User talk:KJP1

Whack! You've beenwhacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

Worldbruce(talk)15:01, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Future use

• Category:Heritage citation templates
• Wikipedia:RIGHTGREATWRONGS
• Template:National Historic Assets of Wales
• Welsh Historic Churches Project
• Categories
• [1]
• TGB

Notes to self

• Matthew Brettingham- FARKJP1(talk)17:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
• Midland Bank, Poultry- needs expansion.
• 6th Baron Tredegar- needs an article, but draft exists- now article,John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar
• Cliff Tucker (executive)- needs an article,probably best left inA. E. Dyson
• Raymond Howell- needs an article
• Marquess of Bute- 8th needs an article,[2]
• Pevsner Architectural Guides- re-instate full tables
• Monmouthshire- finish updating
• Salisbury Cathedral- needs more work.

The Barnstar of Diligence

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your continued unstinting and heroiclabours,very largelyunsupported,at the CCI.Martinevans123(talk)14:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Appreciated, Martin. But I wouldn't say it's unsupported. Others, including Dianna, The 4lines, Moneytrees, Tony and yourself, have put a lot of of effort in. I think it's just that, being jubilado (! - I'm learning), I have rather more time. And tomorrow, Mr Pickford should be arriving with all my books, so, if needed, we can help Murgatroyd with A la Ronde. That, and the remaining two sections will knock off Part 1, and with 4/5/6 already done, the end will be in sight! If still rather a ways off.......!KJP1(talk)14:25, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Doesn't he"make exceedingly good cakes"?Ah no wait, that's theother guy,isn't it...Martinevans123(talk)14:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

KJP1, I had just been thinking that I should ask you how the move was going. Sounds like it's coming along well? --Tryptofish(talk)19:09, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Tryptofish- Great to hear from you. It is actually going pretty well. There are many challenges in relocating to an area where you don’t speak the language with any fluency - but there are many compensations. The city is truly beautiful, the weather is fabulous, and the tapas and wine are close to unbeatable. Now, we just need to sort the pets, the house, the wifi, the doctor, the dentist, the padron…. I really hope your own personal issues are resolving themselves.KJP1(talk)19:58, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Olé!the claim that this is "taken from" Top of the Pops "(BBC) 1974" seems a little wide of the mark, but hey, it's hardlyColtraneis it!Martinevans123(talk)21:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Beautiful weather, tapas and wine – that all sounds wonderful, and well worth the remaining hassles. Thanks for asking about me: it's a slower recovery than I had hoped, but overall good, nothing serious. --Tryptofish(talk)22:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Phew!! Four down, two to go.Martinevans123(talk)13:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Yep - we're making progress. I think I'll try Section 3 next. It doesn't seem to have those multi-edits of which you're so fond. Normally covering current events (how isMrs Vennellsby the way?), obscure jazz artists, mass murderers or Strictly contestants!KJP1(talk)13:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

We'renot on speaking terms,I'm afraid. Shucks, looks like you've got my top interests well and trulynailedthere.Martinevans123(talk)14:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

I missed out a, to me somewhat unexpected, interest in the technical aspects of planes, particularly cockpits, air/road accidents, ergonomics, and matters loosely grouped as health and safety. As well as European artists as obscure as your jazz musicians. What a polymath you are.KJP1(talk)14:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Polymath?? lol... More of ahalf-deadparrot,I'm afraid. Less"pieces of eight",and moreBritish blues history...Martinevans123(talk)14:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

That would be theNew Polymath.--Tryptofish(talk)21:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Or more likely justPoly Styrene:[3]Martinevans123(talk)21:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Tired? Fed up of tedious assumed copyvio from long-dead sources?Tense, nervous headache?TakeSt Basil's!!... just sayin' lol.Martinevans123(talk)22:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Burying your horse in the garden?? That's worse than adog cemetery!Martinevans123(talk)13:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

You can read my mind!KJP1(talk)13:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

...and after 3000+ copyvio checks, you can alsoread mine,alas...Martinevans123(talk)13:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Rheidol Stag

Thanks for the change, it looks better, especially as the image is relevant to both sections.Murgatroyd49(talk)13:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Murgatroyd49- Thanks. It's not perfect, but I think it's better than it was. At least it doesn't smash into the Refs. In an ideal world, I'd have found a cite that supported the whole para. and kept it, but it's a far from ideal world! All the best.KJP1(talk)13:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

How's things?

Hello hello! Believe me, I'm tired of Montacute House – I don't think anyone arrives at a talk page to discuss fairly minor (to my mind) changes and still be there weeks later, but that's the nature of the Wiki sometimes.

