Jump to content

Young Ireland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromYoung Irelander)

Young Ireland
Founded1842
Dissolved1849
Preceded byRepeal Association
Succeeded byTenant Right League,Irish Republican Brotherhood
NewspaperThe Nation
IdeologyIrish nationalism
Liberalism
Radicalism[1]
Land reform
National affiliationRepeal Association(1842–1847)
Irish Confederation(1847–1848)
ColoursGreen, White and Orange
SloganA Nation Once Again
Part ofa serieson
Radicalism
History
Ideas
People
Groups
By region
Related

Young Ireland(Irish:Éire Óg,IPA:[ˈeːɾʲəˈoːɡ]) was apoliticalandculturalmovement in the 1840s committed to an all-Ireland struggle for independence and democratic reform. Grouped around the Dublin weeklyThe Nation,it took issue with the compromises andclericalismof the larger national movement,Daniel O'Connell'sRepeal Association,from which it seceded in 1847. Despairing, in the face of theGreat Famine,of any other course, in 1848 Young Irelanders attempted an insurrection. Following the arrest and the exile of most of their leading figures, the movement split between those who carried the commitment to "physical force" forward into theIrish Republican Brotherhood,and those who sought to build a "League of North and South" linking anindependent Irish parliamentary partyto tenant agitation for land reform.

Origins[edit]

The Historical Society[edit]

Many of those later identified as Young Ireland first gathered in 1839 at a reconvening of theCollege Historical Societyin Dublin. The club atTrinity Collegehad a history, stretching back through the student participation of theUnited IrishmenTheobald Wolfe ToneandRobert EmmettoEdmund Burke,of debating patriotic motions. Not for the first time, the club had been expelled from college for breaching the condition that it not discuss questions of "modern politics".[2]

Those present for meeting in the chambers of Francis Kearney were, in Irish terms, a "mixed" group. They included Catholics (first admitted to Trinity in 1793), among themThomas MacNevin,elected the Society's president, and (later to follow him in that role)John Blake Dillon.Chief among the other future Young Irelanders present were law graduateThomas Davis,and theNewryattorneyJohn Mitchel.[3]

The Repeal Association[edit]

With others present, these four would go to joinDaniel O'Connell'sRepeal Association.In 1840 this was a relaunch of a campaign to restore an Irish parliament in Dublin by repealing the1800 Acts of Union.O'Connell had suspended Repeal agitation in the 1830s to solicit favour and reform fromWhigministry ofLord Melbourne.

In April 1841 O’Connell placed both Davis and Dillon on the Association's General Committee with responsibilities for organisation and recruitment. Membership uptake had been slow.[4]

In the south and west, the great numbers of tenant farmers, small-town traders and journeymen O'Connell had rallied to the cause ofEmancipationin the 1820s did not similarly respond to his lead on the more abstract proposition of Repeal.[5][6]Patriotic and republican sentiment among the Presbyterians of the north-east had surrendered, since theRebellion of 1798,to the conviction that the union with Great Britain was both the occasion for their relative prosperity and a guarantee of their liberty.[7]Protestants were now, as a body, opposed to a restoration of the parliament in Dublin whose prerogatives they had once championed. In these circumstances, the Catholic gentry and much of the middle class were content to explore the avenues for advancement opened by Emancipation and earlier"Catholic relief".The suspicion, in any case, was that O'Connell's purpose in returning to the constitutional question was merely to embarrass the incomingConservatives(under his old enemy SirRobert Peel) and to hasten the Whigs return.[5]

In working with O'Connell, Thomas and Dillon contended with a patriarch "impatient of opposition or criticism, and apt to prefer followers to colleagues". They found an ally inCharles Gavan Duffy,editor inBelfastof the Repeal journalThe Vindicator.[5]

The Nation[edit]

Charles Gavan Duffy

Duffy proposed a new national weekly to Davis and Dillon, owned by himself but directed by all three. The paper first appeared in October in 1842 bearing the title chosen for it by Davis,The Nation,after the French liberal-opposition dailyLe National.The prospectus, written by Davis, dedicated the paper "to direct the popular mind and the sympathies of educated men of all parties to the great end of [a] nationality" that will "not only raise our people from their poverty, by securing to them the blessings of a domestic legislature, but inflame and purify them with a lofty and heroic love of country".[8]

The Nationwas an immediate publishing success. Its sales soared above all other Irish papers, weekly or daily. Circulation at its height was reckoned to be close to a quarter of a million.[9]With its focus upon editorials, historical articles and verse, all intended to shape public opinion, copies continued to be read in Repeal Reading Rooms and to be passed from hand to hand long after their current news value had faded.[5]It may have been a "reinforcement for which O’Connell had scarcely dared to hope",[10]but the journal's role in the revived fortunes of the Repeal Association has to be weighed against other contributions. Legislative independence was powerfully endorsed byArchbishop McHale of Tuam.[4][11]

Beyond Davis and Dillon's Historical Society companions, the paper drew on a widening circle of contributors. Among the more politically committed these included: the Repeal MPWilliam Smith O'Brien;Tithe WarveteranJames Fintan Lalor;prose and verse writerMichael Doheny;author ofTraits and Stories of the Irish Peasantry,William Carleton;militant-nationalist priest,John Kenyon;poet and earlysuffragistJane Wilde;republican and labour-rights activistThomas Devin Reilly;former American journalist (and future "Father of theCanadian Confederation")Thomas D'Arcy McGee;and the renowned Repeal oratorThomas Francis Meagher.

