Jump to content

Terrorism

From Wikiquote
(Redirected fromTerrorist)
The rebellion of the exploited is never terrorism. ~Alfredo M. Bonanno
At length, after a terrible struggle, the (Directory) Troops prevailed over the Citizens (…) To secure them further, they have a strong corps of irregulars, ready armed. Thousands of those Hell-hounds called Terrorists, whom they had shut up in Prison on their lastRevolution,as the Satellites of Tyranny, are let loose on the people. ~Edmund Burke
Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve. ~George W. Bush
The United States doesn't have the will to defeat the terrorists. It has the will to control them and to use them as "the cards", as they did in Afghanistan. ~Bashar al-Assad
No-one becomes a terrorist from a standing start. It starts with a process of radicalisation. When you look in detail at the backgrounds of those convicted of terrorist offences, it is clear that many of them were first influenced by what some would call non-violent extremists.
-David Cameron
We know from long experience inIraqandAfghanistanto take territory, hold territory, and govern territory and prevent a reemergence of a terrorist group. ~Ash Carter
If fine speech-making, appeals to reason, or pleas for compassion had the power to move them, the terrorists would long ago have abandoned the field. ~Dick Cheney
Terror consists mostly of useless cruelties perpetrated by frightened people in order to reassure themselves. ~Friedrich Engels
Terrorism does its damage not mainly through body counts but by undermining the social trust that keeps communities engaged, united, and optimistic. ~Adam Garfinkle
There is always a point at which the terrorist ceases to manipulate themediagestalt. A point at which theviolencemay well escalate, but beyond which the terrorist has become symptomatic of the media gestalt itself. Terrorism as we ordinarily understand it is innately media-related. ~William Gibson
You get used to terrorist attacks... because you get used to everything. No human force, not even fear, is stronger than habit. ~Michel Houellebecq
Terrorism feeds offlies,conspiracies,disinformation,andhatred.Indian leaderMahatma Gandhiurged individuals to practice what he called “satyagraha,”ortruthforce.“Satyagraha is a weapon of the strong; it admits of no violence under any circumstance whatever; and it always insists upon truth,” he explained. That advice is just as important as it has ever been in theUnited States.~ Seth Jones, Catrina Doxsee
We cannot lose to terrorism, we must not yield to brute force. ~Junichirō Koizumi
Grievancesalways exist, but at certain times and in certain places major grievances have been borne withoutprotest,whereas elsewhere and at other times relatively minor grievances have resulted inviolentreaction. Nor is thechoiceof terrorism as aweaponaltogetherobvious,for frequently there are other ways ofresistance,bothpoliticalandmilitary.~ Walter Laqueur
AQuartzanalysis of the database shows that almost two-thirds of terror attacks in the (United States) last year were tied toracist,anti-Muslim,homophobic,anti-Semitic,fascist,anti-government,orxenophobicmotivations,” its posting says.
The remaining attacks, the web site said, “were driven byleft-wingideologies…andIslamic extremism.”~ Bill Morlin
No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his accomplices. ~Edward R. Murrow
The root cause of terrorism lies not in grievances but in a disposition toward unbridled violence. This can be traced to a world view which asserts that certain ideological and religious goals justify, indeed demand, the shedding of all moral inhibitions. ~Benjamin Netanyahu
Nepali Poet
Every morning I wake up with the news of bloodshed.
I feel my body, desperate to know whether I’m still alive.
-Suman Pokhrel
The impact of terrorism goes far beyond the body count. Violence motivated by racial, ethnic or religious animus fractures society along its most fragile fault lines, and sends shock waves through entire targeted communities. More hatred and fear, particularly of diversity, are often the response. ~ Mark Potok
Governments are terrorists, but they hide their actions behind the label of nationalism and patriotism: war becomes defense; theft becomes 'taxation'; slavery becomes 'conscription'; terrorism becomes 'defense.' Few people question the violations; rather, if they do protest, it is because the government is oppressing the 'wrong' group of people, and not because they regard coercion itself as wrong. ~L.K. Samuels
History has shown us that strength may be useless when faced with terrorism. ~Melinda M. Snodgrass
Amir Taheri (cropped)
Terrorists may end up like the man who, having won a great many tokens at the roulette table, is surprised when the casino tells him his winnings cannot be cashed.
-Amir Taheri
Terrorism is the war of the poor, and war is the terrorism of the rich. ~Peter Ustinov
Terrorism must be outlawed by all civilized nations — not explained or rationalized, but fought and eradicated. Nothing can, nothing will justify the murder of innocent people and helpless children.~Elie Wiesel
Terrorism is a crime. -Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono
We must address the root causes of terrorism to end it for all time. […] I believe putting resources into improving the lives of poor people is a better strategy than spending it on guns. ~Muhammad Yunus

Terrorismis an act designed to terrorize. In its most common usage, it usually refers to a violent act committed by private individuals against civilian targets in order to influence or bring about a certain outcome, usually political in nature.