On a lighter note, how are things with you? Are there any Burges-related articles left to bring up to standard, or have you finished for the moment? Personally I'm taking a bit of a break after doing Dolwyddelan and Criccieth castles, but I'm sure I'll find a project soon – I did think about bringing Penarth Fawr up to GA, it's not all that far off in its current state. What do you reckon, given you're one of the main editors?A.D.Hope(talk)21:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Frankly, I'm currently a little wearied by theMoSLutherans."Hier stehe ich, ich kann nicht anders" is a great line, but less helpful as a basis for collaboration.KJP1(talk)08:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

In that case I'll leave you in peace.A.D.Hope(talk)10:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

February music

story·music·places

Thank you for the spring clean-up for the much-missed RexxS. - As for the question about archiving (in the edit summary), I believe that the expressions of appreciation and missing are as valid as they were when written, so for whom would would we put them into a drawer? - My latest stories concernHelga ParisandSeiji Ozawa- on the Main page for a sad reason - with personal memories of concerts with Ozawa (on my talk). --Gerda Arendt(talk)09:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I can see the point of view that says leave them as a tribute. Although, I think that's more common for deceased editors, and Rexxs is, very fortunately, not among that choir. Just an editor who decided there were other uses for their time. I'll see what other views may emerge. Very happy to leave as is, subject to occasional weeding, if that's the consensus view.KJP1(talk)09:56, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

p.s. I do like snowdrops.KJP1(talk)09:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. I make the image larger to show they are croci;) - the image, taken on a cemetery last year after the funeral of a distant but dear family member, commemorates today, with thanks for their achievements, four subjects mentioned on the Main page andVami_IV,a friend here, - that other choir. Listen tomusic by Tchaikovsky(an article whereone of the fouris pictured),sung by today's subject(whose performance on stage I enjoyed two days ago). --Gerda Arendt(talk)16:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

more music and flowers onRossini's rare birthday--Gerda Arendt(talk)15:34, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar
		Thank you for your help at CCI! Your help is greatly appreciated. Keep up the good work:)MrLinkinPark333(talk)15:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at theWikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboardregarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

A.D.Hope(talk)16:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

“In that case I’ll leave you in peace.” Well, that didn’t last long.KJP1(talk)17:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

I have an obligation to notify you of the discussion, as you're an involved editor, but (as the notice states) you do not have to participate and can ignore it if you wish.A.D.Hope(talk)02:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations|March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You cansign up hereorask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t·c)buidhe02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

The Winnowing Fan Barnstar for you!

		The Winnowing Fan Barnstar
		Awarded to those who work to separate Wikipedia's "pure wheat"from its"copy chaff"! Only another 17 years before the next one.... thecheque's in the Andalusian post... Martinevans123(talk)17:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Martin - thank you. What an unusual barnstar, I don't think I've seen one before. I am very glad, as I know you are, that the business is done. All the very best.KJP1(talk)18:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Here's atoken gestureof myimmense thanks."A winnow-way, a winnow-way, the Copyvio lion sleeps tonight",& etc.Martinevans123(talk)18:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Wow, holy shit. Thanks a ton for your work on that KJP1.Moneytrees🏝️(Talk)19:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

That's good news indeed! A day that felt like it might never have come. Whew! --Tryptofish(talk)21:40, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

(You too could have enjoyed multipleB&Qdiscount vouchers... and a years supply ofwokerati tofu.Never mind.Martinevans123(talk)21:45, 1 March 2024 (UTC))

I'll settle for some leeks. --Tryptofish(talk)22:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

How about some very tastyPleurobranchaea britannica?Altogether now..."Britons never, never, never shall be slugs!!"etc.Martinevans123(talk)22:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Isthatwhere Boris Johnson ended up? --Tryptofish(talk)22:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Still has full dining rights at theBullingdon Club!He'snot a spider!! --Martinevans123(talk)23:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

March thanks

story·music·places

Thank you for having done most of Martin's CCI - that's what he says! - OnSmetana's 200th birthday--Gerda Arendt(talk)12:06, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Yes, he's "cyntaf ymhlith cyfartalion",as they say in Ystalyfera.(sorry if the mutation is a bit wonky there)Martinevans123(talk)09:58, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Do you have ideas regarding the works by Rossini and Vivaldi, perhaps? --Gerda Arendt(talk)14:37, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

I'm afraid I'm tone deaf, have a singing voice like a foghorn, and can barely tell one end of a tuba from another. I'm not the person to ask musical questions of.KJP1(talk)14:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Danny Kayecould probably help you.... but perhaps Gerda was asking me?!Martinevans123(talk)15:11, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Why didn’t she ask on your Talkpage then? What am I, your postman!!!!KJP1(talk)15:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

why? 'cause I go by links to the flowers in Alpha betical order when I update, and first comes K --Gerda Arendt(talk)15:41, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Certainly not!! More of abutler of the in-between pantry,I've always thought...Martinevans123(talk)15:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