It was an English journalist who first applied to this growing circle the label "Young Ireland".[5]Although there was no direct connection, the reference was toYoung Italyand to other European national-republican movements (Young Germany, Young Poland... ) thatGiuseppe Mazzinihad sought loosely to federate under the aegis of "Young Europe" (Giovine Europa). When O'Connell picked up on the moniker and began referring to those he had considered his junior lieutenants as "Young Irelanders" it was a signal for an impending break.[12]

Conflicts with O'Connell[edit]

Depiction of Young Ireland (Smith O'Brien) and Old Ireland (O'Connell) fighting like twoKilkenny cats(Punch,1846)

Retreat from Repeal[edit]

The Nationwas loyal to O'Connell when, in October 1843, he stood down the Repeal movement atClontarf.The government had deployed troops and artillery to enforce a ban on what O'Connell had announced as the last "monster meeting" in the Year of Repeal. (In August at theHill of Taracrowds had been estimated in the hostile reporting ofThe Timesat close to a million).[13]O'Connell submitted at once. He cancelled the rally and sent out messengers to turn back the approaching crowds.[14]

Although in Duffy's view, the decision deprived the Repeal movement of "half its dignity and all of its terror", the Young Irelanders acknowledged that the risk of a massacre on many times the scale of"Peterloo"was unacceptable. Pressing what they imagined was their advantage, the government had O'Connell, his son John and Duffy convicted of sedition. When after three months (the charges quashed on appeal to theHouse of Lords) they were released, it was Davis and O'Brien who staged O'Connell's triumphal reception in Dublin.[15]

The first sign of a breach came when Duffy through an open letter inThe NationDuffy pressed O'Connell to affirm Repeal as his object.[16]While insisting he would "never ask for or work" for anything less than an independent legislature, O'Connell had suggested he might accept a "subordinate parliament" (an Irish legislature with powersdevolvedfrom Westminster) as "an instalment".[17]

A further, and more serious, rift opened with Davis. Davis had himself been negotiating the possibility of a devolved parliament with the Northern reformerWilliam Sharman Crawford.[18]The difference with O'Connell was that Davis was seeking a basis for compromise, in the first instance, not at Westminster but in Belfast.

Protestant inclusion[edit]

Thomas Davis

When he first followed O'Connell, Duffy concedes that he had "burned with the desire to set up again theCeltic raceand the catholic church ".[5]InThe Nationhe subscribed to a broader vision. In the journal's prospectus, Davis wrote of a "nationality" as ready to embrace "the stranger who is within our gates" as "the Irishman of a hundred generations".[8]

Davis (conscious of his family'sCromwellianorigin) was persuaded byJohann Gottfried von Herder:nationality was not a matter of ancestry or blood but of acclimatising influences. Cultural traditions, and above all language, "the organ of thought", could engender in persons of diverse origin common national feeling.[19]

Davis was a keen promoter of theIrish languagein print, at a time when, while still the speech of the vast majority of the Irish people, it had been all but abandoned by the educated classes. Such cultural nationalism did not appear to interest to O'Connell. There is no evidence that he saw the preservation or revival of his mother tongue, or any other aspect of "native culture", as essential to his political demands.[20]His own paper, thePilot,recognised but one "positive and unmistakable" marker of the national distinction between English and Irish—religion.[21]

O'Connell "treasured his few Protestant Repealers",[22]but he acknowledged the central role of the Catholic clergy in his movement and guarded the bond it represented. In 1812/13 he had refused emancipation conditioned on Rome having to seek royal assent in the appointment of Irish bishops.[23][24]Throughout much of the country the bishops and their priests were the only figures of standing independent of the government around which a national movement could organise. It was a reality on which the Repeal Association, like theCatholic Associationbefore it, was built.[25][26]

In 1845 O'Connell,in advanceof the bishops, denounced a "mixed" non-denominational scheme for tertiary education. The Anglicans could retain Trinity in Dublin; the Presbyterians might have the Queens College proposed for Belfast; but the Queens colleges intended forGalwayandCorkhad to be Catholic. When Davis (moved to tears in the controversy) pleaded that "reasons for separate education are reasons for [a] separate life", O'Connell accused him of suggesting it a "crime to be a Catholic". "I am", he declared, "for Old Ireland, and I have some slight notion that Old Ireland will stand by me".[27][28]

Thomas Francis Meagher

O'Connell rarely joined the Young Irelanders in invoking thememory of 1798,the union of "Catholic, Protestant and Dissenter". His one Repeal foray to the Presbyterian north (to Belfast), organised by Duffy in 1841, was cut short by hostile demonstrations. For the key to an Irish parliament, O'Connell looked to liberal England, not Protestant Ulster. Once a parliament restored to Dublin had retired their distinctive privileges, he was content to suggest that Protestants would, "with little delay, melt into the overwhelming majority of the Irish nation".[29]

Whig concessions[edit]

Thomas Davis's sudden death in 1845 helped close the matter. But his friends suspected that behind the vehemence with which O'Connell opposed Davis on the colleges question there also the intent, again, to frustrate Peel and to advantage the Whigs. This was not a strategy, Meagher argued, that had paid national dividends. The last concession wrung from the Melbourne administration, the 1840 municipal reform, had elected O'Connell to the Lord Mayoralty of Dublin. But with the Grand Jury system of county government untouched, it left the great majority of people to continue under the local tyranny of the landlords. In return for allowing a "corrupt gang of politicians who fawned on O'Connell" an extensive system of political patronage, the Irish people being "purchased back into factious vassalage".[30][31]

In June 1846 the Whigs, underLord John Russell,returned to office. Immediately they set about dismantling Peel's limited, but practical, efforts to relieve the gatheringIrish Famine.[32]Barricaded behindlaissez-fairedoctrines of "political economy", the government left O'Connell to plead for his country from the floor of theHouse of Commons:"She is in your hands—in your power. If you do not save her, she cannot save herself. One-fourth of her population will perish unless Parliament comes to their relief".[33]A broken man, on the advice of his doctors O'Connell took himself to the continent where, on route to Rome, he died in May 1847.