Arranged alphabetically by author or source:
A·B·C·D·E·F·G·H·I·J·K·L·M·N·O·P·Q·R·S·T·U·V·W·X·Y·Z·See also·External links

A

[edit]
  • In recent years, theFBIobserved a decline in its ability to access to the content of both domestic and international terroristcommunications,due to the widespread adoption of encryption forInternettraffic and the prevalence ofmobile messaging appsusingend-to-end encryptionas default. In many places, we have effectively “gone dark.”
    As a private citizen, I certainly appreciateencryption’s increase in the overallsafetyandsecurityof theInternetfor users. But in fulfilling the FBI’s duty to the American people to prevent acts of terrorism, encryption creates serious challenges. Accessing content of communications by, or data held by, known or suspected terrorists pursuant to judicially authorized, warranted legal process is getting more and more difficult.
    Iflaw enforcementloses the ability to detect criminal activity because communication between subjects—datain motion—or data held by subjects —data at rest—is encrypted in such a way making content inaccessible, even with a lawful order, our ability to protect the American people will be degraded. I believe there are solutions providers could deploy which would provide safety and security to those using the Internet while also contributing to the FBI’s ability to prevent and investigate terrorism and other criminal acts like child exploitation and cybercrimes.
  • Terrorism thrives on administrativeviolenceandinjustice;that is the only atmosphere in which it can thrive and grow. It sometimes follows the example of indiscriminate violence from above; it sometimes, though very rarely, sets it from below. But the power above which follows the example from below is on the way to committingsuicide.
    • Sri Aurobindo,July 24, 1909, quoted fromSri Aurobindo,., Nahar, S., Aurobindo,., & Institut de recherches évolutives (Paris).India's rebirth: A selection from Sri Aurobindo's writing, talks and speeches.Paris: Institut de Recherches Evolutives. 3rd Edition (2000).

B

[edit]
  • That is why despite its imperfections, theEuropean Unioncan be, and indeed is, a powerful inspiration for many around the world. Because the challenges faced from one region to the other may differ in scale but they do not differ in nature. We all share the sameplanet.Poverty,organised crime,terrorism,climate change:these are problems that do not respect national borders. We share the same aspirations and universal values: these are progressively taking root in a growing number of countries all over the world. We share “l’irréductible humain”,the irreducible uniqueness of the human being. Beyond our nation, beyond our continent, we are all part of one mankind.Jean Monnet,ends hisMemoirswith these words:“Les nations souveraines du passé ne sont plus le cadre où peuvent se résoudre les problèmes du présent. Et la communauté elle-même n’est qu’un étape vers les formes d’organisation du monde de demain.” ( “Thesovereignnations of the past can no longer solve the problems of the present. And the [European] Community itself is only a stage on the way to the organised world of the future.” )This federalist and cosmopolitan vision is one of the most important contributions that the European Union can bring to a global order in the making.
  • I know there are several countries - mostlydictatorshipswith highly repressive regimes - desperately trying to acquirechemical weapons,biological weaponsor, in particular,nuclear weaponscapability. Some of these countries are now a short time away from having a serviceable nuclear weapon. This activity is not diminishing. It is increasing. We all know that there are terrorist cells now operating in most major countries. Just as in the last two years, around 20 different nations have suffered serious terrorist outrages. Thousands have died in them. The purpose of terrorism lies not just in the violent act itself. It is in producing terror. It sets out to inflame, to divide, to produce consequences which they then use to justify further terror. Round the world it now poisons the chances of political progress: in theMiddle East;inKashmir;in Chechnya; inAfrica.Theremoval of the TalibaninAfghanistandealt it a blow. But it has not gone away. And these two threats have different motives and different origins but they share one basic common view: they detest thefreedom,democracyandtolerancethat are the hallmarks of our way of life. At the moment, I accept that association between them is loose. But it is hardening. And the possibility of the two coming together - of terrorist groups in possession of WMD, even of a so-called dirty radiological bomb is now, in my judgement, a real and present danger.
  • Terrorism is defined aspolitical violencein an asymmetrical conflict that is designed to induce terror and psychic fear (sometimes indiscriminate) through the violent victimization and destruction of noncombatant targets (sometimes iconic symbols). Such acts are meant to send a message from an illicit clandestine organization. The purpose of terrorism is to exploit the media in order to achieve maximum attainable publicity as an amplifying force multiplier in order to influence the targeted audience(s) in order to reach short- and midterm political goals and/or desired long-term end states.
    • Carsten Bockstette,(2008). "Jihadist Terrorist Use of Strategic Communication Management Techniques" (PDF). George C. Marshall Center Occasional Paper Series (20). ISSN 1863-6039. Retrieved January 1, 2009.
  • The rebellion of the exploited is never terrorism.
  • Insurershave always found it costly to ignore new exposures. Doing that in the case of terrorism, however, could literally bankrupt the industry. No one knows the probability of anuclear detonationin a major metropolis this year (or even multiple detonations, given that a terrorist organization able to construct onebombmight not stop there). Nor can anyone, with assurance, assess the probability in this year, or another, of deadly biological or chemical agents being introduced simultaneously (say, through ventilation systems) into multiple office buildings and manufacturing plants. An attack like that would produce astronomicalworkers' compensationclaims.
  • At length, after a terrible struggle, the (Directory) Troops prevailed over the Citizens (…) To secure them further, they have a strong corps of irregulars, ready armed. Thousands of those Hell-hounds called Terrorists, whom they had shut up inPrisonon their lastRevolution,as the Satellites ofTyranny,are let loose on the people.
    • Edmund Burke– To The Earl Fitzwilliam (Christmas, 1795.) In:Edmund Burke, Select Works of Edmund Burke,vol. 3 (Letters on a Regicide Peace) (1795).
  • I believe thatIslamis a greatreligionthat preachespeace.AndI believe people who murder the innocent to achieve political objectives aren’t religious people.
    • George W. Bush,Interview of the President by Al Arabiya, Oval Office, White House News, (October 4, 2007)
  • When people live infreedom,they do not willingly choose leaders who pursue campaigns of terror. When people have hope in the future, they will not cede their lives toviolenceandextremism.So around the world, America is promoting humanliberty,human rights,and humandignity.We are standing withdissidentsand youngdemocracies,providingAIDSmedicine to bring dying patients back to life, and sparingmothersandbabiesfrommalaria.And this great republic born alone in liberty is leading the world toward a new age when freedom belongs to all nations... Murdering the innocent to advance anideologyis wrong every time, everywhere. Freeing people fromoppressionanddespairis eternally right. This nation must continue to speak out forjusticeandtruth.We must always be willing to act in their defense and to advance the cause of peace.
  • Whileour nationis safer than it was seven years ago, the gravest threat to our people remains anotherterrorist attack.Our enemies are patient and determined to strike again. America did nothing to seek or deserve this conflict. But we have been given solemn responsibilities, and we must meet them. We must resist complacency. We must keep our resolve. And we must never let down our guard. At the same time, we must continue to engage the world with confidence and clear purpose. In the face of threats from abroad, it can be tempting to seek comfort by turning inward. But we must rejectisolationismand its companion,protectionism.Retreating behind our borders would only invite danger. In the21st century,securityandprosperityat home depend on the expansion of liberty abroad. If America does not lead the cause of freedom, that cause will not be led.
  • Maintain our moral clarity.I have often spoken to you about good and evil. This has made some uncomfortable. But good and evil are present in this world, and between the two there can be no compromise. Murdering the innocent to advance an ideology is wrong every time, everywhere. Freeing people from oppression and despair is eternally right. This nation must continue to speak out for justice and truth. We must always be willing to act in their defense and to advance the cause of peace.

