bibcode:1984IJTP...23...27K.doi:10.1007/BF02080670.S2CID121316135.
  56. ^Goldstein, Sheldon (March 27, 2017)."Bohmian Mechanics".Archivedfrom the original on January 12, 2012.RetrievedApril 26,2017.
  57. ^Nielsen, Michael; Chuang, Isaac (2000).Quantum Computation and Quantum Information.Cambridge. p.28.ISBN978-0-521-63235-5.
  58. ^Frank Arntzenius; Tim Maudlin (December 23, 2009),"Time Travel and Modern Physics",Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,archivedfrom the original on May 25, 2011,retrievedAugust 9,2005
  59. ^Vaidman, Lev (January 17, 2014)."Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics".Archivedfrom the original on December 9, 2019.RetrievedApril 26,2017.
  60. ^Deutsch, David(1991)."Quantum mechanics near closed timelike lines"(PDF).Physical Review D.44(10): 3197–3217.Bibcode:1991PhRvD..44.3197D.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3197.PMID10013776.S2CID38691795.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on February 28, 2019.
  61. ^Pieter Kok (February 3, 2013),Time Travel Explained: Quantum Mechanics to the Rescue?,archivedfrom the original on December 11, 2021
  62. ^abHawking, Stephen (1999)."Space and Time Warps".Archivedfrom the original on October 31, 2020.RetrievedSeptember 23,2020.
  63. ^Greene, Brian (2004).The Fabric of the Cosmos.Alfred A. Knopf. pp.197–199.ISBN978-0-375-41288-2.
  64. ^Wright, Laura (November 6, 2003)."Score Another Win for Albert Einstein".Discover.Archivedfrom the original on June 12, 2018.RetrievedOctober 21,2009.
  65. ^Anderson, Mark (August 18–24, 2007)."Light seems to defy its own speed limit".New Scientist.Vol. 195, no. 2617. p. 10.Archivedfrom the original on June 12, 2018.RetrievedSeptember 18,2018.
  66. ^HKUST Professors Prove Single Photons Do Not Exceed the Speed of Light,The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, July 17, 2011,archivedfrom the original on February 25, 2012,retrievedSeptember 5,2011
  67. ^Mark Baard (September 5, 2005),Time Travelers Welcome at MIT,Wired,archivedfrom the original on June 18, 2018,retrievedJune 18,2018
  68. ^Franklin, Ben A. (March 11, 1982)."The night the planets were aligned with Baltimore lunacy".The New York Times.Archived fromthe originalon December 6, 2008.
  69. ^"Welcome the People from the Future. March 9, 1982". Ad inArtforump. 90.
  70. ^Jaume Garriga; Alexander Vilenkin (2001). "Many worlds in one".Phys. Rev. D.64(4): 043511.arXiv:gr-qc/0102010.Bibcode:2001PhRvD..64d3511G.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.043511.S2CID119000743.
  71. ^Roberts, Tom (October 2007)."What is the experimental basis of Special Relativity?".Archivedfrom the original on May 1, 2013.RetrievedApril 26,2017.
  72. ^Nave, Carl Rod (2012)."Scout Rocket Experiment".HyperPhysics.Archivedfrom the original on April 26, 2017.RetrievedApril 26,2017.
  73. ^Nave, Carl Rod (2012)."Hafele-Keating Experiment".HyperPhysics.Archivedfrom the original on April 18, 2017.RetrievedApril 26,2017.
  74. ^Pogge, Richard W. (April 26, 2017)."GPS and Relativity".Archivedfrom the original on November 14, 2015.RetrievedApril 26,2017.
  75. ^Easwar, Nalini; Macintire, Douglas A. (1991)."Study of the effect of relativistic time dilation on cosmic ray muon flux – An undergraduate modern physics experiment".American Journal of Physics.59(7): 589–592.Bibcode:1991AmJPh..59..589E.doi:10.1119/1.16841.Archivedfrom the original on November 4, 2020.RetrievedSeptember 8,2020.
  76. ^Coan, Thomas; Liu, Tiankuan; Ye, Jingbo (2006). "A Compact Apparatus for Muon Lifetime Measurement and Time Dilation Demonstration in the Undergraduate Laboratory".American Journal of Physics.74(2): 161–164.arXiv:physics/0502103.Bibcode:2006AmJPh..74..161C.doi:10.1119/1.2135319.S2CID30481535.
  77. ^abFerraro, Rafael (2007),Einstein's Space-Time: An Introduction to Special and General Relativity,Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 52–53,Bibcode:2007esti.book.....F,ISBN9780387699462
  78. ^Serway, Raymond A. (2000)Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics,Fifth Edition, Brooks/Cole, p. 1258,ISBN0030226570.
