Jump to content

Transmon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Inquantum computing,and more specifically insuperconducting quantum computing,atransmonis a type ofsuperconductingcharge qubitdesigned to have reduced sensitivity to charge noise. The transmon was developed byRobert J. Schoelkopf,Michel Devoret,Steven M. Girvin,and their colleagues atYale Universityin 2007.[1][2]Its name is an abbreviation of the termtransmission lineshuntedplasma oscillationqubit;one which consists of aCooper-pair box"where the two superconductors are also [capacitively] shunted in order to decrease the sensitivity to charge noise, while maintaining a sufficient anharmonicity for selective qubit control".[3]

A device consisting of four transmon qubits, fourquantum buses,and four readoutresonatorsfabricated byIBMand published innpj Quantum Informationin January 2017.[4]

The transmon achieves its reduced sensitivity to charge noise by significantly increasing the ratio of theJosephson energyto the charging energy. This is accomplished through the use of a large shunting capacitor. The result is energy level spacings that are approximately independent of offset charge. Planar on-chip transmon qubits haveT1coherence timesapproximately 30 μs to 40 μs.[5]Recent work has shown significantly improvedT1times as long as 95 μs by replacing the superconductingtransmission linecavity with a three-dimensional superconducting cavity,[6][7]and by replacingniobiumwithtantalumin the transmon device,T1is further improved up to 0.3 ms.[8]These results demonstrate that previousT1times were not limited byJosephson junctionlosses. Understanding the fundamental limits on the coherence time insuperconducting qubitssuch as the transmon is an active area of research.

Comparison to Cooper-pair box

[edit]
Eigenenergies(first three levels,) of the qubit Hamiltonian as a function of the effective offset chargefor different ratios.Energies are given in units of the transition energy,evaluated at the degeneracy point.The zero point of energy is chosen as the bottom of thelevel. The charge qubit (small,top) is normally operated at the"sweet spot", where fluctuations in cause less energy shift, and the anharmonicity is maximal. Transmon (large,bottom) energy levels are insensitive to fluctuations, but the anharmonicity is reduced.

The transmon design is similar to the first design of thecharge qubit[9]known as a "Cooper-pair box"; both are described by the same Hamiltonian, with the only difference being theratio. Hereis theJosephson energyof the junction, andis the charging energy inversely proportional to the total capacitance of the qubit circuit. Transmons typically have(whilefor typical Cooper-pair-box qubits), which is achieved by shunting theJosephson junctionwith an additional largecapacitor.

The benefit of increasing theratio is the insensitivity to charge noise—the energy levels become independent of the offset chargeacross the junction; thus thedephasingtime of the qubit is prolonged. The disadvantage is the reduced anharmonicity,whereis the energy difference between eigenstatesand.Reduced anharmonicity complicates the device operation as a two level system, e.g. exciting the device from the ground state to the first excited state by a resonant pulse also populates the higher excited state. This complication is overcome by complex microwave pulse design, that takes into account the higher energy levels, and prohibits their excitation by destructive interference. Also, while the variation ofwith respect totend to decrease exponentially with,the anharmonicity only has a weaker, algebraic dependence onas.The significant gain in the coherence time outweigh the decrease in the anharmonicity for controlling the states with high fidelity.

Measurement, control and coupling of transmons is performed by means of microwave resonators with techniques fromcircuit quantum electrodynamicsalso applicable toother superconducting qubits.Coupling to the resonators is done by placing a capacitor between the qubit and the resonator, at a point where the resonatorelectromagnetic fieldis greatest. For example, inIBM Quantum Experiencedevices, the resonators are implemented with "quarter wave"coplanar waveguideswith maximal field at the signal-ground short at the waveguide end; thus every IBM transmon qubit has a long resonator "tail". The initial proposal included similartransmission lineresonators coupled to every transmon, becoming a part of the name. However, charge qubits operated at a similarregime, coupled to different kinds of microwave cavities are referred to as transmons as well.

Transmons as qudits

[edit]