  • When I was still a member of what is probably best termed the British Jihadi Network, a series of semi-autonomous British Muslim terrorist groups linked by a single ideology, I remember how we used to laugh in celebration whenever people on TV proclaimed that the sole cause for Islamic acts of terror like9/11,theMadrid bombingsand7/7was Western foreign policy.

    By blaming the government for our actions, those who pushed the 'Blair's bombs' line did our propaganda work for us. More important, they also helped to draw away any critical examination from the real engine of our violence: Islamic theology.

C

[edit]
  • No-one becomes a terrorist from a standing start. It starts with a process of radicalisation. When you look in detail at the backgrounds of those convicted of terrorist offences, it is clear that many of them were first influenced by what some would call non-violent extremists.
  • We need ourinternet companiesto go further in helping us identify potential terrorists online. Many of their commercial models are built around monitoring platforms for personal data, packaging it up and selling it on to third parties. And when it comes to doing what’s right for their business, they are happy to engineertechnologiesto track our likes and dislikes. But when it comes to doing what’s right in the fight against terrorism, we too often hear that it’s all too difficult.
  • We’ve got to show that if you say “yes I condemn terror – but theKuffarare inferior”, or “violence in London isn’t justified, but suicide bombs inIsraelare a different matter” – then you too are part of the problem. Unwittingly or not, and in a lot of cases it’s not unwittingly, you are providing succour to those who want to commit, or get others to commit to, violence.
  • If fine speech-making, appeals to reason, or pleas for compassion had the power to move them, the terrorists would long ago have abandoned the field.
  • A twenty-year war ofterrorismwas waged againstCuba.Cuba has probably been the target of more international terrorism than the rest of the world combined and, therefore, in theAmerican ideological systemit is regarded as the source of international terrorism, exactly asOrwellwould have predicted. And now there’s a war againstNicaragua.
    The impact of all of this has been absolutely horrendous. There’s vast starvation throughoutthe regionwhile crop lands are devoted to exports to theUnited States.There’sslave labor,crushingpoverty,torture,mass murder,every horror you can think of. InEl Salvadoralone, from October 1979 (a date to which I’ll return) until December 1981 — approximately two years — about 30,000 people were murdered and about 600,000refugeescreated. Those figures have about doubled since. Most of the murders were carried out by U.S.-backed military forces, including so-calleddeath squads.The efficiency of the massacre in El Salvador has recently increased with direct participation ofAmerican military forces.American planes based inHonduranandPanamaniansanctuaries, military aircraft, now coordinate bombing raids over El Salvador, which means that the Salvadoran air force can more effectively kill fleeing peasants and destroy villages, and, in fact, the kill rate has gone up corresponding to that.
  • Before there were any suicide bombers, it was also reported by the same sources thatSaddam Husseinwas giving $10,000 to the families of anyone who was killed by Israeli atrocities, and there were plenty of them. Well, should he've been doing that? So let's take the first month of thecurrent intifada.I'm just relying now on IDF sources. What they say is, that in the first few days of the intifada, the Israeli army fired a million bullets. One of the high military officers said 'that means one bullet for every child'. Within the first month of the intifada, they killed about 70 people. Using U.S. helicopters, and in factClintonshipped new helicopters to Israel as soon as they started using them against civilians. That's just the first month. And it goes on, no suicide bombers. At the time, it was reported that Saddam Hussein was giving $10,000 to every family. Well, is that supporting terror? It seems to me, sending helicopters to Israel when they're using them to attack apartment complexes, that's supporting terror.
  • I know that the — that Saudi individuals have certainly funded other related terrorist groups over time and also exported a lot ofWahhabiradicalismby kicking out or sending out imams and teachers to set up schools and mosques to preach that particularly harsh brand of Islam. So the Saudis have a lot that they can do to both stop and then to help.
  • Fifteen years ago, there was this country called theSoviet Unionthat had over 10,000 nuclear warheads pointed at us... they're not there anymore. That's a good thing. And when people talk about how the world is more dangerous now than it was because we had these terrorists running around, my reply is, you know, a terrorist is like a buzzingmosquito.About 15 years ago, there was a great, bigvampire bat;that's several orders of magnitude different from a mosquito. So the world is much safer — a lot safer than it was. It's not perfectly safe, but it's a heck of a lot safer than it was.
  • Others are engaging even in an War|eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set offearthquakes,volcanoesremotely through the use ofelectromagnetic waves.
    • William Cohen,U.S. Secretary of Defense, DoD news briefing, April 28, 1997[3].
    • discussing threats from other countries' scientific projects
  • In this tragic moment, when words seem so inadequate to express the shock people feel, the first thing that comes to mind is this:We are all Americans!We are allNew Yorkers,just as surely asJohn F. Kennedydeclared himself to be a Berliner in 1962 when he visitedBerlin.
  • "...the purpose of terrorism, not to kill, maim or destroy, but to terrorize, to frighten, to anger, to provoke irrational responses. Terrorism gains more from the responses than it gains from the actions themselves."

