Neoconservatism

From Wikiquote
(Redirected fromNeocons)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Neoconservatismis a term referring to the political goals and ideology of the "new conservatives" in the United States.

Quotes

[edit]
  • [N]eoconservatism at its root is basically just saying what’s good is good for everybody. Not everybody all the time, and not everybody at the exact right level to absorb these ideas but freedom is not something that's limited.
  • What the heck is aneoconanyway in 2003? A friend of mine suggests it means the kind ofright-wingeraliberalwouldn't beembarrassedto have over for cocktails. That's as good a definition as any, since the term has clearly come unmoored from its original meaning.... In social policy, it stands for a broad sympathy with atraditionalistagenda and a rejection of extremelibertarianism.Neocons have led the charge to combat some of the wilder excesses ofacademiaand thearts.But there is hardly anorthodoxylaid down by Neocon Central. I, for one, am not eager to ban eitherabortionorcloning,two hot-button issues on thereligious right.On economic matters, neocons--like pretty much all otherRepublicans,except forMr. Buchananand his five followers--embrace alaissez-faireline, though they are not as troubled by the size of thewelfare stateaslibertariansare.
  • There's no "neo" in my conservatism.
  • Inside the administration are Vice President Dick Cheney and Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz. Their agenda is known as "neoconservatism," though a more accurate term might be "hardWilsonianism."Advocates of this view embraceWoodrow Wilson's championing of American ideals but reject his reliance on international organizations and treaties to accomplish our objectives.
  • The Americans occupyingIraqcouldn’t even admit to themselves they werecolonialists.Instead, theState Departmentdressed up the whole operation like it was a kind of armedsensitivity trainingseminar, designed to liberate Iraqi women from their traditionalgender roles:“Now that we’ve overthrownSaddam,we march ahead to overthrow thepatriarchy!”The result was failure, accompanied by chaos on every level. Watching it, I realized that there was nothing conservative about neoconservatism. The neocons were justliberalswith guns, the most destructive kind. The upside of the trip was that I made a lifelong friend. To this day I’m close to Kelly McCann, the retiredMarineofficer who guided me in Iraq. He’s still one of the most impressive people I know.
    • Tucker Carlson,The Long Slide: Thirty Years in American Journalism(2021)
  • You know, I have repeatedly defendedPresident Bushagainst theleftonIraq,even though I think he should have waited until theU.N.inspections were over. I don't believe he went in there foroil.We didn't go in there forimperialistor financial reasons. We went in there because he bought the Wolfowitz-Cheney analysis that the Iraqis would be better off, we could shake up theauthoritarianArabregimes in theMiddle East,and our leverage to make peace between thePalestiniansandIsraeliswould be increased.
  • If you are against war, you must act today. If the US reimposes the draft, you may be called to serve and to kill. And if the thought of killing to satisfy neocon blood thirst, government control of oil and oil pipelines, or US global hegemony offends your conscious, you must begin preparations to defend your soul.
    • Jim Fedako,Why Kill for Biden?,Mises Institute,21 March 2022
  • That war in the early 1990schanged a lot for me. I never thought I would see, inEurope,a full-dress reprise ofinternment camps,themass murderof civilians, the reinstitution oftortureandrapeas acts of policy. And I didn't expect so many of my comrades to be indifferent – or even take the side of thefascists.It was a time when many people on the left were saying 'Don't intervene, we'll only make things worse' or, 'Don't intervene, it might destabilise the region. And I thought – destabilisation of fascist regimes is a good thing. Why should theleftcare about the stability of undemocratic regimes? Wasn't it a good thing to destabilise the regime ofGeneral Franco?It was a time when the left was mostly taking theconservative,status quo position – leave theBalkansalone, leaveMilosevicalone, do nothing. And that kind of conservatism can easily mutate into actual support for the aggressors.Weimar-style conservatism can easily mutate intoNational Socialism.So you had people likeNoam Chomsky's co-authorEd Hermango from saying 'Do nothing in the Balkans', to actually supporting Milosevic, the most reactionary force in the region. That's when I began to first find myself on the same side as the neocons. I was signing petitions in favour of action in Bosnia, and I would look down the list of names and I kept finding, there's Richard Perle. There's Paul Wolfowitz. That seemed interesting to me. These people were saying that we had to act. Before, I had avoided them like the plague, especially because of what they said aboutGeneral Sharonand aboutNicaragua.But nobody could say they were interested in oil in the Balkans, or in strategic needs, and the people who tried to say that – likeChomsky– looked ridiculous. So now I was interested.
  • Whenprogressivesremain silent and don’t talk about why thewar in Syriais illegal, then into the void step in neocons likeLindsey Graham.Any wonder that our nation remains mired in endless war. Let’s have the guts to stand for responsible withdrawal.
  • [I]n America today, responsible liberals—who are usually called neoconservatives—see thatliberalismdepends on human beings who are somewhat child-centered,patriotic,andreligious.These responsible liberals praise these non-individualistic human propensities in an effort to shore up liberalism. One of their slogans is 'conservativesociologywith liberalpolitics.' The neoconservatives recognize that the politics of free and rational individuals depends upon a pre-political social world that is far from free and rational as a whole.
  • Analogies from history must, of course, be treated with care. Using the wrong one not only can present an oversimplified picture of a complex situation in the present but can lead to wrong decisions. After September 11, 2001, it became fashionable, especially among neo- Conservatives, to talk about how the West finds itself engaged in World War IV.Norman Podhoretz,a leading neo-con thinker, argued that theCold Warwas reallyWorld War IIIand that now, after a too-brief period of peace in the 1990s, we are engaged in an equally massive and deadly struggle againstIslamic fundamentalism.Like the other world wars, theUnited Statesand its allies are the innocent party; others have thrust war upon them. The West is only defending itself, even in wars like the Iraq one where it launched the attack. In such a view, the war is a moral one, of good against bad. A convenient shorthand, the authorship of which is proudly claimed by theCanadianDavid Frum,is the “Axis of Evil.” No matter that the Axis inWorld War IIwas a working set of alliances between Germany, Italy, and Japan and that this one is said to includeIraqandIran,countries that wageda long war against each otherin the1980s,andNorth Korea,whose leaders probably have trouble finding their two reputed partners on the map. No matter, too, that the Cold War was not like the greatmilitarystruggles of the two world wars and did not end with an armistice on the battlefields but with the collapse of one of the protagonists. Those who criticize the open-ended and ill-defined nature of the “war on terror”or the occupation of Iraq are dismissed asisolationists,cowards,or worse. Reviewing Podhoretz’s recent work,World War IV: The Long Struggle against Islamofascism,Ian Burumawrote: “The book expresses a weird longing for the state ofwar,for the clarity it brings, and for the chance to divide one’s fellow citizens, or indeed the whole world, neatly into friends and foes, comrades and traitors, warriors and appeasers, those who are with us and those who are against.”
  • Before the Iraq war I was quite disturbed by some of the neoconservatives, who were saying things like, "What is the point of being a superpower if you can't do such-and-such, take on these responsibilities?" The point of being a superpower is that people will leave you alone.
  • Why is it theMongolsof this world always tell us they're defending us against the Mongols?

See also

[edit]
[edit]
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
Wikipediahas an article about: