Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CarX Street

CarX Street

[Hide this box] New toArticles for deletion(AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources:Google(books·news·scholar·free images·WP refs)·FENS·JSTOR·TWL)

Non-notable pergeneral notability.Aquick lookusingthe search enginefinds no additional significant coverage beyond the already cited Multiplayer.it review and a briefly descriptiveGRYentry. There just isn't enough here to establish a notable article. Was going to draftify but it looks like a draft already exists. Also thought about amergebut it looks like no other CarX titles or the franchise itself has an article.ＶＲＸＣＥＳ(talk)07:24, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Video games-related deletion discussions.ＶＲＸＣＥＳ(talk)07:24, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteNot a notable game. The creator should be on notice that advertising is not allowed on Wikipedia and multiple reliable sources are required for an article.ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ(ᴛ)09:59, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
what do you mean "advertising"? i have no connection with CarX...DB554(talk)11:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- non-notable game of a non-notable series.'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''(talk•contribs)13:40, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A review of Russian sources on ruwiki please.Playground.ruhas a list of the series with articles.IgelRM(talk)20:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can take a closer look, but a brief skim ofthe pageindicates there's no reception section or reviews of the game. One source that appears to do so is just conveying quotes from Steam user reactions which is just a secondary form ofWP:USERG.ＶＲＸＣＥＳ(talk)21:09, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Found a mention in aPwC report,aNintendoWorldReportreview of CarX Highway Racing andracinggames.gg(Gfinity) review.IgelRM(talk)23:35, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeleteDoesn't appear to have sources that meet the standard forWP:SIGCOV.Shooterwalker(talk)00:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]