D

[edit]
  • By one measure at least, the world is getting lessdangerous.There were 10% fewer deaths from terrorism in 2015 than the year before, according to the latest Global Terrorism Index compiled by the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP). It was still the second deadliest year on record though, with 29,376 people killed in terrorist attacks.
    Despitenewscoverage which often seems to suggest that terrorism is an ever-present threat all around the world, the reality is that a small number of countries suffer disproportionately. On the basis of the IEP’s definition of terrorism –illegalviolenceby non-state actors designed tointimidateorcoerceothers, or in pursuit of apolitical,economic,religiousorsocialgoal – more than 72% of terrorist deaths last year occurred in just five countries, and although there were 274 known groups that carried out terrorist attacks, just four of them (Islamic State / ISIS,Boko Haram,theTalibanandAl Qaeda) were responsible for 74% of all deaths.

E

[edit]
  • Terror consists mostly of useless cruelties perpetrated by frightened people in order to reassure themselves.

F

[edit]
  • Many factors have contributed to the evolution of the terrorism threat on both the international and domestic fronts, such as:
    Lone offenders: Terrorist threats have evolved from large-groupconspiraciestoward lone-offender attacks. These individuals often radicalize online and mobilize to violence quickly. Without a clear group affiliation or guidance, lone offenders are challenging to identify, investigate, and disrupt. The FBI relies on partnerships and tips from the public to identify and thwart these attacks.
    The Internet andsocial media:International and domestic violentextremistshave developed an extensive presence on the Internet through messaging platforms and online images, videos, and publications. These facilitate the groups’ ability to radicalize and recruit individuals who are receptive to extremist messaging. Social media has also allowed both international and domestic terrorists to gain unprecedented, virtual access to people living in the United States in an effort to enable homeland attacks.
  • Terrorism is nearly alone in its power to amplify the actions of an individual to influence the behavior of millions.
    By creating a fear of future attacks, terrorism affects even those who do not experience the violence firsthand. That fear leads people to give security a higher priority, to seek authority figures who will impose order and to re-evaluate who in society might pose a threat.
    Researchers who seek to understand this effect have long looked to Israel. With its history of terrorism and its complex multiparty political system, the country is something of a laboratory for understanding the interplay of attacks and elections.
    Claude Berrebi of the RAND Corporation and Esteban F. Klor of Hebrew University found, in a 2008 study, that when an area suffered a terrorist attack in the three months before an election, voters in that area shifted toward right-wing parties by an average of 1.35 percentage points.
    The effect was messier in parts of the country that did not experience the attack. Areas where voters already leaned right tended to increase support for right-wing parties. But left-leaning areas reduced their support for right-wing parties.
    Even if those effects cancel out in the short term, in the long term they can deepen political polarization, making politics more extreme.
  • There is another, subtler way that terrorism can alter politics: by reshaping how people view themselves and the rest of society.
    Exposure to terrorism tends to increase support for extreme politics in a number of ways, according to a 2015 study led by Daphna Canetti-Nisim, a political psychologist at the University of Maryland.
    For one, it increases hostility towardminorities.While this effect is strongest when people associate that minority with the attack, it can play out in other ways. People who endure terrorism “feel threatened and vulnerable,” the study found.
    This “psychological distress” makes them ore likely to retreat to familiar in-groups and view outsiders as threats. This supportsMs. Le Pen’s narrative of a civilizational conflict along demographic lines.
    Terrorism can also increase “popular support for nondemocratic regulations and practices,” particularly those targeting minorities, the study finds. Ms. Le Pen has promised to impose restrictions on Muslims andimmigrantsthat critics have called undemocratic or evenauthoritarian.

G

[edit]
  • Terrorism has rattled us, starting with 9/11 but continuing through lesser forms of murder and mayhem ever since—the kind perpetrated by radical Muslims via internet indoctrination (for example,Ft. Hood,Boston Marathon,San Bernardino,Orlando) and the more nativist kind perhaps more so (for example,Columbine,Sandy Hook,Parkland,Dylann Roof,Stephen Paddock,and, just this past week,Cesar Sayocand Robert Bowers). Terrorism does its damage not mainly through body counts but by undermining the social trust that keepscommunitiesengaged, united, and optimistic. Thebureaucratizedparanoiawe have allowed to develop as a consequence hasn’t helped in the least— “If you see something, say something” spoken a hundred million times a day across the country by our now ubiquitous automatonic ghosts. By essentially reminding people of the real prospect of mass murder several times a day, it’s been on balance counterproductive as well as very expensive.
  • There's a very similar and at least equally important (though far less discussed) constituency deeply vested in the perpetuation of this fear. It's the sham industry... "terrorism experts," who have built their careers on fear-mongering... and can stay relevant only if that threat does.
    These "terrorism experts" form an incredibly incestuous, mutually admiring little clique in and around Washington. They're employed at think tanks, academic institutions, and media outlets. They can and do have mildly different political ideologies -- some are moreRepublican,some are moreDemocratic-- but, as usual for D.C. cliques, ostensible differences in political views are totally inconsequential when placed next to their common group identity and career interest: namely, sustaining the myth of the Grave Threat...
    in order to justify their fear-based careers, the relevance of their circle, and their alleged "expertise." Like all adolescent, insular cliques, they defend one another reflexively whenever a fellow member is attacked, closing ranks with astonishing speed and loyalty; they take substantive criticisms very personally as attacks on their "friends," because a criticism of the genre and any member in good standing of this fiefdom is a threat...

