Dalit

Dalit(fromSanskrit:दलित, romanized:dalitameaning "broken/scattered" ), also known asuntouchable,is a name for people belonging to the lowest stratum castes inIndia.Dalits were excluded from the four-fold varna system of Hinduism and were seen as forming a fifth varna, also known by the name ofPanchama.Dalits now profess various religious beliefs, including Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Christianity, Islam and various other belief systems. Scheduled Castes is the official term for Dalits as per the Constitution of India.

Quotes

• [Dr. Ghurye’s anthropometric study of the different castes establishes] “that theBrahminand the Untouchable belong to the same race. From this it follows that if the Brahmins areAryans,the Untouchables are also Aryans. If the Brahmins areDravidians,the Untouchables are also Dravidians. If the Brahmins areNagas,the Untouchables are also Nagas.”
  • Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches, Volume 7 edited by Vasant Moon, Education Department, Govt. of Maharashtra Publications, Mumbai, 1990. Quoted in Talageri, S. (2000). The Rigveda: A historical analysis. New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan.

• Another illustration would be the attitude of theMuslimstowards the problem of the Untouchables. TheMuslimshave always been looking at the Depressed Classes with a sense of longing, and much of the jealousy betweenHindusand Muslims arises out of the fear of the latter that the former might become stronger by assimilating the Depressed Classes. In 1909 the Muslims took the bold step of suggesting that the Depressed Classes should not be enrolled in the census as Hindus.
  • B. R. Ambedkar,Pakistan or The Partition of India (1946)

• Let me just direct your attention once more upon these untouchables, fifty or sixty millions of them, that is to say more than the whole population of theBritish Isles;all living their lives in acceptance of the validity of the awfulcursepronounced upon them by theBrahmins.A multitude as big as anation,men,women andchildrendeprived of hope and of the status of humanity. Their plight is worse than that ofslaves,because they have been taught toconsentnot only to a physical but to a psychicservitudeand prostration. I have asked myself whether ifChristcame again into this world, it would not be to the untouchables of India that he would first go, to give them the tidings that not only are all men equal in the sight ofGod,but that for the weak and poor and downtrodden a double blessing is reserved.
  • Winston Churchill,"Our Duty in India,"18 March 1931

• It was well after the Vedic period, after even the period of the Mauryan empire, that the notion of untouchability came into being. In Satapatha Brahmana, the chief is advised to eat from the same vessel as the commoner. In the Rg Veda there is no mention of untouchable either. It was only around second century ad that the stratum of untouchables and the notion of untouchability became evident for instance in Apasthambha Dharmasutra.
  • Dipankar Gupta,quoted fromMalhotra, R.& Viswanathan V. (2022).Snakes in the Ganga: Breaking India 2.0.

• The term Dalit as a social category was introduced by the Hindu reform movementArya Samajin the late19th centuryin its campaign fordalitoddhara,“upliftment of the oppressed”. ItsEnglishcounterpart “depressed classes” was used by Dr.B. R. Ambedkaras a more precise alternative toMahatma Gandhi’s religious termHarijan,“people of God”, a term which has recently given way to Dalit or to the legal term scheduled Caste in ordinary usage.
  • Elst, Koenraad(1999).Update on the Aryan invasion debateNew Delhi: Aditya Prakashan.

• Given the Hindu-tribal continuity,Guru Golwalkarproposed that for the integration of tribals and untouchables, one and the same formula applies: 'They can be givenyajñopavîta(...) They should be givenequal rightsand footings in the matter ofreligious rights,in temple worship, in the study ofVedas,and in general, in all our social and religious affairs. This is the only right solution for all the problems ofcasteismfound nowadays in our Hindu society.'
  • M.S. Golwalkar:Bunch of Thoughts, p.479. Quoted from Elst, Koenraad (2002). Who is a Hindu?: Hindu revivalist views of Animism, Buddhism, Sikhism, and other offshoots of Hinduism.ISBN 978-8185990743

• "The first example of untouchability is seen after Islam came. It is seen when atRaja Dahir's household his queens were on the way to commit Johar. They mentioned the word 'Malechcha' and said they need to hurry for theJohar,else the 'Malechcha' would touch them and they will become impure. This is the first example of untouchability in Indian text. "
  • Krishna Gopal, 2019. As quoted in ANI[1].[2]

• Before the coming of the Aryans […] theTamilsbelieved that any taking of life was dangerous, as it released the spirits of the things that were killed. Likewise, all who dealt with the dead or with dead substances from the body were considered to be charged with the power ofdeathand were thought to be dangerous. Thus, long before the coming of the Aryans with their notion ofvarna,the Tamils had groups that were considered low and dangerous and with whom contact was closely regulated.
  • Hart (1983 117), Hart III, George L., 1983, ‘The Theory of Reincarnation among the Tamils’(dated 1980), in: Wendy Doniger (ed.), Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions, Indian reprint Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, pp.116 – 133. quoted from Elst, Koenraad. Manu as a weapon against egalitarianism: Nietzsche and Hindu political philosophy in: Siemens & Vasti Roodt, eds.: Nietzsche, Power and Politics (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin 2008).