I am sorry, - I meant you both, and I didn't mean their music alone, but how these works are represented in their Wikipedia articles. See Vivaldi talk. If I say one more word I'll be accused of canvassing. --Gerda Arendt(talk)15:38, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

I might try and answer for both of us... I always enjoy a spot ofcamping.Especially if it involves agood pizza!Martinevans123(talk)15:48, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

... andthe premiere of Nabucco- I always wanted to go to that theatre where Idomeneo premiered, and they played Mozart! --Gerda Arendt(talk)21:16, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Rossini'sPetite messe solennellewaspremiered on 14 March 1864,- when Ilisten to the desolate Agnus DeiI think ofVami_IV.--Gerda Arendt(talk)22:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Vacation pics uploaded, at least the first day, - andAribert Reimann remembered.--Gerda Arendt(talk)19:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Please Support my Wikipedia Library Request (if you so choose)

Hi,

Sorry for using your talk page, but I couldn't think of a better way to access you. You have shown an interest in British (Country House) Architectural History. I have suggested that Wikipedians gain access to the Country Life Archive on The Wikipedia Library (https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/suggest/). Please feel free to support this suggestion (titled "Country Life Archive (Proquest)" on the above page) if you think this is a good idea.

Feel free to @ me here with any questions.

Cheers,EPEAviator(talk)02:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Monmouthshire

Apologies for being a few days late, but I've only just noticed your efforts at theMonmouthshirearticle. Well done for attempting it! I will try to pick up any minor changes as you go. I have various offline sources (aka books), including one published by the County Council in 1974,Monmouthshire County Council 1888-1974,which may well have material that can be used (it's a very long time since I looked at it!). Let me know if there are specific questions where I may be able to help.Ghmyrtle(talk)09:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Ghmyrtle- No apology necessary, and great to hear from you. I stumbled into it only because I want to do a small article on theGwent County History,and then realised there was quite a lot of work needed. It's going to be a long job - partly because it's a big topic; partly because all my books, including the Gwent County History, are still in store following a move. There's a least one issue - and likely more - that's going to need a bit of wider discussion: what to cover in Monmouthshire, and what to cover inMonmouthshire (historic),including the Wales/England status issue? And the tricky issue of the western 2/5ths of the county which were in Monmouthshire (historic) but aren't in the present county, although they were inGwent (county)(1972-1996). This is important for things likemining in Monmouthshire,a big deal in the 18th-20th centuries, much less so for modern Monmouthshire. Anyways, all that can be kicked around on the talkpage. I'd really appreciate any help you can give. I'm not editing that intensively, so feel free to add/amend/take-away anything you want at any stage. All the best.KJP1(talk)10:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the [[4]] regarding reason. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "[Yale|Elihu Yale] ".The discussion is about the topicElihu Yale.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

--Academia45(talk)23:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi KJP1, thanks for your comment at my talk, I don't mind if you jumped in. It was a question out of the blue, although did understand their concerns so merely hidden it and kept it private. Nonetheless a bit weird where they came from and how my userpage was worth the comment, I do wonder what their links are and if they're closer to the subject then they say, as they reference long-standing discussions concerning "agenda[s]". But that's speculation. Nonetheless thanks!DankJae18:36, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

DankJae- If that user is new to Wikipedia/Wicipedia, I’m a Dutchman! All the best.KJP1(talk)18:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Victorian Turkish bath

Hi, I'm not going to go to the stake over this. My next edit on this point will be my last so you have final say. However, Turkish baths is a phrase used both in the singular and plural (check the 'literature'). Whether 'Turkish baths' or 'a Turkish bath' is used the phrase is either a place (housing several rooms with different purposes) or a process (involving several actions). The same applies to a Hammam. So my final compromise edit, since you prefer not to use the plural form, is to remove the word 'suite' which is tautological since '(a) Turkish Bath' or 'Turkish baths' are both by definition, a suite of rooms, or areas—in Cragside's case, five.— Precedingunsignedcomment added byIshpoloni(talk•contribs)23:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Ishpoloni- I agree the issue is minor. I've removed the image, only because it's not a very good one (hands/oblique view/sketch), but if you have one of the bath itself we could certainly put it in. Aside from that, I've left the wording as per your latest edit. My remaining concern is that it seems unnecessary to me to describe it as aVictorianbath, the whole house is Victorian being built entirely in the reign of QV, but I understand that you are wanting to emphasise thetype,more than thedate.Just by way of a learning point for us both; perWikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle,we would have been better to have had this discussion on the article's TalkpageR after the first reversion. Regards.KJP1(talk)06:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your understanding. The use of Victorian does appear a bit pedantic, I know. However, it's not being used—here or elsewhere on wiki—to qualify the bath, but to qualify the word Turkish. Two points, in a nutshell: 1. The Victorian Turkish is a specific type of hot-air bath utilising only dry air, rather than a bath specific to Turkey; 'Turkish bath' is a catch-all phrase which is now used for almost anything from a steam bath to a gay sauna; 2. Actually more important, the Islamic world generally resents things such as the Turkish bath being considered specifically Turkish rather than an intrinsic part of Islamic culture. This is all set out rather more clearly in the posts by R Prazeres and myself in the section 'Name and meaning' on theHammam talk pagein September 2020, preceding the split two years later of the "Turkish baths" article into "Hammam" and "Victorian Turkish baths".