The Peace Resolutions[edit]

James Fintan Lalor

In the months before O'Connell's death, Duffy circulated letters received fromJames Fintan Lalor.[34]In these Lalor argued independence could be pursued only in a popular struggle for the land. This alone could bring about a union of North and South, without which separation from England was impossible to contemplate. But recognising that "any and all means" that employed in this struggle could be made "illegal by Act of Parliament", the Young Irelanders would have, at the very least, to ready themselves for a "moral insurrection". He proposed that they should begin with a campaign to withhold rent, but more might be implied.[35]Parts of the country were already in a state of semi-insurrection. Tenants conspirators, in tradition of the Whiteboys and Ribbonmen, were attacking process servers, intimidating land agents, and resisting evictions. Lalor advised only against ageneraluprising: the people, he believed, could not hold their own against the country's English garrison.[36]

The letters made a profound impression, particularly onJohn MitchelandFather John Kenyon.[37]When the conservativeStandardobserved that the new Irish railways could be used to transport troops to quickly curb agrarian unrest, Mitchel responded that the tracks could be turned into pikes and trains ambushed. O’Connell publicly distanced himself fromThe Nation,appearing to some to set Duffy, as the editor, up for prosecution.[38]When the courts failed to convict, O'Connell pressed the issue, seemingly intent on effecting a break.

In July 1846, the Repeal Association tabled resolutions declaring that under no circumstances was a nation justified in asserting its liberties by force of arms. Meagher argued that while the Young Irelanders were not advocating physical force, if Repeal could not be carried by moral persuasion and peaceful means they believed a resort to arms would be a no less honourable course.[39]In his O'Connell's absence, hisson Johnforced the decision: the resolution was carried on the threat of the O'Connells themselves quitting the Association.

An offer by United Irish veteran,Valentine Lawless(Lord Cloncurry) to chair a committee to adjust the dispute between Old and Young Ireland had been rejected by John O'Connell in reportedly "very saucy and unbecoming language".[40]An offer of mediation from the abolitionist and pacifistJames Haughtonwas also spurned.[41]

The Irish Confederation[edit]

Main article:Irish Confederation
Depiction inPunch(1846) of the split: "Young Ireland in Business for Himself", Smith O'Brien in Repeal cap sells weapons to a stereotyped Irishman.

Secession[edit]

The Young Irelanders withdrew from the Repeal Association, but not without considerable support. In October 1846, the Association chairman in Dublin was presented with a remonstrance protesting Young Irelanders exclusion signed by fifteen hundred of the city's leading citizens. When John O’Connell ordered this to be flung into the gutter, a large protest meeting was held,[42]suggesting the possibility for a rival organisation. In January 1847, the seceders formed themselves as theIrish Confederation.Michael Dohenyrecalls "no declarations or calls for rebellion, and no pledges [given] of peace". The objectives were "independence of the Irish nation" with "no means to attain that end abjured, save such as were inconsistent with honour, morality and reason".[42]

In the shadow of the Famine[edit]

John Mitchel

As first directed by Duffy, in towns Confederate clubs were to encourage the use of Irish resources and manufactures, work for the extension of popular franchise, and instruct youth in the history of their country which was being kept from them in the government's National Schools. The village clubs were to promote the rights of tenants and labourers, diffuse knowledge of agriculture and—in token of the continuing commitment to non-violence—discourage secret societies. All were to promote harmony between Irishmen of all creeds, making it a point to invite the participation of Protestants.[43]But in "Black '47", the worst year of the potato-blight famine, the search was for policies that could address the immediate crisis.

The Confederation urged cultivators to hold the harvest until the needs of their own families were supplied. As Duffy was later to acknowledge, the poorest had lost the art and means of preparing for themselves anything other than the potato. Even were it not at the cost of eviction, holding back grain and other foodstuffs grown to pay rent might avail them little.[44]As "temporary relief for destitute persons", in the spring of 1847 the government opened soup kitchens. In August they were shut. The starving were directed to abandon the land and apply to the workhouses.[45]

Mitchel urged the Confederation to pronounce for Lalor's policy and make control of land the issue. However, Duffy had cut Michel's access to the leader columns ofThe Nation'over a seemingly extraneous issue. In Duffy's view, Mitchel had abused a temporary editorship to take unsanctioned and, in themselves, scandalous positions on matters that had been sacrosanct to O'Connell. O'Connell had repeatedly assailed what he described as "the vile union" in the United States "of republicanism and slavery".[46][47]He had also criticisedPope Gregory XVIover the treatment of Jews in thePapal States.[48]Conscious of the risk to American funding and support, Duffy himself had difficulty with O'Connell's vocal abolitionism: the time was not right, he suggested, "for gratuitous interference in American affairs".[49]In articles written for the New York-basedNation,Mitchel espousedproslavery thoughtand opposedJewish emancipationin the United States.[50][51]His views were similar to many other Young Irelandémigréssuch asThomas D'Arcy McGee,who defended American slavery while espousing Irish nationalism.[52]

In February 1848 Mitchel established a paper of his own. Under its titleThe United Irishmanhe placedWolfe Tone's declaration: "Our independence must be had at all hazards. If the men of property will not support us, they must fall; we can support ourselves by the aid of that numerous and respectable class of the community, the men of no property".[53]The paper boldly advocated Lalor's policy. In May, as its publisher, Mitchel was convicted of a new crime oftreason felonyand sentenced to transportation for 14 years to theRoyal Naval DockyardonIreland Islandin the "Imperial fortress"ofBermuda(imprisoned in thePrison hulkHMS Dromedary),[54]andVan Diemen's Land.[55][56]

Land War or Parliamentary Obstruction[edit]