H

[edit]
  • Refusing to accept a life of submission, the suicide bomber turns life itself into a horrible weapon.
  • What do groups likeISISandal-Qaeda,and evenHamas,want? They want to impose their religious views on the rest of humanity. They want to stifle every freedom that decent and educated and secular people care about. This is not a trivial difference. And yet, judging from the level of condemnation that Israel now receives, you would think the difference ran the other way. This kind of confusion puts us all in danger. This is the great story of our time. For the rest of our lives, and the lives of our children, we are going to be confronted by people who don't want to live peacefully in a secular pluralistic world because they are desperate to get to paradise, and they are willing to destroy the very possibility of human happiness along the way. The truth is, we areallliving in Israel; it's just that some of us haven't realized it yet.
  • Usually, terrorists film their attacks for future information operations and social media use. They may have had terrorist videographers in specific locations for that purpose.
  • On one point, at least, everyone agrees: terrorism is a pejorative term. It is a word with intrinsically negative connotations that is generally applied to one's enemies and opponents, or to those with whom one disagrees and would otherwise prefer to ignore. 'What is called terrorism,' Brian Jenkins has written, 'thus seems to depend on one's point of view. Use of the term implies a moral judgment; and if one party can successfully attach the label terrorist to its opponent, then it has indirectly persuaded others to adopt its moral viewpoint.' Hence the decision to call someone or label some organization terrorist becomes almost unavoidably subjective, depending largely on whether one sympathizes with or opposes the person/group/cause concerned. If one identifies with the victim of the violence, for example, then the act is terrorism. If, however, one identifies with the perpetrator, the violent act is regarded in a more sympathetic, if not positive (or, at the worst, an ambivalent) light; and it is not terrorism.
    • Bruce Hoffman(1998). "Inside Terrorism". Columbia University Press. p. 32.ISBN 0-231-11468-0.Archived from the original on April 16, 2009. Retrieved January 11, 2010. Google cached copyCS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)

J

[edit]
  • Civilization is based on a clearly defined and widely accepted yet often unarticulatedhierarchy.Violencedone by those higher on the hierarchy to those lower is nearly always invisible, that is, unnoticed. When it is noticed, it is fully rationalized. Violence done by those lower on the hierarchy to those higher is unthinkable, and when it does occur is regarded with shock, horror, and the fetishization of the victims.

K

[edit]

L

[edit]
  • Questionsabout whatmotivatesthe terrorist have been asked for a long time and theanswershave varied enormously. This is hardly surprising, for terrorism has appeared in many different guises and has varied greatly incharacterfromageto age and fromcountryto country. Anyexplanationthat attempts to account for all of its many different manifestations is bound to be either exceedinglyvagueor altogetherwrong.It has been said that highlyidealisticand deeply motivatedyoungpeoplehave opted for terrorism when they faced unresolved grievances and when there was no other way of registeringprotestand effectingchange.Dostoyevskiand many others would hardly have agreed. It has also been said that terrorists arecriminals,moralimbeciles,mentally deranged people orsadists(or sado-masochists). Sweeping definitions of this kind are bound to provokeskepticism.Terrorist movements are usually youth movements of sorts, and to dwell upon the idealistic character of youth movements is only stressing the obvious: they are not out forpersonal gainand they always oppose thestatus quo.But political goals are not necessarily wholyaltruistic,idealismandinterestmay coincide. Nor are personalambitionsabsent; terrorists have also been driven byimpatienceand a kind ofmachismo(or, more recently, itsfemaleequivalent). Terrorism has occurred with increasing frequency insocietiesin whichpeacefulchange ispossible.Grievancesalways exist, but at certain times and in certain places major grievances have been borne withoutprotest,whereas elsewhere and at other times relatively minor grievances have resulted inviolentreaction. Nor is thechoiceof terrorism as aweaponaltogetherobvious,for frequently there are other ways ofresistance,bothpoliticalandmilitary.
  • Terrorism is as old as human civilization… and as new as this morning’s headlines. For some, it seems obvious that individuals and organizations have used terrorism for millennia, while others insist terrorism has only been around for decades. Both camps are right – up to a point. The weapons, methods, and goals of terrorists constantly change, but core features have remained since the earliest times.Clodius Pulcher,theRomanpatrician who used murderous gangs to intimidate his opponents; the dagger-wieldingSicariiofJudea,who hoped to provoke awar with the Romans;twelfth-centuryassassinswho killed and terrorized their Muslim rivals; medieval scholars who quoted scripture to justify killing rulers – all these are examples of terrorism, and all predate the advent of the word “terrorism” inrevolutionary France.Since the 1790s, terrorism has been used byItaliansecret societieshoping to establish aliberal democraticstate,Russianrevolutionarieseager to introducesocialism,andEuropeananarchistseager to abolish allgovernments.American workersintimidatedindustrialistswith terrorism, whileGermanfascistsused it to open the way to asemi-legal seizure of power.ZionistsandArabsalike have employed it inattempts to win themselves states in Palestine.Cultshave hoped to trigger theapocalypse,andenvironmentalextremistshave sought to save thewilderness.More recently,an Americanblew up a federal building in Oklahoma Cityout of disgust for his government. Andnineteen Arabsso loved death that they pilotedplanesinto American landmarks, killing three thousand people. All of these actors and events are unique, but every single one of them belongs to thehistory of terrorism.
    • Randall D. Law,Terrorism: A History(2016), p. 1
  • Another complicating factor is that people, misled by the word’s suffix, tend to mistake the core nature of terrorism. Terrorism is not an ideology and does not exist as a specific worldview, a system of thought, or a political program. In this regard, it is not comparable toliberalism,conservatism,capitalism,socialism,or any of the other myriad “isms” that populate our history books, despite terrorism’s existence as one of the defining phenomena of the modern era. Looked at another way, terrorists are always something else, be theycommunists,nationalists,orfascists(among other possibilities). Terrorism is a strategy that makes use of certain tactics; in other words, terrorism is a means to an end – although often one that eventually overshadows the positive goals which its users ostensibly strive. I begin with two core assertions well founded in the broad literature on the topic. The first is that individuals or groups choose to commit terrorist acts as part of a process of rational and conscious decision-making within particular political and social contexts. Thus, terrorism is not, as it is often colloquially described, a kind ofmadness– although individual terrorists have certainly been known to exhibit the various signs ofmental illness.My second basic assertion is that terrorism is a communicative act intended to influence the behavior of one or more audiences.
    • Randall D. Law,Terrorism: A History(2016), pp. 2-3
  • The difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter is a matter of perspective: it all depends on the observer and the verdict of history.
    • Pentti Linkola,Can Life Prevail?: A Revolutionary Approach to the Environmental Crisis.page 160
  • I know that you personally do not fear giving up your own life in order to take others; that is why you are so dangerous. But I know you fear that you may fail in your long-term objective to destroy our free society and I can show you why you will fail. In the days that follow, look at our airports, look at our sea ports and look at ourrailwaystations and, even after your cowardly attack, you will see... They come to be free, they come to live the life they choose, they come to be able to be themselves. They flee you because you tell them how they should live. They don't want that and nothing you do, however many of us you kill, will stop that flight to our city where freedom is strong and where people can live in harmony with one another. Whatever you do, however many you kill, you will fail.