I'm not at all unhappy that you removed the image! I wasn't sure whether I could send it to you on the talk page first. It is bad a bad image, and I wasn't familiar with my wife's camera. I do have better ones of the "wardrobe", the drench shower, the tiled plunge, and a corner of the hot room. Is there any way I can show them to you—without putting them all on Commons—so you could choose one, if you wish?Ishpoloni(talk)11:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Ishpoloni- Not an issue at all. I was too grumpy, and probably 70 per cent to blame - if not more! One tries to avoid being too protective of articles one has taken to FA but it can be hard. I love hearing from other editors with an interest, and should have been more welcoming. I think the addition of an image of the bath would be very useful, but I don't believe I could see them without their going on Commons, unless you already have them on the web somewhere. Then you could dothis.While we're chatting, you don't happen to know the "other bath" Mr Shifrin refers to, seeTalk:Cragside?That may make a good footnote, following the text about it being unusual for a private house. All the very best.KJP1(talk)11:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Further to your note re Malcolm Shifrin's use of 'suite'. Yes, embarrassing. I was hoping you wouldn't notice! However, that was written eleven years ago and I think I can safely say he has moved on from there—see section "Total disclosure" onTalk:Victorian Turkish baths.Ishpoloni(talk)11:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Ishpoloni- I suspected that might be the case, but didn't want to engage in outing! TheVictorian Turkish bathsarticle is excellent - I've added a Talkpage header and given it a C quality rating. I could as easily have chosen B. Please add/remove any projects you think are aligned/inappropriate. The book looks similarly fascinating, and a copy will soon be added to my library. You might think about taking the article further - it has Good Article written all over it. If I can assist in any way, just let me know. And the Bishopsgate one,[5],which I often used to walk by, is crying out for its own article. All the very best.KJP1(talk)12:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Had second thoughts on the images as I will probably use some when I come to the subsection in the article "VTb in private houses". So I've uploaded 4 images (+ 1 accidentally cropped version, by mistake, which I don't know how to delete and suspect I won't be allowed to). They are now on Commons at "Cragside Turkish baths". Do feel free to add one to the Cragside article if you wish. I will not be upset in any way if you decide against doing so. Best wishes.Ishpoloni(talk)15:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Added - and it looks good. Do we have a snappy quote? I like captions.KJP1(talk)18:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Buckinghamshire

Hi! Do you have your Pevsners to hand these days? I've been working my through the surviving Stephenson-designed structures from the London and Birmingham Railway. There are surprisingly many, though sadly the original Euston is long gone. I've found a potential FA inWolverton Viaduct.I was hoping Nik or his successors might have an opinion on it. Best,HJ Mitchell|Penny for your thoughts?12:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

HJ Mitchell- I am amazed you have the time! Unfortunately, they are all still in boxes, as we await thebuilders.These things can take some time in this neck of the woods. I shall add it to my list; I'm quite sure Sir Nik will have something to add. Not directly related to your quest, but have you seen this,River Irwell Railway Bridge,by his old man? As you can see from my pic, it's exceptionally hard to get a decent view of it. All the best.KJP1(talk)12:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Yes I have, and yes it's damn difficult to get close to! It's Grade I so you'd think it would be an easy FA but there's not much depth to any of the coverage; I have a pile of books and they all have the same three or four sentences! Might have to pad it out a bit with some background on the Liverpool & Manchester. Some of the other engineering works on that line definitely have FA potential.HJ Mitchell|Penny for your thoughts?13:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Semana santa

I have long observed theTriduumas aLatin RiteChristian, and that is the first time I have seen the Latin name for the week.Robert McClenon(talk)18:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Robert McClenon- Catholics know how to celebrate!KJP1(talk)07:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination ofToad Hall (The Wind in the Willows)for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleToad Hall (The Wind in the Willows)is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelinesor whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toad Hall (The Wind in the Willows)until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999(talk)16:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedMonmouthshire,you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageDistrict Council.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot(talk)18:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Ey up

Hello! Now that the some normality has returned after the whole Montacute thing I just thought I'd pop by and see how you were doing. Are you working on anything interesting at the moment?