Duffy recalled from his youth aQuakerneighbour who had been a United Irishman and had laughed at the idea that the issue was kings and governments. What mattered was the land from which the people got their bread.[57]Instead of singing theLa Marseillaise,he said that what the men of '98 should have borrowed from the French was "their sagacious idea of bundling the landlords out of doors and putting tenants in their shoes".[58]But Duffy's objection to "Lalor's theory" was that "his angry peasants, chafing like chained tigers, were creatures of the imagination--not the living people through whom we had to act".[59]At the same time Duffy was trying to hold together a broader coalition, and had for that reason advanced O'Brien to the leadership, a Protestant and a landowner. On the Confederation's Council he was supported byPatrick James Smythwho argued that with propertied classes, as well as the priesthood opposed, the Confederation could not hope to call out a single parish in Ireland.[60]

By a vote of fifteen to six, the Council adopted Duffy's alternative proposition: a Parliamentary Party that, accepting no favours, would press Ireland's claims by threatening to put a stop to the entire business of theCommons.Such a party would either have its demands conceded, or be forcibly ejected from Westminster, in which case the people united behind its single purpose would know how to enforce their will. Opposition was led byThomas Devin Reillyand by Mitchel. Class coalitions attempted in past had failed, and they continued to insist on Lalor's plan.[61]

The path to insurrection[edit]

Depiction from Punch of "Mr. G. O'Rillaof the Young Ireland Party, "readingThe Nationwithpickled cabbageandvitriolin jars on his shelf. Apolicemanholds anextinguisherto snuff him out.

Duffy's Creed[edit]

By the spring of 1848, the scale of the catastrophe facing the country had persuaded all parties on the Council that independence was an existential issue; that the immediate need was for an Irish national government able to take control of national resources. In May 1848 Duffy published "The Creed of the Nation." If Irish independence was to come by force, it would be in the form of a Republic. The avoidance of deadly animosities between Irishmen was of course preferable.

An independent Irish parliament, elected by widest possible suffrage, a responsible minister for Ireland [i.e. an Irish executive accountable to an Irish parliament] aViceroyof Irish birth, would content the country... Such a parliament would inevitably establish Tenant Right, abolish the Established Church..., and endeavour to settle the claims of labour upon some solid and satisfactory basis. But one step further in the direction of Revolution... it would not go.[62]

Other peoples in Europe had been protected from starvation because their rulers were "of their own blood and race". That this was not the case for Ireland, was the source of its present tragedy.[63]

The Government made clear that its chosen response to the crisis in Ireland was coercion, not concession. Mitchel had been convicted under new martial law measures approved by Parliament (including by a number of "Old Ireland" MPs). On 9 July 1848 Duffy, with the Creed as evidence, was arrested for sedition. He managed to smuggle a few lines out toThe Nationbut the issue that would have carried his declaration, that there was no remedy now but the sword, was seized and the paper suppressed.[64]

1848 Uprising[edit]

Main article:Young Irelander Rebellion of 1848
William Smith O'Brien

Planning for an insurrection had already advanced. Mitchel, although the first to call for action, had scoffed at the necessity for systematic preparation. O'Brien, to Duffy's surprise, attempted the task. In March he had returned from a visit torevolutionary Pariswith hopes of French assistance. (Among the leading republicans in France,Ledru-Rollinhad been loud in his declaration of French support for the Irish cause).[65]There was also talk of an Irish-American brigade and of aChartistdiversion in England[66](Allied with the Chartists, the Confederation had a relatively strong organised presence inLiverpool,ManchesterandSalford).[67]With Duffy's arrest, it was left to O'Brien to confront the reality of the Confederates'domesticisolation.

Having with Meagher and Dillon gathered a small group of both landowners and tenants, on 23 July O'Brien raised the standard of revolt inKilkenny.[68]This was a tricolour he had brought back from France, its colours (green for Catholics, orange for Protestants) intended to symbolise the United Irish republican ideal.

With Old Ireland and rural priesthood against them, the Confederates had no organised support in the countryside.[69] Active membership was confined to the garrisoned towns. As O'Brien proceeded intoTipperaryhe was greeted by curious crowds, but found himself in command of only a few hundred ill-clad largely unarmed men. They scattered after their first skirmish with the constabulary, derisively referred to byThe Timesof London as "Battle of Widow McCormack's Cabbage Patch".[70]

O'Brien and his colleagues were quickly arrested and convicted of treason. Following a public outpouring, the government commuted their death sentences topenal transportationtoVan Diemen's Land,where they joinedJohn Mitchel.Duffy alone escaped conviction. Thanks to a token Catholic juror whose character the government had misjudged, and able defence ofIsaac Butt,Duffy was released in February 1849, the only major Young Ireland leader to remain in Ireland.[71]

In a judgement shared by many of their sympathisers,John Devoy,the laterFenian,wrote of the Young Irelander rebellion:

The terrible Famine of 1847 forced the hand of the Young Irelanders and they rushed into a policy of Insurrection without the slightest military preparation... Their writings and speeches had converted a large number of the young men to the gospel of force and their pride impelled them to an effort to make good their preaching. But... an appeal to arms made to a disarmed people was little short of insanity.[72]

James Connolly,however, was to argue that the response to arrest the Young Ireland leaders suggests that in the towns, people would have taken to arms if only the signal been given. He writes that when Duffy was arrested on July 9, Dublin workers surrounded the military escort, pressed up to Duffy and offered to begin an insurrection then and there. “Do you wish to be rescued?” “Certainly not,” said Duffy. InCashel,Tipperary, people stormed the jail and rescued Michael Doheny, only for him to give himself up again and apply for bail. InWaterford,people brought the cavalcade carrying Meagher to a standstill with a barricade across a narrow bridge over theRiver Suir.They begged him to give the word, for they had the town already in their hands, but Meagher persisted in going with the soldiers, and ordered the barricade removed.[73]

Aftermath[edit]

The League of North and South[edit]