  79. ^Mowbray, Scott (February 19, 2002)."Let's Do the Time Warp Again".Popular Science.Archivedfrom the original on June 28, 2010.RetrievedJuly 8,2011.Spending just over two years in Mir's Earth orbit, going 17,500 miles per hour, put Sergei Avdeyev 1/50th of a second into the future... 'he's the greatest time traveler we have so far.'
  80. ^Dagobert D. Runes, ed. (1942), "Time",The Dictionary of Philosophy,Philosophical Library, p. 318
  81. ^abThomas M. Crisp (2007),"Presentism, Eternalism, and Relativity Physics"(PDF),in William Lane Craig; Quentin Smith (eds.),Einstein, Relativity and Absolute Simultaneity,p. footnote 1,archived(PDF)from the original on February 2, 2018,retrievedFebruary 1,2018
  82. ^Dean Rickles (2007),Symmetry, Structure, and Spacetime,Elsevier, p. 158,ISBN9780444531162,archivedfrom the original on March 24, 2023,retrievedJuly 9,2016
  83. ^Tim Maudlin(2010),"On the Passing of Time"(PDF),The Metaphysics Within Physics,Oxford University Press,ISBN9780199575374,archived(PDF)from the original on March 8, 2021,retrievedFebruary 1,2018
  84. ^Keller, Simon; Michael Nelson (September 2001)."Presentists should believe in time-travel"(PDF).Australasian Journal of Philosophy.79(3): 333–345.doi:10.1080/713931204.S2CID170920718.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on October 28, 2008.
  85. ^Craig Bourne (December 7, 2006).A Future for Presentism.Clarendon Press.ISBN978-0-19-921280-4.
  86. ^Horwich, Paul (1987).Asymmetries in Time: Problems in the Philosophy of Science(2nd ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. p. 116.ISBN978-0262580885.
  87. ^Nicholas J.J. Smith (2013)."Time Travel".Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Archivedfrom the original on August 18, 2018.RetrievedNovember 2,2015.
  88. ^Francisco Lobo (2003). "Time, Closed Timelike Curves and Causality".The Nature of Time: Geometry.95:289–296.arXiv:gr-qc/0206078v2.Bibcode:2003ntgp.conf..289L.
  89. ^Norman Swartz (1993)."Time Travel: Visiting the Past".Archivedfrom the original on August 18, 2018.RetrievedFebruary 20,2016.
  90. ^Lewis, David (1976)."The paradoxes of time travel"(PDF).American Philosophical Quarterly.13:145–52.arXiv:gr-qc/9603042.Bibcode:1996gr.qc.....3042K.Archived(PDF)from the original on August 28, 2017.RetrievedSeptember 6,2010.
  91. ^Erdmann, Terry J.; Hutzel, Gary (2001).Star Trek: The Magic of Tribbles.Pocket Books. p. 31.ISBN978-0-7434-4623-5.
  92. ^abSmeenk, Chris; Wüthrich, Christian (2011), "Time Travel and Time Machines", in Callender, Craig (ed.),The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time,Oxford University Press, p. 581,ISBN978-0-19-929820-4
  93. ^Krasnikov, S. (2001), "The time travel paradox",Phys. Rev. D,65(6): 06401,arXiv:gr-qc/0109029,Bibcode:2002PhRvD..65f4013K,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.064013,S2CID18460829
  94. ^Klosterman, Chuck (2009).Eating the Dinosaur(1st Scribner hardcover ed.). New York: Scribner. pp.60–62.ISBN9781439168486.
  95. ^Friedman, John; Michael Morris; Igor Novikov; Fernando Echeverria; Gunnar Klinkhammer; Kip Thorne; Ulvi Yurtsever (1990)."Cauchy problem in spacetimes with closed timelike curves".Physical Review D.42(6): 1915–1930.Bibcode:1990PhRvD..42.1915F.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.42.1915.PMID10013039.Archivedfrom the original on September 28, 2011.RetrievedJanuary 10,2009.
  96. ^Ross, Kelley L. (2016),Time Travel Paradoxes,archivedfrom the original on January 18, 1998,retrievedApril 26,2017
  97. ^Greenberger, Daniel M.; Svozil, Karl (2005). "Quantum Theory Looks at Time Travel".Quo Vadis Quantum Mechanics?.The Frontiers Collection. p. 63.arXiv:quant-ph/0506027.Bibcode:2005 QvQ m.book...63G.doi:10.1007/3-540-26669-0_4.ISBN978-3-540-22188-3.S2CID119468684.
  98. ^Kettlewell, Julianna (June 17, 2005)."New model 'permits time travel'".BBC News.Archivedfrom the original on April 14, 2017.RetrievedApril 26,2017.

External links