I was also wondering, after your comment over at the Pevsners article, just how big your collection is – my own is quite modest and entirely composed of the more recent editions, so I'm a little envious of anyone who's managed to amass a more complete set! They do come in handy – I'm in the middle of givingGibsidea bit of an overhaul and the National Trust guidebook is one of those fairly slim modern ones, so having a copy ofCounty Durhamto hand has proved invaluable.

Anyway, I hope you're enjoying your weekend.A.D.Hope(talk)12:38, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

A.D.Hope- Thanks for dropping by. I’m well thanks, and hope you are too. Not really got anything major on the go at present. Have been doing some bits onMonmouthshire,which still needs work. My problem, and it’s not really a problem, is that all my books are packed up following a move, and it will be a while before I have them back on shelves and readily available. Which includes my set of Pevsner. I was lucky enough to start pulling them together many moons ago, and have both the originals and the reviseds, with the exception of the recently publishedIsle of Man.The revised were about half the current price then, and the originals could be got for very little. Now, at £60 a pop, it would be an expensive business to pull a full set together. But they are absolutely superb - how I wroteAndrew Pettigrewwithout access to the, late lamented,John Newman,I shall never know.Gibsideis a very interesting garden, and I look forward to reading the results. All the very best.KJP1(talk)21:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Tryptofish suggested you might be of help with an article I'm writing.

SeeUser talk:Doug Weller#My draft User:Doug Weller/Pinxton Castle.I've a lot of sources but there are contradictions between them.Doug Wellertalk13:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Doug Weller- I’d be delighted to take a look, and will do so shortly.KJP1(talk)21:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

I'll link my sources to the talk page shortly. My main problem is disagreement among sources. Give it a day or so and I "ll put something on the talk page about that. Thanks very much,Doug Wellertalk06:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

@Doug Weller- Fine, then I'll take a look. I tend to think with disagreement among sources, the best approach is to just reflect that disagreement.Piercefield Houseis a good example.Cadwand the book sources disagree on the build date, and even who the architect was!KJP1(talk)09:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

I agree entirely. Sources that I have, except the article by William Stevens which I have in hard copy, are now on the talk page with raw urls to easily identify them. Thanks again.Doug Wellertalk12:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Doug Weller- Just in case you've missed it, I've put some suggestions on the Pinxton Castle Draft Talkpage. As has Richard Nevell, who knows more about castles than I ever will. Let me know if I can be of further help.KJP1(talk)15:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

That's fantastic. RL has been a pain for a while, plus Admin etc stuff, so I haven't gotten around to it. Then lost all my Firefox tabs, somehow Chrome got attached to my Arbcom address, etc. Now getting ready for my wife's WI evening tomorrow with people coming here and dealing with work being done on kitchen cabinets! Have to go depoo the garden now, organise my sous vide tenderloin to make Banh Mi, I forget what else. Oh, didn't finish my Treadmill 2k.Doug Wellertalk15:58, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Just checking...

I know you're interested in old churches. So I just wanted to check you were ok and hadn't been trying to get areally good photo for Wikipedia?? "I say,ding dong,old chap! "Martinevans123(talk)15:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

30! I wish. That boat sailed rather a long time ago. I’m well thanks. I am wanting to do an article on thechurch in our little square,but have yet to gather enough sources.KJP1(talk)21:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Well just don't be tempted to do anyclimbing!(Listen... a bit ofPolish botox,a few dabs ofmascara,and aTurkish teeth job... and no-one will ever know!)Martinevans123(talk)21:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Sam Rolfe

Hello - I was flat out wrong - I apologize! Thank you for making the article more informative and most importantly, accurate. Thanks again!

Hello!

I find myself in a Chandos-similar situation atTalk:The_Merchant_of_Venice#Plot_summary,mainly about a WP:OR section about wrongs in the play, but there's the two plot-sections as well. Take a look if you like. If you don't feel like involving yourself, that shows you're a reasonable person.Gråbergs Gråa Sång(talk)10:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

A beer for you!

For trying.Gråbergs Gråa Sång(talk)09:33, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Cesare Villari e Silvia che creano Michael Jackson and Bubbles.jpg

Michael Jackson and Bubbles - not in screamingTechnicolorunfortunately

Thanks, I shall enjoy that. As to whether the attempt will be fruitful.... my expectations are not high.KJP1(talk)09:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

No, but it's never wrong to try. I seem to be getting into these "battles" lately, have another one going on at[6].Oh well."Knowledge production, at least in the Wikipedia sense, is part collaboration and part combat."-Stephen HarrisonGråbergs Gråa Sång(talk)09:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Did you want a packet ofpork scratchingswith that, mate?Martinevans123(talk)10:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Ah, art. Where would we be without it.Gråbergs Gråa Sång(talk)10:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

That's got to be one of the worst artworks I've seen since the lastJeff Koonsshowing!KJP1(talk)10:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Being a Lovecraft fan, I liked this one:[7]Gråbergs Gråa Sång(talk)10:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