Convinced that "the Famine had 'dissolved society' and exposed landlordism both morally and economically",[74]in September 1849 Lalor attempted withJohn Savage,Joseph Brenanand other Young Irelanders to revive the insurrection inTipperaryandWaterford.After an indecisive engagement atCappoquin,once again in view of their small number the insurgents disbanded.[37]Lalor died three months later of bronchitis. This was just as a new movement was lending new credence to his belief that the independence of cultivator would bring "national independence in its train".[75]

Tenant farmers andcottiersmay not have been prepared to fight for a republic, but with the formation of tenant protection societies they were beginning to see value in an open and legal combination for furtherance of their interests.[76]Seeking to link the new tenant agitation to his vision of an independent parliamentary party, in August 1850 Duffy, withJames McKnight,William Sharman CrawfordandFrederick Lucas,moved the formation of an all-IrelandTenant Right League.[77]In addition to tenant representatives, among those gathered for the inaugural meeting were magistrates and landlords, Catholic priests and Presbyterian ministers, and journalists with the Presbyterian James McKnight of theBanner of Ulsterin the chair.[78]

In the 1852 election, organised around whatMichael Davittdescribed as "the programme of theWhiteboysandRibbonmenreduced to moral and constitutional standards ",[79]the League helped return Duffy (forNew Ross) and 47 other MPs pledged to tenant-rights.[80]What Duffy hailed as the "League of North and South",[81]however, was less than it appeared. Many of the MPs had been sitting Repealers who had broken with the Whig government over theEcclesiastical Titles Act,and only one pledged MP,William KirkforNewry,was returned from Ulster.[82]

After a modest land bill was defeated in the Lords,[83]the "Independent Irish Party"began to unravel. CatholicPrimate of Ireland,ArchbishopPaul Cullenapproved the MPs breaking their pledge of independent opposition and accepting positions in a new Whig administration.[84]In the North McKnight and Crawford had their meetings broken up byOrange"bludgeon men".[85]

Broken in health and spirit, Duffy published in 1855 a farewell address to his constituency, declaring that he had resolved to retire from parliament, as it was no longer possible to accomplish the task for which he had solicited their votes. He emigrated to Australia.[86]From 1870 aLand LeagueandIrish Parliamentary Partyrealised the combination he had sought: coordinated agrarian agitation and obstructionist representation at Westminster.

Irish Republican Brotherhood[edit]

Some of the "Men of 1848" carried the commitment to physical force forward into theIrish Republican Brotherhood(IRB), formed in 1858 in Dublin, and in the sisterFenian Brotherhood(laterClan na Gael) established by Meagher and fellow exiles in the United States. In 1867, in a loosely co-ordinated action, the Fenians, mobilising Irish veterans of theAmerican Civil War,raided across the northern border of the United States with a view to holding Canada hostage to the grant of Irish Independence.[87]while the IRB attempted anarmed risingat home.[88]

With critical and continuing support from the Irish post-Famine diaspora in the United States, the IRB survived to play a critical role in raising the Young Irelander tricolour over Dublin in theEaster Risingof 1916.

