Given how obvious the block is in code, should we assume that it was intentional and update the docs?

Hi, any update on this issue?

There is a similar issue to this one aswell

Given a response defined in the api parameters

This code produces aError: response status is 502

@router.get("/test")
deftest(res:Response):
# res.status_code = 200
returnres

last error log

File"/usr/local/lib/ Python 3.12/site-packages/uvicorn/protocols/http/h11_impl.py",line 488,insend
reason = STATUS_PHRASES[status]

However if we change anything in the response

It works

@router.get("/test")
deftest(res:Response):
res.status_code=200
returnres

This is very weird because the default value of theResponse.status_codeis200anyway.
I was not able to understand how exactly can aResponsebe put in the endpoint parameter list withoutDependsas it will not be explicitly initialized.

The couple of errors presented by@Kludex& the one I reported above means maybe we need a big refactor on how Response class works? It has been over a year on this issue; I wonder why it has been up all this time ^^. Thank you

Hii,
is this issue is related to this part of code can you please guide me on this

responses:Annotated[
Optional[Dict[Union[int,str],Dict[str,Any]]],
Doc(
"""
Additional responses that could be returned by this *path operation*.

It will be added to the generated OpenAPI (e.g. visible at `/docs`).
"""
),
]=None,