M

[edit]
  • Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only a means, it is the end in itself… It is the point where the means and the end meet and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon the enemy. It is the decision we wish to impose upon him... Terror... can be instilled only if the opponent’s Faith is destroyed. Psychological dislocation is temporary; spiritual dislocation is permanent. Psychological dislocation can be produced by a physical act but this does not hold good of the spiritual dislocation. To instill terror into the hearts of the enemy, it is essential, in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate hisFaith...
    • Malik, Brigadier S.K., The Quranic Concept of War, Lahore, 1979, New Delhi reprint, 1986., quoted from S.R. Goel, The Calcutta Quran Petition Section 1, Chapter 3. (1999)
  • I define a 'terrorist' as a non-state actor who attacks civilian targets in order to strike terror into the hearts of the enemy community... A 'state terrorist' is a state doing the same thing.
    • Michael Mann,Professor of Sociology, UCLA inIncoherent Empire,p. 159.
  • No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his accomplices.
    • Edward R. Murrow,broadcaster, CBS television broadcast “See It Now” (7 March 1954)

N

[edit]
  • The root cause of terrorism lies not in grievances but in a disposition toward unbridled violence. This can be traced to a world view which asserts that certain ideological and religious goals justify, indeed demand, the shedding of all moral inhibitions.”
    • Benjamin Netanyahu,former Israeli ambassador and current Israeli prime minister.
    • As quoted in —Terrorism—How the West Can Win.Awakeǃmagazine, 1/8 - 1987.
  • It must be noted thatmen with bad instincts are more in number than the good, and therefore the best results in governing them are attained by violence and terrorization,and not by academic discussions.
  • This is the origin of the theory of course of arbitration. You may say that the goyim will rise upon us, arms in hand, if they guess what is going on before the time comes; butin the West we have against this a manoeuvre of such appalling terror that the very stoutest hearts quail -- the undergrounds, metropolitains, those subterranean corridors which, before the time comes, will be driven under all the capitals and from whence those capitals will be blown into the air with all their organizations and archives.
  • That the people may know and love their king it is indispensable for him to converse in the market-places with his people. This ensures the necessary clinching of the two forces which are now divided one from another by us by the terror.This terror was indispensable for us till the time come; for both these forces separately to fall under our influence.
    • Sergei Nilus,The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion(1934)
    • Machiavelli:A Prince whose power is founded upon a democratic base, must speak carefully, albeit popularly. If necessary he must not fear to speak like a demagogue, for after all he is the people, and he must have its passions...
    • Maurice Joly,The Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu,Twenty-fifth dialogue,(1864)

O

[edit]
  • The terrorists have won... What was their goal 15 long, sad years ago? To strip from the world's greatest power, their traditions of growing tolerance. To hamstring the international interests of a country that barely stuck to the international double-white line of the moral road, but came closer than any other. To take our energies from trying... to help the world move forward, and instead make us direct those energies inward, at one another, within our own borders.