And this one is great on so many levels...Gråbergs Gråa Sång(talk)10:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

'Ere mate, are you justtakin' the pissor what??[8]Tim Patch 123(talk)10:35, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

I've actually been there and taken pictures ofPiss (Černý)myself. The statuesmove.Note also that the "pond" they stand in is the shape of a map of Czechia. In context, that's pretty bold, but apparently, it's still there.Gråbergs Gråa Sång(talk)10:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Onto awinning streamit seems.Martinevans123(talk)11:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia, how can you not love it.Gråbergs Gråa Sång(talk)11:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

I was somewhat surprised to see that Commons doesn't have a Category:Kitsch art, into which all these fine examples could be placed. Perhaps you two could toddle off there and create one!KJP1(talk)11:19, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Sounds like afun outing to the commons,but one which might prove a littletragic.$486,500!!Martinevans123(talk)11:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Nearly 1/2 a million dollars for that geegaw. It makes the five-figures people will pay for aThomas Kinkadeseem like a steal! There is indeed no accounting for taste.KJP1(talk)11:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

How about nearly 24 million for this:[9].Gråbergs Gråa Sång(talk)12:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Did you want a packet ofpork scratchingswith that, mate?Martinevans123(talk)12:29, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

They do haveCategory:Kitsch.Gråbergs Gråa Sång(talk)11:43, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

So they do. Why doesn't it come up when you put Kitsch in the search bar? And why do they not have any Kinkades! I suspect his estate is rather hot on copyright.KJP1(talk)11:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Oooh, am positivelyGreen (Lady)with envy!Martinevans123(talk)11:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Well... I guess this is what happens when one drinks a lot of beer. --Tryptofish(talk)22:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Yay!! (... although inOxford, Ohio,not China.)Martinevans123(talk)12:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Update:[10].And 2 threads atWikipedia:Administrative action review.Gråbergs Gråa Sång(talk)06:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

It's completely hopeless. They are certain they are right, and will not listen to/read any advice/guidance that attempts to show them why they are not. I can't see any other route forward beyond a Talk Page ban. Their appeals will go nowhere but are becoming a serious time-sink.KJP1(talk)10:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Yup.Gråbergs Gråa Sång(talk)10:48, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Some passion there.Gråbergs Gråa Sång(talk)06:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Yes. It’s a paradox that passion can sometimes be highly productive on here, and sometimes an absolute disaster. I fear we shall see a reappearance as a sock ‘ere long!KJP1(talk)08:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

A silver lining is that even behavior this like will bring some attention to the article in question, so it tends to get some "collateral" improvement. It's just a very pain-in-the-arse (what is "arse" in Shakespearean English? Probably "arse" ) way of doing things.Gråbergs Gråa Sång(talk)09:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Perhaps the Shakespearean for "arse" is "bare bodkin".--Tryptofish(talk)21:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

@Tryptofish- his continual punning on the word "ass" is much discussed in academic journals. The only use of "arse" that I can find is inRomeo and Juliet;"Oh that she were an open-arse, and thou a popp'rin pear".KJP1(talk)07:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Per Trypto's edit summary I now want to mention this: The name Shakespeare probably indicates "someone to be respected/not trifled with", imagine a soldier or farmer jabbing his spear at you. However, onecan,and funny-man Shakespeare likely knew this (taunts in school, perhaps?), read it as man waving his cod-dangle around in public. Or perhaps being the literal wanker. Could he have seen his coat of arms as, among other things, a good joke? If you haven't seen myShakespeare and Star Trekarticle, you might enjoy it.Gråbergs Gråa Sång(talk)07:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

"Star friggin' Trek, my arse"!Martinevans123(talk)15:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

It's so good to see so much scholarly thought going into keeping our editing brains up our arses. --Tryptofish(talk) 00:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)And I shouldn't admit this, but I didn't even realize I was making adouble entendrewhen I wrote that edit summary! --Tryptofish(talk)01:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Prose and trim

You bet!Thanks and well done. CheersDBaK(talk)21:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

@DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered- good to hear from you and I hope you are keeping well. Yes, but removing media trivia from country house articles is an activity akin to painting theForth Bridge.All the bestKJP1(talk)07:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Better weather though!! Stay in touch, please. All good wishesDBaK(talk)08:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Hope you are enjoying thenight shift.Martinevans123(talk)10:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Promotion ofGrade I listed buildings in England completed in the 20th century

Congratulations, KJP1! The list you nominated,Grade I listed buildings in England completed in the 20th century,has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. Thenomination discussionhas been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you maynominate itto appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers,PresN(talk) viaFACBot(talk)12:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, KJP1. I'm just posting to let you know thatGrade I listed buildings in England completed in the 20th century– a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page asToday's featured listfor June 14. The TFL blurb can be seenhere.If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or atTFL talk.Regards,Giants2008(Talk)00:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Old Gwernyfed