Transmons have been explored for use asd-dimensionalquditsvia the additional energy levels that naturally occur above the qubit subspace (the lowest two states). For example, the lowestthreelevels can be used to make a transmonqutrit;in the early 2020s, researchers have reported realizations of single-qutritquantum gateson transmons[10][11]as well as two-qutritentanglinggates.[12]Entangling gates on transmons have also been explored theoretically and in simulations for the general case of qudits of arbitraryd.[13]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Koch, Jens; Yu, Terri M.; Gambetta, Jay; Houck, A. A.; Schuster, D. I.; Majer, J.; Blais, Alexandre; Devoret, M. H.; Girvin, S. M.; Schoelkopf, R. J. (2007-10-12). "Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box".Physical Review A.76(4): 042319.arXiv:cond-mat/0703002.Bibcode:2007PhRvA..76d2319K.doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042319.ISSN1050-2947.S2CID53983107.
  2. ^Schreier, J. A.; Houck, A. A.; Koch, Jens; Schuster, D. I.; Johnson, B. R.; et al. (2008-05-12). "Suppressing charge noise decoherence in superconducting charge qubits".Physical Review B.77(18). American Physical Society (APS): 180402.arXiv:0712.3581.Bibcode:2008PhRvB..77r0502S.doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.180502.ISSN1098-0121.S2CID119181860.
  3. ^Fink, Johannes M. (2010).Quantum Nonlinearities in Strong Coupling Circuit QED(Ph.D.).ETH Zurich.
  4. ^Gambetta, Jay M.;Chow, Jerry M.;Steffen, Matthias (2017-01-13)."Building logical qubits in a superconducting quantum computing system".npj Quantum Information.3(1). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 2.arXiv:1510.04375.Bibcode:2017npjQI...3....2G.doi:10.1038/s41534-016-0004-0.ISSN2056-6387.S2CID118517248.
  5. ^Barends, R.; Kelly, J.; Megrant, A.; Sank, D.; Jeffrey, E.; et al. (2013-08-22). "Coherent Josephson Qubit Suitable for Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits".Physical Review Letters.111(8): 080502.arXiv:1304.2322.Bibcode:2013PhRvL.111h0502B.doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.080502.ISSN0031-9007.PMID24010421.S2CID27081288.
  6. ^Paik, Hanhee; Schuster, D. I.; Bishop, Lev S.; Kirchmair, G.; Catelani, G.; et al. (2011-12-05). "Observation of High Coherence in Josephson Junction Qubits Measured in a Three-Dimensional Circuit QED Architecture".Physical Review Letters.107(24): 240501.arXiv:1105.4652.Bibcode:2011PhRvL.107x0501P.doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.240501.ISSN0031-9007.PMID22242979.S2CID19296685.
  7. ^Rigetti, Chad; Gambetta, Jay M.; Poletto, Stefano; Plourde, B. L. T.; Chow, Jerry M.; et al. (2012-09-24). "Superconducting qubit in a waveguide cavity with a coherence time approaching 0.1 ms".Physical Review B.86(10). American Physical Society (APS): 100506.arXiv:1202.5533.Bibcode:2012PhRvB..86j0506R.doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.100506.ISSN1098-0121.S2CID118702797.
  8. ^Place, Alexander P. M.; Rodgers, Lila V. H.; Mundada, Pranav; Smitham, Basil M.; Fitzpatrick, Mattias; Leng, Zhaoqi; Premkumar, Anjali; Bryon, Jacob; Vrajitoarea, Andrei; Sussman, Sara; Cheng, Guangming; Madhavan, Trisha; Cava, Robert J.;de Leon, Nathalie;Houck, Andrew A. (2021-03-19)."New material platform for superconducting transmon qubits with coherence times exceeding 0.3 milliseconds".Nature Communications.12(1): 1779.arXiv:2003.00024.Bibcode:2021NatCo..12.1779P.doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22030-5.ISSN2041-1723.PMC7979772.PMID33741989.
  9. ^Bouchiat, V.; Vion, D.; Joyez, P.; Esteve, D.; Devoret, M. H. (1998). "Quantum coherence with a single Cooper pair".Physica Scripta.1998(T76): 165.Bibcode:1998PhST...76..165B.doi:10.1238/Physica.Topical.076a00165.ISSN1402-4896.S2CID250887469.
  10. ^Yurtalan, M. A.; Shi, J.; Kononenko, M.; Lupascu, A.; Ashhab, S. (2020-10-27)."Implementation of a Walsh-Hadamard Gate in a Superconducting Qutrit".Physical Review Letters.125(18): 180504.arXiv:2003.04879.Bibcode:2020PhRvL.125r0504Y.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.180504.PMID33196217.S2CID128064435.
  11. ^Morvan, A.; Ramasesh, V. V.; Blok, M. S.; Kreikebaum, J. M.; O’Brien, K.; Chen, L.; Mitchell, B. K.; Naik, R. K.; Santiago, D. I.; Siddiqi, I. (2021-05-27)."Qutrit Randomized Benchmarking".Physical Review Letters.126(21): 210504.arXiv:2008.09134.Bibcode:2021PhRvL.126u0504M.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.210504.hdl:1721.1/143809.PMID34114846.S2CID221246177.
  12. ^Goss, Noah; Morvan, Alexis; Marinelli, Brian; Mitchell, Bradley K.; Nguyen, Long B.; Naik, Ravi K.; Chen, Larry; Jünger, Christian; Kreikebaum, John Mark; Santiago, David I.; Wallman, Joel J.; Siddiqi, Irfan (2022-12-05)."High-fidelity qutrit entangling gates for superconducting circuits".Nature Communications.13(1): 7481.arXiv:2206.07216.Bibcode:2022NatCo..13.7481G.doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34851-z.ISSN2041-1723.PMC9722686.PMID36470858.
  13. ^Fischer, Laurin E.; Chiesa, Alessandro; Tacchino, Francesco; Egger, Daniel J.; Carretta, Stefano; Tavernelli, Ivano (2023-08-28)."Universal Qudit Gate Synthesis for Transmons".PRX Quantum.4(3): 030327.arXiv:2212.04496.Bibcode:2023PRXQ....4c0327F.doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.030327.S2CID254408561.