Jump to content

User:Dsimic

This user has autoconfirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has extended confirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user uses HotCat to work with categories.
This user watches over Wikipedia with the help of Navigation popups!
Trout this user
This user has a page on the Wikimedia Commons.
This user is the primary contributor that helped "Row hammer" become a good article on September 28, 2015.
This user helped get "Row hammer" listed at Did You Know on the main page on October 12, 2015.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sunday
15
September
18:22 UTC

About me

[edit]
ThisLinux laundry detergentisnotwhat I'm referring to.:)

Hello there! My name inreal lifeis Dragan Simic, just in case you've wondered where my Wikipediausernamecomes from.:) In more detail, I wanted an all-lowercase username, but having one unfortunately wasn't (and still isn't) possible due to certain technical restrictions of Wikipedia that impose differentnaming constraints.I also have an account onWikimedia Commonswith the same username, whichbelongsto myunified loginhavingEnglish Wikipediaas the home wiki.

I'm pretty much a person who ordinary people would call acomputer geek,and I'm proud of that. Myobsessionwith computers started with aCommodore 64in my early childhood, and turned later into a professional devotion to various areas ofcomputingandcomputer science,including differentUnixvariants(with the primary focus onLinux),low-levelandhigh-levelprogramming,compilers,algorithmsanddata structures,networking hardwareandprotocols,load balancing(had anold paperpublished),computer security,databases,computer hardwarein general,microcontrollers,andembedded devices.In addition, a fewuserboxeslistedbelowprovide more of my background information.:)

My Wikipedia work

[edit]

I'vejoinedEnglish Wikipedia back in February 2008, remaining pretty much inactive until September 2013 when I started to do somereal work(a differentbreakdownis also available,[a]and here'sanother onethat pretty much combines the former two).My work[b]on the English Wikipedia mainly consists ofcontributingnew content and doing variousimprovementsto already existingcomputing-relatedarticles, together withcreatingor starting (so far, a few dozens of)new articlesfrom the same field; traffic statistics and related useful links for those new articles are availablein a section below.Furthermore, so far I've created hundreds ofnew redirectsfor variouspurposes,anduploadeda bunch ofimagesto Wikimedia Commons and a few of themlocally– as we know, a picture is worthat least a few kilobytes.:)

As a contribution different fromdeveloping articles,I've also written acomputer programthat helps in assessing how muchtraffica group of articles receives; more details about it are availablein a section below.Heck, I've additionallydiscovered and reporteda somewhat significant bug inMediaWiki(tracked asT64268), which was fixed very quickly.

Thoughts on Wikipedia

[edit]
This chart shows the English Wikipedia's article countgrowth ratesince 2001.[c]

In myhumble opinion,Wikipedia is areallygreat thing becausepretty much anyonecanimproveboth themselves and the whole world bycontributingto it and workingtogetherwith theother editors.Where else‍—short of contributingsource codeto a high-profileopen-sourcesoftware project, of course‍—can you have your workreviewedand improved by hundreds ofgoodpeoplefor free,while contributing to a very popular encyclopedia that's (hopefully) going to remainpublicly accessibleindefinitely? Moreover, why would you take your private paper (or text file)notes,when you can instead do thaton Wikipediafor everyone's long-term benefit?:)

Beside opening paths to various improvements in one'sreal-world knowledge,Wikipedia is agreatdestination fornon-nativeEnglish speakers looking to improve theirwritten English– over time,hundreds of eyeballswill look over one's contributions and point out variousgrammarandwriting styleweaknesses. Of course, learning English that way takesa lot of time,but you can hardly get similar quality of teaching throughcopy editingfor free anywhere else. At the same time, please don't miss to have a look at the Wikipedia'sManual of Style,which is pretty much an invaluable free resource.

Lesser-known stuff

[edit]

Did you know that the entire content of Wikipedia iseasily downloadable,including completerevision histories?Or maybe you'd just like to see theSQL schemaof the Wikipedia'sdatabasebackend? Not a problem, that's alsoeasily accessible.At the same time, variousdatabase reportsare available, broken down by numerous categories; for example, you can see which pages havethe most revisions,thenumber of pagesin eachnamespace,most-watched pagesby namespace, or theWikiLoveusage statistics.

My userboxes

[edit]

Below is a selection ofuserboxesthat provide more of my background information, including mycomputer programmingandlanguageskills. There are also a couple ofquotationsrelated tosoftware development,which I find amusing and pretty much right to the point – I'm sure those will bring a smile to your face if you've spent any substantial amount of timein that industry.:)

Articles I've created

[edit]
Monthly breakdown of total daily page views
800
1,100
1,500
1,800
2,000
3,060
2,700
3,100
3,450
3,800
3,700
4,120
3,450
4,160
3,920
4,330
4,420
4,210
4,020
4,050
5,450
4,900
5,000
4,900
5,070
5,930
5,890
5,920
5,340
5,370
5,350
Dec
'13
Jan
'14
Feb
'14
Mar
'14
Apr
'14
May
'14
Jun
'14
Jul
'14
Aug
'14
Sep
'14
Oct
'14
Nov
'14
Dec
'14
Jan
'15
Feb
'15
Mar
'15
Apr
'15
May
'15
Jun
'15
Jul
'15
Aug
'15
Sep
'15
Oct
'15
Nov
'15
Dec
'15
Jan
'16
Feb
'16
Mar
'16
Apr
'16
May
'16
Jun
'16

The box below lists the articlesI've createdor started, in the reverse chronological order of their creation so the newest article is on top of the list; the article titles are linked to their 90-daytraffic statisticscharts.

As of July 1, 2016,there are about 5,350 total dailypage viewsfor all these articles, based on their traffic statistics forone month into past;see alsomy PHP programthat calculates the monthly statistics. This summary statistics value doesn't includespider- orbot-generated traffic, and doesn't include accesses to articles via variousredirect pages,which also applies to the traffic statistics charts linked below and the monthly breakdown provided above. The described redirect-related behavior can be verified by comparing the statistics of an article thathas been renamed:here are thearticle statistics,redirect statistics,andstatistics search.[d]

Traffic statistics and other useful links for the articles I've created or started

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^As of May 2016,this breakdown is a bit flaky and often returns an "access denied"message for no obvious reason (perhaps it does some kind ofbandwidth throttling?), so just keep refreshing the web page until it works. It also takes a couple of minutes for this report to generate and display the statistics, so please be patient. As a faster-working and more reliable alternative, you may want to try thenew testing versionof this breakdown, which also doesn't requireAdobe Flash.
  2. ^As of May 2015,this global user contributions utility is marked asbeta,and I can only confirm that it sometimes displays incorrect edit lists and relatedSULaccount attachments.
  3. ^In 2013, totalcompressedsize of theEnglish Wikipedia's article textwas about nine gigabytes.
  4. ^As of March 2015,thetools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstatsutility has been offline for months, resulting in error pages displayed for some of theexternal linksin this section. It is (or was?) such agreatutility that I'm still reluctant to delete links to it, hoping there's someone working on bringing it back online soon.
Committed identity:8663a7d7e95985238d0b91d538cf4420e78208a0a6b37828a174b81086920be81c23df6b84741265aff3a33b146210bc4fea9de9ac65ae6f12eb94fe26adaa2d is aSHA-512commitmentto this user's real-life identity.