• On a more personal note, I see many similarities between India's Dalit problems and theAfrican-Americanproblems that have rocked theUSsince its beginnings. For thisreason,I personally take Dr.Ambedkaras one of myheroes.
  • David Mumford."'All men are created equal'?,"atdam.brown.edu/people/mumford/blog,June 16, 2015.

• It is useless to talk of ademocracyas long as this kind ofprejudice(untouchability) sways our mind and influences our conduct towards those from whom we differ inreligionor whose forms of occupation we dislike.… The process of building a nation is a moral process. You cannot engage in work of this kind with success by practicingduplicity.…It is sufficiently humiliating that we should have to mention untouchability at all in our programme; but to have avoided it for fear of offending the sensibilities of some classes of our countrymen would have been even worse. It would have been immoral.
  • Lala Lajpat Raiquoted from What India Owes Lala Lajpat Rai by Aravindan Neelakandan[3]

• Reformers likeSwami Vivekananda,likeGandhiji,likeNarayan Guruhad had no difficulty in showing that Untouchability had no sanction in our scriptures, that, on the contrary, the conclusive doctrinal argument lay in the central proposition of the scriptures themselves: namely, that all wasBrahman,that the same soul inhered in all. There was also the historical fact that whatever might have been the excrescences which had grown around or in the name of Hinduism, the entire and long history of the religion showed that it was uniquely receptive to new ideas, that it was uniquely responsive to reformers, that it was adaptable as no other religion was, and therefore there was no reason to believe that it would not reform itself out of this evil also.
  • Arun Shourie: Worshipping False Gods, p.230.

• No one in thetwentieth centuryhas done as much to rid us of untouchability as Gandhiji. He attached more importance to ridding Hinduism of this accretion than to attaining swaraj. He brought upon himself the hostility of orthodox opinion all over India by his uncompromising stand on the matter. But the other day, speaking during the commemorative session ofParliament,Kanshi Ramasserted that abolishing untouchability was never on Gandhiji’s agenda. Not one person stood up to contradict him, not one stood up to point to the record of forty years of our country’s recent history.
  • Shourie, Arun(2014). Eminent historians: Their technology, their line, their fraud. Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India: HarperCollins Publishers.

• If God is put up with untouchability, I will not call him God.
  • BG Tilak. quoted inHunt, Frazier (1931).Great Personalities.New York Life Insurance Company. pp. 153–.

• In short, the avalanche ofTurco- Mughal invaders,and the policy of their Government turned many settled agriculturists into tribals of the jungles....For example, many Parihars and Parmars, once upon a time belonging to the proudRajputcastes, are now included in lower castes. So are the “Rajputs” counted in Backward Classes inSouth India.... in course of time many of these Jats and Khokhars were pushed into belonging to low castes of to-day. For the later times is the example of theSatnamis.This sect was an offshoot of theRaidasis.....At lastAurangzebcrushed them by sending 10,000 troops (March, 1672) and facing a most obstinate battle in which two thousand Satnamis fell on the field and many more were slain during the pursuit. Those who escaped spread out into small units so that today there are about 15 million Satnami Harijans....
  • K. S. Lal(1992). The legacy of Muslim rule in India. New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan.

• The practice of untouchability is asin,a blot onhumanity,and nothing can justify it. Consider only that untouchable which is injurious to one’s health, not fellow human beings. Unshackling this one foolish fetter would bring crores of our Hindu brethren into the mainstream. They would serve the country in various capacities and defend her honour.
  • V. D. Savarkar,quoted in Vikram Sampath - Savarkar, Echoes from a Forgotten Past, 1883–1924 (2019)

• When I invited a Dalit girl to place a Kumbh at my residence on the occasion of ‘Vijay Dashami’, it is not because someone asked me to do so. It is because I believe it is thecollective responsibilityof all of us to change this mindset. Thisdiseaseis so deep rooted in our society that the mindset of even those who are well-educated, smart, and converse inEnglishhas not really changed on this issue.
  • Narendra Modiquoted in Madhu Purnima Kishwar: Modi, Muslims and Media. Voices from Narendra Modi’s Gujarat, Manushi Publications, Delhi 2014.

• Abolition of untouchability should be enforced by a very ruthless law... to refuse to give treatment of equality to members of theScheduled Castesshould be declared by Parliament a cognizable offence. If they did so, then all the states would be bound by it. The police would then be authorized to take legal action against the offenders and bring them to book. Police protection should be given to members of the Scheduled Castes... the Scheduled Castes should abolish untouchability among themselves, as between Mahars and Mangs and others... the backward classes should be given assistance on the basis of their poverty and illiteracy.
  • V.D. Savarkar, quoted in Savarkar (Part 2): A Contested Legacy, 1924-1966. Vikram Sampath. Penguin Viking. 712 pages. Rs. 729 (Hard cover). As quoted from[4]