There's a lot more information about the history here, for instance. Would it help if I translated it into English?https://cylchgronau.llyfrgell.cymru/view/1380216/1382797/141#?xywh=-922%2C812%2C4611%2C2282

By the way, in my opinion the grid reference is useful, as it is more accessible than the latitude and longitude, and in particular in this article it serves to differentiate it from the new building (now the school).Ehrenkater(talk)14:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Ehrenkater- If you had time to undertake the translation, that would be extremely helpful. Then, either add the additional information yourself, or paste it on the Talkpage, and I'll add it. Given the estate's very long history, I'm quite sure a great deal could be added. I get your point about the grid reference, and indeed edit conflicted with you when I was trying to addThree Cocksas the closest village, though you're right that Felindre is closer toOldGwernyfed! But to me it still looks rather odd in the lead. I've seen it appear in IBs, we could put it there? All the best.KJP1(talk)14:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

p.s. - I shall also scour the Pevsner for materials, when I can find it! I've left it there for now as a reminder to do so.KJP1(talk)14:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

OK, will put it in the talk page. It would prob need quite a lot more work on it before it could be added to the article.

Yes, the grid reference is useful, but it doesn't need to be in the lead if you'd prefer to put it somewhere else in the article.Ehrenkater(talk)08:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

18 years in...

...and I am in my very first edit-war situation. Who thought bungaroosh could be so contentious?! Thanks for today's tweaks. More eyes on the developing situation would be appreciated; our unHappy Potter is really not having it, and it has the potential to turn rather nasty. PS I was delighted to seeGrade I listed buildings in England completed in the 20th centuryreaching its deserved FL status. I will have a chance to explore the interior of Hampstead Garden Suburb Free Church later this month on a tour, so I will make sure to take plenty of interior pics to add to the category. Cheers,Hassocks5489(Floreat Hova!)15:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Hassocks5489- Think yourself lucky! The approach is extraordinary. It’s like walking into a completely unfamiliar bar, loudly declaring the beer to be shit and the customers idiots, and then being surprised that no one offers to buy you a drink. If they’d only asked nicely, I’m sure a civil discussion could have been had. I strongly suspect they have a personal interest. Shall certainly keep an eye on it. Glad you liked the C.20th Grade Is. It was fun to do. At some point somebody will have a much quicker task in listing the C.21st ones. I envy you the Hampstead churches. Like the Elizabeth almshouses, I fear I may only ever see them in pictures. All the best.KJP1(talk)18:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)At least it's shit! Could beworse... The wonderfulSlim Dusty,andGordon Parsons.Fair dinkum!Martinevans123(talk)18:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

And for those who prefer theHigh cultureversion…KJP1(talk)18:39, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

OMG! Just because you detesta-pickin' an' a-strummin', y'all.EveryAndré Rieuconcert comes with a health warning and a bumper-sized box of tissues. (But yes, he does bring great joy to many thousands of Europeans!)Martinevans123(talk)18:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

You would be very welcome to join us on 29th June!(I went into a pub with no beer in Hastings once, back in the days before I researched pubs carefully before going anywhere. I walked straight out...)Hassocks5489(Floreat Hova!)20:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Hassocks5489- Thank you so much. That would have been a splendid day out. Unfortunately, a recent relocation makes it impossible. But have a great day, and I do look forward to seeing the pictures. The bungaroosh guy’s latest post did at least have the benefit of civility.KJP1(talk)05:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Why?

Why did you remove my talk page message?Edward Jocob Philip Smith(talk)07:51, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Edward Jocob Philip Smith- a few things:

• Any editor can remove items fromtheir own Talkpage.I did so with your message as I did not intend to reply to it. You did so onyour Talkpagewith my message reminding you of theWP:Checkuserfunction;
• Editors shouldnotgenerally remove messagesfrom other editors' Talkpages.You have done this here,[11]and you have done it here,User talk:212.250.203.150,without any explanation.[12]Why did you remove posts from the Talkpage of IP 212.250.203.150?
• That IP also posted a fake message on my Talkpage,[13]purporting to be fromUser:Kuru- which it wasn't - and which was helpfully removed byUser:RegentsPark.Do you know why that IP posted the fake message on my page immediately after you posted?
• That IP also has an obsession with the placement of the "Sir" prefix,[14].You have the same obsession,[15].Would you like to explain the similarity?
• In my 17 years on here I've never asked another editornotto post on my page. As a general rule, I think discussion between editors is to be encouraged. But in your case, I am going to make an exception.Please do not post here again,unless it is to truthfully answer the questions above, or to raise a specific issue regarding an article we both watch.KJP1(talk)09:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