P

[edit]
  • You know, the media and the politicians would have us believe that there's something inherently immoral about terrorism. That is, they would have us believe that it's not immoral for us to destroy a pharmaceutical factory inSudanwith cruise missiles, but it is immoral for someone like Bin Laden to blow up a government building inWashingtonwith a truck bomb. It's okay for us to take out an air-raid shelter full ofwomenandchildreninBaghdadwith a smart bomb, but it's cowardly and immoral for anIraqiorIranianagent to pop a vial ofsarinin aNew Yorksubway tunnel. Really, what should we expect? They don't haveaircraft carriersandcruise missilesandstealth bombers.So should we expect them to just sit there and take their punishment when we wage war on them? I think that it is the most reasonable thing in the world for them to hit back at us in the only way they can. It actually takes more courage to be a terrorist behind enemy lines than it does to push the firing button for a cruise missile a hundred miles away from your target. And yet we certainly will see Bill Clinton and every other Jew-serving politician in our government ontelevisiondenouncing as a "cowardly act" the first terrorist bomb which goes off in the United States as a result of awar against Iraq.And don't be surprised when the FBI and theCIAannounce that they have studied the evidence carefully and have determined that it was Iranian terrorists who built the bomb, so that theJewswill have an excuse for expanding the war to take out Iran as well as Iraq.
  • Every morning
    I wake up with the news
    of bloodshed.
    I feel my body,
    desperate to know whether
    I’m still alive.
  • Terrorism is a real and serious threat no matter what its ideological origin. And it is not only the immediate casualties who are victims — attacks on minorities for ideological reasons have the effect of terrorizing entire minority groups.
  • The impact of terrorism goes far beyond the body count. Violence motivated by racial, ethnic or religious animus fractures society along its most fragile fault lines, and sends shock waves through entire targeted communities. More hatred and fear, particularly of diversity, are often the response.

R

[edit]
  • Terrorists aren't trying to kill us because we offended them. They attack us because they want to impose their view of the world on as many people as they can, and America is standing in their way. We need to make it unmistakably clear that we will do whatever it takes, for however long it takes, to defeat radicalIslamic terrorism.We will punish — we will punish their allies, likeIran— and we will stand with our allies, like Israel.

S

[edit]
  • Governments are terrorists, but they hide their actions behind the label of nationalism andpatriotism:warbecomesdefense;theftbecomes 'taxation';slaverybecomes 'conscription'; terrorism becomes 'defense.' Few people question the violations; rather, if they do protest, it is because the government is oppressing the 'wrong' group of people, and not because they regard coercion itself as wrong.
    • L.K. Samuels,Facets of Liberty: A Libertarian Primer,edited L.K. Samuels, Freeland Press (2009), chapter 17: “Who’s Afraid of No Government” pp. 139-140.
  • Islamic terrorists are against us because of what we do, not who we are…if we did not attack them, then their leadership would have trouble persuading their followers that they need to die attacking the American way of life.
    • Michael Scheuer,ex head of CIA anti-terrorist unit on the ABC (Australian Broadcasting Commission) 7.30 report (23 November 2004).
  • The term "Single Issue Terrorism" is broadly accepted as extremist militancy on the part of groups or individuals protesting a perceived grievance or wrong usually attributed to governmental action or inaction. Generally, three principal issues are regarded to fall under that definition:animal rights,environmentalism,andabortion.
    • Smith, G. Davidson (1998)."Single Issue Terrorism Commentary".Canadian Security Intelligence Service.Archived from the original on 15 October 2007. Retrieved 1 September 2011.

T

[edit]
  • The terrorist kills because he cannot compete with his adversaries. Instead of responding toSalman Rushdie’sill-structured and unreadable novelwith anovelthat is well-plotted and properly written, the terrorist calls for his murder. The terrorist cannot challengeTheo van Gogh’s controversial documentary with a better one and thus decides to stab him to death. The history of contemporaryIslamist terrorismis full of instances of cold-blooded murder ordered by those who could not compete in literary, political, social or even theological fields against those better than them. With the advent ofglobalization,Islamist terrorism is now able to strike beyond the frontiers of theMuslim world.But the same lazy mentality is at work. The terrorist knows that he is incapable of building an alternative civilization capable of competing with the one he despises. So he tries to destroy what becomes the cause of his humiliation.
    • Amir Taheri,"Terrorism Cannot Win: This is Why",Elaph.com,(January 16, 2014).
  • We must try to find ways to starve the terrorist and the hijacker of theoxygenofpublicityon which they depend.
  • In our eyes, individual terror is inadmissible precisely because it belittles the role of the masses in their ownconsciousness,reconciles them to their own powerlessness, and turns their eyes and hopes toward a great avenger and liberator who someday will come and accomplish his mission.
    • Leon Trotsky:On Terrorismin the Pathfinder Press pamphlet "Marxism and Terrorism"; original inDer Kampf,November 1911, trans. M. Vogt and G. Saunders.

U

[edit]
  • Criminalacts intended or calculated to provoke a state of terror in the public, a group of persons or particular persons for political purposes are in any circumstance unjustifiable, whatever the considerations of a political, philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or any other nature that may be invoked to justify them.
    • 1994 United Nations Declaration on Measures to Eliminate International Terrorism annex to UN General Assembly resolution 49/60, "Measures to Eliminate International Terrorism", of December 9, 1994,UN Doc. A/Res/60/49.
  • Terrorism is the war of the poor, and war is the terrorism of the rich.
    • Peter Ustinov,Achtung! Vorurteile(2003)
    • Original German: "Der Terrorismus, der im furchtbaren 11. September kulminierte, ist ein Krieg der Armen gegen die Reichen. Der Krieg ist ein Terrorismus der Reichen gegen die Armen." typically cited in short: "Terrorismus ist der Krieg der Armen und der Krieg ist der Terrorismus der Reichen."