Notable Young Irelanders[edit]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^Peter Billingham, ed. (2005).Radical Initiatives in Interventionist and Community Drama.Intellect.ISBN9781841500683.Active in the 1840s, Young Ireland was formed by radical intellectuals, and was influenced by the pan European nationalist movements of the period. The group launched an unsuccessful rising in 1848.
  2. ^Young Ireland,Sir Charles Gavan Duffy, Cassell, Petter, Galpin & Co 1880 pg.34
  3. ^Dennis Gwynn,Young Ireland and 1848,Cork University Press, 1949, pg 5
  4. ^abBeckett, J. C. (1966).Modern Ireland 1603-1923.London: Faber and Faber. p. 323.ISBN0571092675.
  5. ^abcdefMoody, T. W. (Autumn 1966)."Thomas Davis and the Irish nation".Hermathena(103): 11–12.JSTOR23039825.Archivedfrom the original on 22 September 2021.Retrieved3 September2020.
  6. ^Beckett (1966), p. 291
  7. ^Connolly, S.J. (2012). "Chapter 5: Improving Town, 1750–1820". In Connolly, S.J. (ed.).Belfast 400: People, Place and History.Liverpool University Press.ISBN978-1-84631-635-7.
  8. ^abBardon, Jonathan (2008).A History of Ireland in 250 Episodes.Dublin: Gill & Macmillan. p. 367.
  9. ^Foster, R. F. (1988).Modern Ireland 1600-1972.Allen Lane, Penguin. p. 311.ISBN0713990104.
  10. ^Dennis Gwynn,Young Ireland and 1848,Cork University Press, 1949, pg 9
  11. ^"British Library Catalogue entry".Archivedfrom the original on 22 September 2021.Retrieved3 September2020.
  12. ^Dennis Gwynn,O'Connell, Davis and the Colleges Bill,Cork University Press, 1948, p. 68
  13. ^Bardon, Jonathan (2008).A History of Ireland in 250 Episodes.Dublin: Gill & Macmillan. pp. 362–363.ISBN9780717146499.
  14. ^Beckett, J>C> (1966).The Making of Modern Ireland 1603-1923.London: Faber and Faber. pp. 323–327.ISBN0571092675.
  15. ^Duffy, Charles Gavan (1898).My life in two hemispheres, Volume 1.London: Fischer Unwin. pp. 95–97.Archivedfrom the original on 23 September 2021.Retrieved1 September2020.
  16. ^Duffy, Charles Gavan (1898).My life in two hemispheres, Volume 1.London: Fischer Unwin. p. 99.Archivedfrom the original on 23 September 2021.Retrieved1 September2020.
  17. ^Quoted inMacDonagh, Oliver (1977).Ireland: The Union and its Aftermath.London. p. 58.ISBN978-1-900621-81-6.{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  18. ^"Davis to R.R. Madden, March 1843 (Gaven Duffy Papers) quoted in Terence LaRocca (1974)" The Irish Career of Charles Gavan Duffy 1840-1855 ", Doctoral Dissertation, Loyola University Chicago, pp. 17-18. Loyola eCommons"(PDF).Archivedfrom the original on 23 September 2021.Retrieved3 September2020.
  19. ^Votruba, Martin."Herder on Language"(PDF).Slovak Studies Program.University of Pittsburgh.Archived(PDF)from the original on 24 November 2017.Retrieved30 June2010.
  20. ^Ó Tuathaigh, Gearóid (1975). "Gaelic Ireland, Popular Politics and Daniel O'Connell".Journal of the Galway Archaeological and Historical Society.34:21–34.JSTOR25535454.
  21. ^Beckett, J.C. (1966).The Making of Modern Ireland, 1603-1923.London: Faber & Faber. p. 332.ISBN0571092675.
  22. ^Foster, R.F. (1988).Modern Ireland, 1600-1972.London: Allen Lane. p. 317.ISBN0713990104.
  23. ^Clifford, Brendan (1985).The Veto Controversy.Belfast: Athol Books.ISBN9780850340303.
  24. ^Luby, Thomas Clarke (1870).The life and times of Daniel O'Connell.Glasgow: Cameron, Ferguson & Company. p. 418.Archivedfrom the original on 31 July 2021.Retrieved6 September2020.
  25. ^MacDonagh, Oliver (1975)."The Politicization of Irish Catholic Bishops: 1800-1850".The Historical Journal.xviii (1): 37–53.doi:10.1017/S0018246X00008669.JSTOR2638467.S2CID159877081.Archivedfrom the original on 23 September 2021.Retrieved4 September2020.
  26. ^Clifford, Brendan (1997).Spotlights on Irish History.Millstreet, Co. Cork: Aubane Historical Society. p. 95.ISBN0952108151.
  27. ^Macken, Ultan (2008).The Story of Daniel O'Connell.Cork: Mercier Press. p. 120.ISBN9781856355964.
  28. ^Mulvey, Helen (2003).Thomas Davis and Ireland: A Biographical Study.Washington DC: The Catholic University of America Press. p. 180.ISBN0813213037.Archivedfrom the original on 24 June 2021.Retrieved3 September2020.
  29. ^O'Connell to Cullen, 9 May 1842. Maurice O'Connell (ed.)The Correspondence of Daniel O'Connell.Shannon: Irish University Press, 8 vols.), vol. vii, p. 158
  30. ^Griffith, Arthur (1916).Meagher of the Sword:Speeches of Thomas Francis Meagher in Ireland 1846–1848.Dublin: M. H. Gill & Son, Ltd. p. vii
  31. ^O'Sullivan, T. F. (1945).Young Ireland.The Kerryman Ltd. p. 195
  32. ^Woodham-Smith, Cecil (1962).The Great Hunger: Ireland 1845–1849.London: Penguin. pp. 410–411.ISBN978-0-14-014515-1.
  33. ^Geoghegan, Patrick (2010).Liberator Daniel O'Connell: The Life and Death of Daniel O'Connell, 1830-1847.Dublin: Gill & Macmillan. p. 332.ISBN9780717151578.Archivedfrom the original on 22 September 2021.Retrieved3 September2020.
  34. ^LaRocca p. 58
  35. ^Finton Lalor to Duffy, January 1847 (Gavan Duffy Papers).
  36. ^Finton Lalor to Duffy, February 1847 (Gavan Duffy Papers).
  37. ^abT. F. O’Sullivan, The Young Irelanders, The Kerryman Ltd. 1945.
  38. ^McCullagh, John (8 November 2010)."Irish Confederation formed".newryjournal.co.uk/.Newry Journal.Archivedfrom the original on 25 September 2020.Retrieved27 August2020.
  39. ^O'Sullivan, T. F. (1945).Young Ireland.The Kerryman Ltd. pp. 195-6
  40. ^"Valentine Brown Lawless, Baron Cloncurry - Irish Biography".libraryireland.Archivedfrom the original on 5 June 2021.Retrieved5 March2021.
  41. ^Roger Courtney (2013),Dissenting Voices: Rediscovering the Irish Progressive Presbyterian Tradition,Ulster Historical Foundation, Belfast, p. 156
  42. ^abMichael Doheny’s The Felon’s Track, M.H. Gill & Son, LTD, 1951 Edition pg 111–112
  43. ^Terence LaRocca (1974) "The Irish Career of Charles Gavan Duffy 1840-1855", Doctoral Dissertation, Loyola University Chicago, pp. 52-55. Loyola eCommons[permanent dead link]
  44. ^Duffy, Charles Gavan (1898).My life in two hemispheres, Volume 1.London: Fischer Unwin. pp. 198–203.Archivedfrom the original on 23 September 2021.Retrieved1 September2020.
  45. ^Gray, Peter. (2012). "British Relief Measures".Atlas of the Great Irish Famine.Ed. John Crowley, William J. Smyth, and Mike Murphy. New York: New York University Press.
  46. ^Jenkins, Lee (Autumn 1999)."Beyond the Pale: Frederick Douglass in Cork"(PDF).The Irish Review(24): 92.Archived(PDF)from the original on 17 February 2018.Retrieved3 September2020.
  47. ^"Daniel O'Connell and the campaign against slavery".historyireland.History Ireland. 5 March 2013.Archivedfrom the original on 8 September 2020.Retrieved23 August2020.