John Innes Elliott

Hola! Hope you're well! It was all going so well, buildings wise, until this chap took over as the Met's surveyor in 1947. A sign of the times, perhaps, but he was responsible for so many of the brutalist, not to mention, forgettable, stations we still see dotted around London. The seventh to hold the surveyorship, and, for me, where it all started to go wrong (although hisbuilding in Park Lane, Croydon,was perhaps his best). I was thinking of your Essex surveyors work (Stock, Hopper, et al...) - was there a category for them?Cassianto^Talk16:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

And very good to see you back! (A pleasant change from my recent stalker.) No, his works lack a certain something... like any attempt at charm, elegance, harmony or even style. As to categories, you mean something like "Essex County surveyors". No, I'm not aware of such. It would seem to me that, for this chap and others, you could legitimately create a Metropolitan Police surveyors cat. You've got Butler, Trench, this chap - were any of the others notable?KJP1(talk)16:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Good grief, sorry to hear that. The internet is full of them, sadly. Thank you, although my time here is rather limited, unfortunately; I have a stack of things I'd like to get done, but just can't find the time. All of the Met's architects, up until Elliott, seem to have been notable. Fortunately, Pevsner lists them in London 5: East, which is a big help. The first wasReeves,followed briefly bySorby,who later invented theSkylight); then there was a chap called Frederick Caiger (no WP article); the Butlers (father and son) succeeded, separately, with the latter needing no introduction. The oldest buildings the Met still own are ones attributable to Butler Snr;PeckhamandColdharbour.Trench, with his preference for moderne/art deco, I would say, was the last notable architect; it was his design of the police telephone box that led to a certain doctor's Tardis. I have no idea how to create a cat, but it would be a good place to keep a record on them.Cassianto^Talk19:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

@CassiantoOh, it's no issue. Just a kid. Let me see what I can do on the cat.KJP1(talk)20:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

So, I've created a Cat, Metropolitan Police Surveyors, as a sub-cat of British Architects. It seems a legit sub-cat to me. It's a distinct office, and four holders are sufficiently notable to have their own articles. It raises an interesting question around County Surveyors. I don't know enough about the role, but I suspect it was common in Victorian England. And there are certainly some notable officeholders. I'll have a look.KJP1(talk)21:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

This place never ceases to amaze; we have quite a well-sourced, if rather detail-light and US-focused, article,County surveyor.KJP1(talk)21:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Cathedral Close

Hi, just a reminder that when you finish your edits in this section, remove the 'in use' tag. If you are going to continue with other sections, better if you put it at the top of the article. RegardsMurgatroyd49(talk)11:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Oops, I see you've done it, apologies.Murgatroyd49(talk)11:09, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Murgatroyd49- no problem. It took me slightly longer than planned, as both the HE and the British Buildings Online maps were being difficult! Now, what we need is a nice view of part of the close. Any suggestions?KJP1(talk)12:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately I was there about a month ago, took my grand-daughter to see Magna Carta, but didn't take a camera. Next time I'm passing I will see what I can do.Murgatroyd49(talk)12:09, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Murgatroyd49- That would be excellent. Commons has many images of individual buildings, but I'm not finding one that gives the desired sense of space/sweep. It is the largest close in the country, after all. Very much appreciated.KJP1(talk)12:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Bosanquet

Apologies for not replying for so long but I just spotted your message from last September (following up on your recent experience with a sockpuppeteer who has also gone after me which I did not realise until now...)

I had a look through British Newspaper Archive. Temple married the sister of Lady Bosanquet which made the owner of the house his brother-in-law (at least it's what I think I gleaned). He stayed there in January 1932 and preached at the parish church; he also stayed there in January 1934 (and preached at the local church), and in January 1941. If you want I can provide you the newspaper refs.Atchom(talk)15:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Atchom- Hi, and thanks for getting back. If you were able to provide the refs, that would be very helpful. I think it’s quite notable that the ArchB of York, later ABC, stayed at the court and preached at the church, so I’d like to put something into theDingestow Courtarticle.

Re. the sock; yes, while a fair amount of slack can be allowed for their immaturity, they were rather irritating. All the best and thanks again.KJP1(talk)05:17, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, KJP1. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You canat any time by removing the{{You've got mail}}or{{ygm}}template.Doug Wellertalk20:40, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Uploading more images soon today for Pinxton Castle

Doug Wellertalk13:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Done. Couldn't get the caption to link to the article though.Doug Wellertalk13:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Doug Weller- Think the link to Commons is working now. The images are great. Personally, I’d swap one for the Lidar map in the info box. The map is useful, and could be placed elsewhere, but it’s not a very arresting image!

Appreciate the offer to share the DYK nomination, but I’ve never really got my head round that area, so very happy that the credit is yours, as it should be. Hope all is going as well as it can IRL.KJP1(talk)17:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

I agree about the map. I’m not good with images. What was your plan to use the metadata?Doug Wellertalk18:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)