W

[edit]
  • Accusations of terrorism are usually very subjective. There seems to be no objective adjudicator on the subject of terrorism. In fact, in the post-9/11 United States the label has been thrown about with such carelessness in the media that the very word is in danger of losing significance. It is rapidly becoming the most commonly, carelessly, thoughtlessly and irresponsibly used word in theEnglish language.
    • Paul Watson,"ELF and ALF - Terrorism Is as Terrorism Does", taken fromTerrorists or Freedom Fighters? Reflections on the Liberation of Animals(2004), p. 279
  • All violence is justified by the perpetrators and their supporters, and condemned by those who disagree. In other words, allhumanssupport violence when they agree with the philosophy of the perpetrators and condemn violence when they disagree with that philosophy.
    • Paul Watson,"ELF and ALF - Terrorism Is as Terrorism Does", taken fromTerrorists or Freedom Fighters? Reflections on the Liberation of Animals(2004), p. 283
  • Terrorism must be outlawed by all civilized nations — not explained or rationalized, but fought and eradicated. Nothing can, nothing will justify the murder of innocent people and helpless children.
  • We must answer hatred and violence from terrorists with exclusion and intolerance and show who's the boss.
    • Geert Wilders,NRC Handelsblad(22 July 2005), as quoted inTradition and Future of Islamic Education(2009), by Wilna A.J. Meijer, p. 24

Y

[edit]
  • We must address the root causes of terrorism to end it for all time. […] I believe putting resources into improving the lives of poor people is a better strategy than spending it on guns.
  • I invite all of us to continue taking preventive measures so that acts of terror do recur in the future. If there are such acts, immediate action must be taken and the perpetrators must be brought to justice. We know terrorism is something that we don’t want in Indonesia.Terrorism is a crime. Noreligionallows it.

Z

[edit]
  • The next time you hear of a terror attack, no matter where it is, no matter what the circumstances, you will likely think to yourself, 'It's Muslims again.' And you will probably be right.

In fiction

[edit]
Huey Freeman:Why do you keep hanging up on me? I’m telling you the truth!
TheCIAtrainedOsama Bin Ladenin using terrorism against thesovietsduring theReagan-Bushadministration they gave theAfghanistanrebels countless amounts of covert funding! ~Aaron McGruder
Huey Freeman:Speakinghonestlyis not beinginsensitive.You think I’m notscaredlike everyone else? I’m scared to death!
I know those terrorists don’t care about myleftistphilosophies.I know they’ll kill me just as soon as they’ll kill anyone else matter of fact. Terrorist attacks are now my new number onefear!~Aaron McGruder
Lt Cmdr. Data:[W]ould it be accurate to say that terrorism isacceptable,when alloptionsforpeacefulsettlement have been foreclosed? ~Melinda M. Snodgrass
  • Huey squeals to the Feds’ terrorism hotline -
Huey:Why do you keep hanging up on me? I’m telling you the truth!
TheCIAtrainedOsama Bin Ladenin using terrorism against thesovietsduring theReagan-Bushadministration they gave theAfghanistanrebels countless amounts of covert funding!
FBI:Don’t you have better things to be doing?
Huey:Better than fighting terrorism? Heck no! We’re at war!!
  • Huey helps the FBI wage war on terrorism
Huey:Wait, before you hang up. I have one more important tip!
G.W. Bushgave theTalibangovernment $4.3 million this May!This May!! How much of thatmoneywill be spent onweaponrythat will be used againstU.S. soldiers?
FBI:Wow – I didn’t know that…
Huey:He lives at1600 Pennsylvania– hey, are you writing this down? And I suggest bringingreallytight handcuffs.
  • Huey:Speakinghonestlyis not beinginsensitive.You think I’m notscaredlike everyone else? I’m scared to death!
    I know those terrorists don’t care about myleftistphilosophies.I know they’ll kill me just as soon as they’ll kill anyone else matter of fact. Terrorist attacks are now my new number onefear!
Caesar:What was the old number one fear?
Huey:Vivica Foxbeating me up. She seems like the violent type.
  • FBI:FBI terrorism tip line.
Huey:It’s Huey again. Got another hot lead on a terrorist.
FBI:Lord…Huey, we don’t have time for this. I’m hanging up.
Huey:Wait! I got a good one this time!
FBI:(sigh).. (Uh-huh…
Huey:Kissinger, Henry,Formersecretary of stateunderNixon,allegedly responsible for the deaths of about 950,000 civilians inLaosandCambodiain the early1970s.
if you’re having trouble finding him, ask the guys who gave him theNobel peace prize.
Hello?
Capt.Jean-Luc Picard:Historyhas shown us that strength may be useless when faced with terrorism.
Capt.Jean-Luc Picard:By my programme as well, Data.
Lt Cmdr. Data:But if that is so, Captain, why are their methods so oftensuccessful?I've been reviewing thehistoryof armedrebellion,and it appears that terrorism is an effective way to promotepoliticalchange.
Capt. Jean-Luc Picard:Yes, it can be. But I have never subscribed to thetheorythatpolitical power flows from the barrel of a gun.
Lt Cmdr. Data:Yet there are numerous examples when it was successful:the independence of the Mexican state from Spain,the Irish Unification of 2024, and the Kenzie Rebellion.
Capt. Jean-Luc Picard:Yes, I am aware of them.
Lt Cmdr. Data:Then would it be accurate to say that terrorism isacceptable,when alloptionsforpeacefulsettlement have been foreclosed?
Capt. Jean-Luc Picard:Data, these arequestionsthatmankindhas beenstrugglingwith throughout history. Yourconfusionis… onlyHuman.
[edit]
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
Wikipediahas an article about:
Wiktionary
Wiktionary
Look upterrorisminWiktionary,the free dictionary
Retrieved from "https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism&oldid=3564500"