  48. ^Bew, Paul; Maune, Patrick (July 2020)."The Great Advocate".Dublin Review of Books(124).Archivedfrom the original on 4 August 2020.Retrieved7 August2020.
  49. ^Kinealy, Christine (August 2011)."The Irish Abolitionist: Daniel O'Connell".irishamerica.Irish America.Archivedfrom the original on 14 August 2020.Retrieved24 August2020.
  50. ^Duffy, Charles Gavan (1883).Four Years of Irish History, 1845-1849.Dublin: Cassell, Petter, Galpin. pp. 500–501.Archivedfrom the original on 9 June 2021.Retrieved4 September2020.
  51. ^Gleeson, David (2016) Failing to 'unite with the abolitionists': the Irish Nationalist Press and U.S. emancipation.Slavery & Abolition,37 (3). pp. 622-637. ISSN 0144-039X
  52. ^Fanning, Bryan (1 November 2017)."Slaves to a Myth".Irish Review of Books(article).102.Retrieved11 November2018.
  53. ^William Theobald Wolfe Tone, ed. (1826).Life of Theobald Wolfe Tone, vol. 2.Washington D.C.: Gales and Seaton. p. 45.ISBN9781108081948.Archivedfrom the original on 23 September 2021.Retrieved3 September2020.
  54. ^Mitchel, John (1854).JAIL JOURNAL; OR, FIVE YEARS IN BRITISH PRISONS.New York: PUBLISHED AT THE OFFICE OF THE "CITIZEN,". p. Title page.COMMENCED ON BOARD THE SHEARWATER STEAMER, IN DUBLIN BAY, CONTINUED AT SPIKE ISLAND—ON BOARD THE SCOURGE WAR STEAMER—ON BOARD THE "DROMEDARY" HULK, BERMUDA-ON BQARD THE NEPTUNE CONVICT SHIP—AT PERNAMBUCO—AT THE CAPE OF GOOD HOPE (DURING THE ANTI-CONVICT REBELLION)—AT VAN DIEMAN'S LAND—AT SYDNEY—AT TAHITI—AT SAN FRANCISCO—AT GREYTOWN—AND CONCLUDED AT NO. 8 PIER, NORTH RIVER, NEW YORK
  55. ^"John Mitchel 1815-1875 Revolutionary".irelandseye.Archivedfrom the original on 9 November 2020.Retrieved19 August2019.
  56. ^"United Irishman (Dublin, Ireland: 1848) v. 1 no. 16".digital.library.villanova.eduUnited Irishman (Dublin, Ireland: 1848) v. 1 no. 16.Archivedfrom the original on 20 September 2020.Retrieved20 August2019.
  57. ^"Terence LaRocca (1974)" The Irish Career of Charles Gavan Duffy 1840-1855 ", Doctoral Dissertation, Loyola University Chicago, p. 3. Loyola eCommons"(PDF).Archivedfrom the original on 23 September 2021.Retrieved3 September2020.
  58. ^Duffy, Charles Gavan (1898).My life in two hemispheres, Volume 1.London: Fischer Unwin. p. 16.Archivedfrom the original on 23 September 2021.Retrieved1 September2020.
  59. ^Buckley, Mary (1976)."John Mitchel, Ulster and Irish Nationality (1842-1848)".Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review.65(257): (30–44) 37.ISSN0039-3495.JSTOR30089986.
  60. ^LaRocca, p. 63
  61. ^LaRocca pp.61-65
  62. ^Duffy, Charles Gavan (1848).The Creed of "The Nation": A Profession of Confederate Principles.Dublin: Mason Bookseller. p. 6.Archivedfrom the original on 23 September 2021.Retrieved3 September2020.
  63. ^Duffy, Charles Gavan (1848).The Creed of "The Nation": A Profession of Confederate Principles.Dublin: Mason Bookseller. p. 9.Archivedfrom the original on 23 September 2021.Retrieved3 September2020.
  64. ^La Rocca, p. 87
  65. ^John Huntly McCarthy (1887),Ireland since the Union,London, Chatto & Windus. p.121
  66. ^La Rocca, p. 78-80
  67. ^Navickas, Katrina (2016).Protest and the politics of space and place, 1789–1848.Manchester: Manchester University Press.ISBN978-1-78499-627-7.Archivedfrom the original on 23 September 2021.Retrieved19 April2021.
  68. ^Sir Charles Gavan Duffy,Four Years of Irish History 1845–1849,Cassell, Petter, Galpin & Co. 1888, p. 389
  69. ^Duffy, Charles Gavan (1883).Four Years of Irish History, 1845-1849.Dublin: Cassell, Petter, Galpin. pp. 640–645.Archivedfrom the original on 9 June 2021.Retrieved4 September2020.
  70. ^Grogan, Dick (29 July 1998)."Taoiseach to announce purchase of 1848 'Warhouse' in Tipperary".The Irish Times.Archivedfrom the original on 23 September 2021.Retrieved6 September2020.
  71. ^Duffy, Charles Gavan (1883).Four Years of Irish History, 1845-1849.Dublin: Cassell, Petter, Galpin. pp. 743–745.Archivedfrom the original on 9 June 2021.Retrieved4 September2020.
  72. ^Devoy, John (1929).Recollections of an Irish rebel.... A personal narrative by John Devoy.New York: Chas. P. Young Co., printers. p. 290.Retrieved13 October2020.
  73. ^Connolly, James (1910).Labour in Irish History.p. 168.
  74. ^Foster, R. F. (1988).Modern Ireland 1600-1972.Allen Lane, Penguin. p. 381.ISBN0713990104.
  75. ^Foster, R. F. (1988).Modern Ireland 1600-1972.Allen Lane, Penguin. p. 381.ISBN0713990104.
  76. ^Beckett, J.C. (1966).the Making of Modern Ireland, 1603-1923.London: Faber. p. 348.ISBN0571092675.
  77. ^Lyons, Dr Jane (1 March 2013)."Sir Charles Gavan Duffy, My Life in Two Hemispheres, Vol. II".From-Ireland.net.Archivedfrom the original on 28 February 2021.Retrieved27 March2021.
  78. ^Lyons, Jane (March 2013)."Irish Alliance and the Tenant Right League".From-Ireland.net.Archivedfrom the original on 28 September 2020.Retrieved6 September2020.
  79. ^Davitt, Michael (1904).The fall of feudalism in Ireland; or, The story of the land league revolution.London: Dalcassian Publishing Company. p. 70.Archivedfrom the original on 23 September 2021.Retrieved21 September2020.
  80. ^Duffy, Charles Gavan (1886).The League of North and South.London: Chapman & Hall.
  81. ^Duffy, Charles Gavan (1886).The League of North and South: An Episode in Irish History, 1850-1854.London: Chapman and Hall.
  82. ^Bew, Paul (2007).Ireland: The Politics of Enmity 1789-2006.Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 238–239.ISBN9780198205555.Archivedfrom the original on 2 April 2021.Retrieved3 September2020.
  83. ^Anton, Brigitte; O'Brien, R. B. (2008)."Duffy, Sir Charles Gavan".Oxford Dictionary of National Biography(online ed.). Oxford University Press.doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/32921.ISBN978-0-19-861412-8.(Subscription orUK public library membershiprequired.)
  84. ^McCaffrey, Lawrence (1976).The Irish Catholic Diaspora in America.Washington DC: The Catholic University of America Press. p. 145.ISBN9780813208961.Archivedfrom the original on 2 April 2021.Retrieved3 September2020.
  85. ^Bew, Paul (2007).Ireland: The Politics of Enmity 1789-2006.Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 238–239.ISBN9780198205555.Archivedfrom the original on 2 April 2021.Retrieved3 September2020.
  86. ^WikisourceThis article incorporates text from a publication now in thepublic domain:O'Brien, Richard Barry (1912). "Duffy, Charles Gavan".InLee, Sidney(ed.).Dictionary of National Biography(2nd supplement).London: Smith, Elder & Co.
  87. ^Senior, Hereward (1991).The Last Invasion of Canada: The Fenian Raids, 1866-1870.Dundurn.ISBN9781550020854.Archivedfrom the original on 21 July 2020.Retrieved26 June2020.
  88. ^Bardon, Jonathan (2008).A History of Ireland in 250 Episodes.Dublin: Gill & Macmillan. p. 389.ISBN9780717146499.

