Wooden iron
 | This article includes alist of references,related reading,orexternal links,but its sources remain unclear because it lacksinline citations.(July 2010) |
| Part ofa serieson |
| Rhetoric |
|---|
 |
Wooden iron(German:hölzernes Eisen) is apolemicalterm often used in philosophicalrhetoricto describe the impossibility of an opposing argument. The term is a German proverbialoxymoron,which synthesizes the concept of the "wooden", which isorganic,with the concept of "iron" which isinorganic.Such acontradictio in adjectois a logical inconsistency. It occurs when a modifying adjective opposes its noun, as in "square circle," "freezing fire," "boiling snow," or "hard liquid."
Overview[edit]
Arthur Schopenhauerused the term inThe World as Will and Representation(1819) in his critiques ofImmanuel Kant.For his argument against absolutes he wrote "... the categorical imperative leaps into the world, in order to command there with its unconditioned ought—a scepter of wooden iron." (See Payne's trans., WWR 1:523.) His chapter titled "On the Fundamental View of Idealism" further describes his position onsubjectivityby using the term to demonstrate the difference between "the representation of the intellect" and the "subject" itself. In this imaginary dialogue between intellect and matter he wrote, as intellect speaking to matter: "Whoever thinks me away, and then believes he can still think of you, is involved in a gross delusion; for your existence outside my representation is a direct contradiction, a wooden-iron." (See Payne's trans., WWR 2:17.)
Friedrich Nietzsche, who was an avid Schopenhauer scholar, continued to employ the term throughout his writings in the latter half of the 19th century. Nietzsche's experience withphilologyalso brought new meaning to the term. He attackedMoritz Carrière's so-called "real idealism" (see Notebooks Fall 1873—Winter 1873-74 30[16]). He used it to describeRichard Wagner's "infinite melody" (see Notebooks Fall 1881 11[198]). He also considered "unegoistic actions" and "unegoistic drives" to be examples of wooden iron (see Notebooks Summer-Fall 1884 26[224]). He similarly dismissed philosophical concepts of "pure knowledge" and "thing in itself" (see Notebooks Summer-Fall 1884 26[413]). The term was also employed in his poetic attempts to criticize socialism and the building of a "free society" (see Book 5 ofThe Gay Science,§356).