Hak asasi hewan

Hak asasi hewan
Hak asasi hewan
	Advokat hak asasi hewan menyatakan bahwa hewan harus dipandang sebagaiorang,bukan benda.
Deskripsi	Hewan adalah anggota dari komunitas moral.
Pencetus awal	Jeremy Bentham(1748–1832); Henry Salt(1851–1939)
Pencetus modern	Peter Singer,Tom Regan,; Gary Francione
Teks kunci	Salt'sAnimals' Rights(1894); Singer'sAnimal Liberation(1972)
Subyek	Filsafat, etika

Hak asasi hewan,juga dikenal sebagaikebebasan hewan,adalah ide bahwa hak-hak dasar hewan non-manusia harus dianggap sederajat sebagaimana hak-hak dasar manusia.^[3]Para pendukung mendekati masalah ini dari posisi filosofis yang berbeda, mulai dari gerakanproteksionisyang dicetuskan filsufPeter Singer—dengan fokusutilitarianterhadap penderitaan dan konsekuensi, alih-alih konsep hak itu sendiri—sampai gerakanabolisionisyang dicetuskan profesor hukumGary Francione,yang menyatakan bahwa hewan hanya butuh satu hak, yaitu hak untuk tidak dijadikan benda atau properti. Meski ada berbagai macam pendekatan, mereka semua setuju bahwa hewan harus dipandang sebagaiorangnon-manusia dan anggota komunitas moral, serta tidak digunakan sebagai makanan, pakaian, subjek penelitian, atau hiburan.^[4]

Catatan kaki

^See, for example, Francione, Gary.Animals as persons.Columbia University Press, 2008, p. 1.
^"'Personhood' Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets at the Essence of Being Human",Association of American Medical Colleges, retrieved May 17, 2010; Taylor, Angus.Animals and Ethics,Broadview Press, 2003, pp 15ff.
^
Wise, Steven M."Animal Rights"Diarsipkan2008-11-18 diWayback Machine.,Encyclopædia Britannica,2007, accessed May 17, 2010.
- Also see Taylor, Angus.Animals & Ethics.Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15 ff, and in particular p. 16.
^
Taylor, Angus.Animals and Ethics.Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15ff.
- Also see"'Personhood' Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets at the Essence of Being Human",Association of American Medical Colleges, retrieved May 17, 2010.
- For the two sides of the movement, see Francione, Gary L. and Garner, Robert.The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation?.Columbia University Press, 2010; in particular see "The Abolition of Animal Exploitation" byGary Francionefor the abolitionist position (p. 1ff) and "A Defense of a Broad Animal Protectionism" byRobert Garnerfor the protectionist position (p. 103ff). A debate between Francione and Garner can be found on p. 175ff.
- For an argument against animals as property, see, for example, Steiner, Gary. Foreword in Gary Francione (ed.).Animals as persons: essays on the abolition of animal exploitation.Columbia University Press, 2008, p. ix ff.

Pranala luar

Animal Law ReviewDiarsipkan2007-02-06 diWayback Machine., Lewis & Clark Law School, accessed June 13, 2010.
Animal Law section Diarsipkan2020-03-11 diWayback Machine., The National Association for Biomedical Research, accessed June 13, 2010.
Animal Legal Defense Fund Diarsipkan2011-10-05 diWayback Machine., accessed June 13, 2010.
Animal rights history Diarsipkan2020-04-27 diWayback Machine., animalrightshistory.org, accessed June 13, 2010.
Regan, Tom.Video of "Animal Rights: An Introduction"Diarsipkan2007-03-11 diWayback Machine., Interdisciplinary Lectures on Animal Rights, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, May 24, 2006, accessed June 13, 2010.
The Center on Animal Liberation Affairs Diarsipkan2020-10-22 diWayback Machine., accessed June 13, 2010.
The Tom Regan Animal Rights archive Diarsipkan2007-04-16 diWayback Machine., North Carolina State University, accessed June 13, 2010.

Artikel bertopik hukum ini adalah sebuahrintisan.Anda dapat membantu Wikipedia denganmengembangkannya.

[1] See, for example, Francione, Gary.Animals as persons.Columbia University Press, 2008, p. 1.

[lead-2] "'Personhood' Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets at the Essence of Being Human",Association of American Medical Colleges, retrieved May 17, 2010; Taylor, Angus.Animals and Ethics,Broadview Press, 2003, pp 15ff.

[3] Wise, Steven M."Animal Rights"Diarsipkan2008-11-18 diWayback Machine.,Encyclopædia Britannica,2007, accessed May 17, 2010.
Also see Taylor, Angus.Animals & Ethics.Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15 ff, and in particular p. 16.

[4] Also see Taylor, Angus.Animals & Ethics.Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15 ff, and in particular p. 16.

[4] Taylor, Angus.Animals and Ethics.Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15ff.
Also see"'Personhood' Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets at the Essence of Being Human",Association of American Medical Colleges, retrieved May 17, 2010.

For the two sides of the movement, see Francione, Gary L. and Garner, Robert.The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation?.Columbia University Press, 2010; in particular see "The Abolition of Animal Exploitation" byGary Francionefor the abolitionist position (p. 1ff) and "A Defense of a Broad Animal Protectionism" byRobert Garnerfor the protectionist position (p. 103ff). A debate between Francione and Garner can be found on p. 175ff.

For an argument against animals as property, see, for example, Steiner, Gary. Foreword in Gary Francione (ed.).Animals as persons: essays on the abolition of animal exploitation.Columbia University Press, 2008, p. ix ff.

[6] Also see"'Personhood' Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets at the Essence of Being Human",Association of American Medical Colleges, retrieved May 17, 2010.

[7] For the two sides of the movement, see Francione, Gary L. and Garner, Robert.The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation?.Columbia University Press, 2010; in particular see "The Abolition of Animal Exploitation" byGary Francionefor the abolitionist position (p. 1ff) and "A Defense of a Broad Animal Protectionism" byRobert Garnerfor the protectionist position (p. 103ff). A debate between Francione and Garner can be found on p. 175ff.

[8] For an argument against animals as property, see, for example, Steiner, Gary. Foreword in Gary Francione (ed.).Animals as persons: essays on the abolition of animal exploitation.Columbia University Press, 2008, p. ix ff.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]