User talk:Worshipper007

Joshua Jonathan is gay

Welcome!

Hi Worshipper007! Are you trying to create a new Wikipedia article? New editors generally can't create new articles right away - it's best to use the "Articles for Creation" process described atHelp:Your first article,so that other editors can help make sure your draft is ready for publication.Dreamyshade(talk)21:52, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Can you help me in creating a article and how to apply any photo in article and how to change the sandbox name from User: Worshipper007 sandbox to another.Worshipper007(talk)07:09, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

The Sanatana Dharmamoved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions toThe Sanatana Dharma.Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing becauseit has no sourcesandit needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Hey man im josh(talk)14:44, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions,such as the edit(s) you made toSanātana Dharma,did not appear to be constructive and have beenreverted.Please take some time to familiarise yourself with ourpolicies and guidelines.You can find information about these at ourwelcome pagewhich also provides further information aboutcontributing constructively to this encyclopedia.If you only meant to make test edits, please useyour sandboxfor that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message onmy talk page.Thank you.Joshua Jonathan-Let's talk!15:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did atSanātana Dharma.Your edits appear to bedisruptiveand have been or will bereverted.

• If you are engaged in an articlecontent disputewith another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or thearticle's talk page,and seekconsensuswith them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia'sdispute resolutionpage, and ask for independent help at one of therelevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia'sAdministrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia'spolicies and guidelines,and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result inloss of editing privileges.Thank you.Joshua Jonathan-Let's talk!14:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop yourdisruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an articlecontent disputewith another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or thearticle's talk page,and seekconsensuswith them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia'sdispute resolutionpage, and ask for independent help at one of therelevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia'sAdministrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did atSanātana Dharma,you may beblocked from editing.Joshua Jonathan-Let's talk!19:18, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related toIndia,Pakistan,andAfghanistan,a topic designated ascontentious.This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics anddoesnotimply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics.These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefullyandconstructively,refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsproceduresyou may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboardor you may learn more about this contentious topichere.You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}}template.

You have recently made edits related toIndia,Pakistan,andAfghanistan.This is a standard message to inform you thatIndia,Pakistan,andAfghanistanis a designated contentious topic. This messagedoesnotimply that there are any issues with your editing.For more information about the contentious topics system, please seeWikipedia:Contentious topics.

Your submission atArticles for creation:The Sanatana Dharma(April 25)

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creationhas been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:The Sanatana Dharmaand click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behaviorassociated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk,on thereviewer's talk pageor useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing(talk)16:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello,Worshipper007! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk.If you have anyotherquestions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse,a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!DoubleGrazing(talk)16:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

How Wikipedia works

Hi Worshipper007. Instead of repeating the warnings untill you're blocked, I may better give you some advice. Wikipedia summarizes scholarly points of view, written by established scholars and published by reliable publishers; seeWP:RS.When you add info which is disputed, you should give a reference to such a source. If you dn't, and your info is repeatedly removed, while warnings are issued to you, you'll probbaly be blocked from editing Wikipdia.Joshua Jonathan-Let's talk!08:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Mauryan leadersmoved to draftspace

An article you recently created,Mauryan leaders,is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?)Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiabilityis ofcentral importanceon Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace(with a prefix of "Draft:"before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guidelineand thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Mccapra(talk)16:55, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Sanatan Dharma followersmoved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions toSanatan Dharma followers.Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing becauseit has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.​​​​​​​Dusrekikaammaitangaranewala𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk!}13:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Kylie had reviewed your submission and saying about sources.

Your submission atArticles for creation:Sanatan Dharma followers(May 16)

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creationhas been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Sanatan Dharma followersand click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behaviorassociated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk,on thereviewer's talk pageor useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing(talk)06:35, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions,such as the edit(s) you made toUser talk:Worshipper007,did not appear to be constructive and have beenreverted.Please take some time to familiarise yourself with ourpolicies and guidelines.You can find information about these at ourwelcome pagewhich also provides further information aboutcontributing constructively to this encyclopedia.If you only meant to make test edits, please useyour sandboxfor that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message onmy talk page.Your talkpage is in userspace, nevertheless an edit ike thisdiffis unacceptable; it comes close toWP:NOTHERE.Take care; if you continue like this you probably will be blocked.Joshua Jonathan-Let's talk!05:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Joshua Jonathan-Let's talk!05:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

@Doug WellerandRegentsPark:time for a blockdiff.Joshua Jonathan-Let's talk!09:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

You have beenblockedindefinitelyfrom editing forabuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read theguide to appealing blocks,then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.RegentsPark(comment)13:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regardingDraft:Mauryan leaders

Hello, Worshipper007. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Mauryan leaders,a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted,so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit itagain orrequestthat it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeletedso you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot(talk)17:04, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article,Draft:Mauryan leaders

Hello, Worshipper007. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creationsubmission orDraftpage you started, "Mauryan leaders".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace,the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion.An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!17:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)