User talk:Rajibarber

Welcome!

Hi Rajibarber, welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for reaching out! What do you mean by "safe" on Wikipedia? You can check outHelp:Introductionfor a tutorial for new editors to help you learn the policies and guidelines here. In general, it's good to pay attention to not disclosing more personal information than you want to disclose, because most activity on Wikipedia is completely public, but I don't know of other safety concerns really.Dreamyshade(talk)14:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks, dearDreamyshade

By Safe, Imean without being kicked out of the platform and You have really responded to that.

I should still getback to you on any concerns in the furure.

RegardsRajibarber(talk)14:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Olamide Subulade Alao-Akala(June 29)

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creationhas been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not showsignificantcoverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject inpublished,reliable,secondarysources that areindependentof the subject (see theguidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (seetechnical helpand learn aboutmistakes to avoidwhen addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia'sminimum standard for inline citations.Pleaseciteyour sources usingfootnotes.For instructions on how to do this, please seeReferencing for beginners.Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Olamide Subulade Alao-Akalaand click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behaviorassociated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk,on thereviewer's talk pageor useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing(talk)06:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,Rajibarber! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk.If you have anyotherquestions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse,a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!DoubleGrazing(talk)06:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello Rajibarber. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made toDraft:Olamide Subulade Alao-Akala,gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia'smandatory paid editing disclosure requirements.Paid advocacy is a category ofconflict of interest(COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests.Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia.Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies onneutral point of viewand whatWikipedia is not,and is an especially serious type of COI; theWikimedia Foundationregards it as a "black hat" practice akin toblack-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on thetalk pageof the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through thearticles for creationprocess, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you arerequiredby theWikimedia Terms of Useto disclose your employer, client and affiliation.You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page atUser:Rajibarber.The template{{Paid}}can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:{{paid|user=Rajibarber|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}.If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case,do not edit furtheruntil you answer this message.DoubleGrazing(talk)06:51, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Dear @DoubleGrazing,

I feel honored having you as my reviewer, and thanks for the good job done.

Truth be told, I am expected to receive a compensation for this particular edit/creation, that's not my major motivating factor for its creation though. On this, I should follow your directive to include: {{paid|user=Rajibarber|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}} in the specified template, and on my user page.

It is about stating the character as a fact of history in her local environment such that the younger generations could know that it is possible to rise through diligent hard-work and consistency and not through just by "any means" that is devised on a daily basis.

Forward, I sincerely wanted to take time and learn all the ropes of what works on Wikipedia till my last breathe. Being a trained cultural historian myself, I know there are a lot to learn on this platform, and maybe much more to give back.

Aside the guidelines you gave above Dear erudite, what best ways do you think I can have a safe stay on Wikipedia without running foul of the guidelines

Regards.Rajibarber(talk)20:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfCnotification:Draft:Olamide Subulade Alao-Akalahas a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed atDraft:Olamide Subulade Alao-Akala.Thanks!Theroadislong(talk)15:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are appreciated Dear @Theroadislong

I would check that ASAP.

Regards.Rajibarber(talk)15:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfCnotification:Draft:Olamide Subulade Alao-Akalahas a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed atDraft:Olamide Subulade Alao-Akala.Thanks!Theroadislong(talk)15:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked that, Dear @Theroadislong.

It is well noted, I shall make amends.

Any other?Rajibarber(talk)16:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have beenblockedindefinitelyfrom editing forabusing multiple accountsas a sockpuppet ofUser:Sofiyulahper the evidence presented atWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sofiyulah.Note that multiple accounts areallowed,butnot forillegitimatereasons,and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may berevertedordeleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia'sguide to appealing blocks,then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.The Wordsmith^{Talk to me}19:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]