Bibliography[edit]

  • Bew, Paul(2007).Ireland: The Politics of Enmity 1789-2006.Oxford:Oxford University Press.ISBN9780198205555.
  • James Quinn.Young Ireland and The Writing of Irish History(2015).
  • Bryan McGovern, "Young Ireland and Southern Nationalism,"Irish Studies South(2016): Iss. 2, Article 5.onlineArchived8 November 2017 at theWayback Machine
  • Richard DavisThe Young Ireland Movement(Dublin, 1987).
  • Malcolm Brown,The Politics of Irish Literature: from Thomas Davis to W.B. Yeats,Allen & Unwin, 1973.Archived7 April 2007 at theWayback Machine
  • Aidan Hegarty,John Mitchel, A Cause Too Many,Camlane Press.
  • Arthur Griffith,Thomas Davis, The Thinker and Teacher,M.H. Gill & Son, 1922.
  • Young Ireland and 1848, Dennis Gwynn, Cork University Press, 1949.
  • Daniel O'Connell The Irish Liberator, Dennis Gwynn, Hutchinson & Co, Ltd.
  • O'Connell Davis and the Colleges Bill, Dennis Gwynn, Cork University Press, 1948.
  • Smith O’Brien And The "Secession", Dennis Gwynn, Cork University Press
  • Meagher of The Sword, Edited By Arthur Griffith, M. H. Gill & Son, Ltd., 1916.
  • Young Irelander Abroad: The Diary of Charles Hart,Ed. Brendan O'Cathaoir, University Press.
  • John Mitchel: First Felon for Ireland,Ed. Brian O'Higgins, Brian O'Higgins 1947.
  • Rossa's Recollections: 1838 to 1898, The Lyons Press, 2004.
  • James Connolly,The Re-Conquest of Ireland,Fleet Street, 1915.
  • Louis J. Walsh,John Mitchel: Noted Irish Lives,The Talbot Press Ltd, 1934.
  • Life of John Mitchel, P. A. Sillard, James Duffy and Co., Ltd 1908.
  • John Mitchel, P. S. O'Hegarty, Maunsel & Company, Ltd 1917.
  • R. V. Comerford,The Fenians in Context: Irish Politics & Society 1848–82,Wolfhound Press, 1998
  • Seamus MacCall,Irish Mitchel,Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd, 1938.
  • T. A. Jackson,Ireland Her Own,Lawrence & Wishart, Ltd, 1976.
  • T. C. Luby,Life and Times of Daniel O'Connell,Cameron & Ferguson.
  • T. F. O'Sullivan,Young Ireland,The Kerryman Ltd., 1945.
  • Terry Golway,Irish Rebel John Devoy and America's Fight for Irish Freedom,St. Martin's Griffin, 1998.
  • Thomas Gallagher,Paddy's Lament: Ireland 1846–1847 Prelude to Hatred,Poolbeg, 1994.
  • James Fintan Lalor, Thomas, P. O'Neill, Golden Publications, 2003.
  • Charles Gavan Duffy: Conversations With Carlyle (1892), with Introduction, Stray Thoughts on Young Ireland, by Brendan Clifford, Athol Books, Belfast,ISBN0-85034-114-0.
  • Brendan Clifford and Julianne Herlihy,Envoi, Taking Leave of Roy Foster,Cork: Aubane Historical Society
  • Robert Sloan,William Smith O'Brien and the Young Ireland Rebellion of 1848,Four Courts Press, 2000
  • An Gorta Mor), M. W. Savage,The Falcon Family, or, Young Ireland,London: 1845, Quinnipiac University

External links[edit]

Wikimedia Commons has media related toYoung Ireland.
Wikisourcehas the text of the 1905New International Encyclopediaarticle "Young Ireland".
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Young_Ireland&oldid=1183339840"