Jump to content

GLAM CSI

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
GLAM Wiki CSI - Contribution Study Initiative

GLAM Wiki CSI(Contribution Study Initiative) or GLAM CSI is a project to assess the contribution pipeline in the Wikimedia technical infrastructure for supporting cultural and heritage partnerships and projects.

Survey

[edit]

SURVEY OPEN:GLAM CSI survey for Wikimedia contributors

This survey takes approximately 15-20 minutes to complete and covers several areas, including your current participation in Wikimedia activities, the challenges you face, and tools you find most helpful. You are invited to respond on behalf of your institution, a specific project, a Wikimedia affiliate, or an individual contributor.

About

[edit]

The project examines the ongoing efforts from the Smithsonian Institution and other cultural and heritage partners to produce real-lifeuser storiesfrom various GLAM-Wiki efforts.

The report will document the needs and practices of content partners for participating in Wikimedia activities while identifying the opportunities for improvement and prototyping possible solutions, particularly on the shared focus of addressing knowledge gaps.

Gathering feedback will be done both synchronously and asynchronously. We will create a survey as an initial means of gathering a breadth of information from various stakeholders. The survey will also allow the research team to follow up with respondents to gain a deeper understanding of areas of interest.

The insights from this survey will be used to:

  • Establish focus groups for more in-depth interviews
  • Develop first draft personas, user stories and user journeys
  • Identify tools that should be mentioned as helpful in the final report
  • Diagnose gaps in tools for GLAMs

The goal is to gather the first round of feedback through March and mid-April 2024.

Contact

[edit]
  • Andrew Lih, Wikimedian at Large, Smithsonian Institution, USA -User:Fuzheado

Background

[edit]

When Wikipedia was founded in 2001, engagement between the Wikimedia community and the cultural/heritage sector was not immediate. But each year saw Wikipedia's influence grow, as it showed up in Google searches, and was being linked to by people on blogs, social media, and even legal cases.

But a question always remained:How much could you trust Wikipedia's content and its volunteer community of contributors?

Wikimania 2008 at the Library of Alexandria, Egypt

Interest from respected cultural and heritage professionals gained traction in 2008, when the annualWikimaniaconference was hosted by theLibrary of Alexandriain Egypt, signaling a shift in traditional institutions acknowledging Wikipedia's emergence as the world's foremost reference site.

In 2010, collaboration with the cultural sector took on the label "GLAM Wiki" whenLiam Wyattwas the first Wikipedian-in-residence, at the British Museum in London. These initial collaborations took the form of joint public events such as edit-a-thons for article improvement, or the uploading to Wikimedia Commons of digital images of photos, documents, or collections with their associated metadata. Because of this increased need for contribution at scale, tools to mass upload image collections from GLAM institutions were developed to go beyond the standard Upload Wizard. These included specially developed utilities such asflickr2commonsto allow "side loading" from existing license-compliant albums from users on flickr.com, or the development ofcommons:Commons:GLAMwiki Toolset Projectby Europeana and EU-based Wikimedia chapters.

The advent of Wikidata in 2012 brought GLAM Wiki collaboration to a new level, particularly with libraries working with controlled vocabularies and data taxonomies. Wikidata's support for structured data and authority control records resonated with them, resulting in Wikidata training and sessions becoming a staple at top librarian conferences such asIFLAandLD4.

In 2016, the addition of Wikidata-like capabilities to Wikimedia Commons was initiated with theStructured Data on Commonsproject. This opened up more possibilities to full collections contributions by GLAM institutions, given the much wider scope of Commons, versus the stricter notability guidelines of Wikidata and Wikipedia.

However, in 2023 there was a significant concern about the uncertainty around the direction of GLAM Wiki efforts with a number of issues, many of which were highlighted by the Wikimedians in Residence Exchange Network User Group in aGLAM manifestoreport and asession at Wikimania.Among the areas of concern were issues related to:

  • Contribution - Mass image uploading tools such asPattypanwere not being maintained, causing frustration for many GLAM partners
  • Enrichment - Uncertainty around the direction of Structured Data on Commons and the associated Commons Query Service
  • Measurement and evaluation - Many metrics tools became inoperable in 2023, leading to a number of GLAM institutions pausing their wiki efforts
Example of tools used by GLAM institutions in a Linked Open Data workflow. (From:wikidata:Wikidata:Linked open data workflow)

The report also highlighted progress: the Wikimedia movement has invested in OpenRefine, Thumbor and references for SDC during that period. However, there was overall concern about the general state of the tools as described in theWikidata:Linked open data workflow.

It is within this climate that a proposal at the end of 2023 was made to better study and capture user stories and customer journeys to guide decisions going forward, with the Smithsonian Institution leading the study, in cooperation with the GLAM wiki community.

Plans and status

[edit]

2024

[edit]

Late October

[edit]
  • A set of seven user stories have been launched, and are open for more feedback. See#Gallery.

October

[edit]

August

[edit]

July

[edit]

June

[edit]

Personas and user stories are available for review in#User stories.

April

[edit]

SURVEY OPEN:GLAM CSI survey for Wikimedia contributors

This survey takes approximately 15-20 minutes to complete and covers several areas, including your current participation in Wikimedia activities, the challenges you face, and tools you find most helpful. You are invited to respond on behalf of your institution, a specific project, a Wikimedia affiliate, or an individual contributor.

January

[edit]

Planned milestones and feedback sessions at upcoming conferences and gatherings:

  • Q1 RESEARCH
    • Identify key stakeholders for interview and feedback, with a prioritization on the creation of user stories and customer journey map. Begin identification of key tools based on Content Partnerships Hub survey from 2022, extending it to new tools and facilities.
    • March - Finalize research survey in consultation with GLAM wiki community
  • Q2 GATHER AND PROTOTYPE
    • April - European GLAM coordinators online meeting describing survey and participation
    • Start production of user stories and journey map for feedback, gather detailed data around technical contribution pipeline. Begin pilot prototyping the use of DPLA /Smithsonian metadata and content uploading on a smaller Smithsonian units.
    • May 3-6 - Wikimedia Hackathon in Tallinn, Estonia, and GLAM + AI Sauna, Helsinki, Finland
  • Q3 EVALUATE
    • Publish drafts of intermediate results for feedback from key stakeholders and Wikimedia community. Incorporate feedback and prepare report.
    • mid-June - Intermediate results published and feedback sessions with GLAM community
    • June 20, 2024 - Wiki Workshop as possible avenue for results and feedback (https://wikiworkshop.org/)
    • August 7-10, 2024 - Wikimania 2024 in Katowice, Poland, as part of the GLAM track
      • Planned presentation of user stories results and evaluate feedback from GLAM wiki community
      • Brainstorming of solutions and demonstrating prototyping directions
  • Q4 REPORT
    • Refine report and begin drafting recommendations based on feedback. Begin dissemination and discussion of results at major gatherings including Wikimania, WikiConference, or high value gatherings (emphasis on November 2024 events).
    • October 3-6, 2024 - WikiConference North America in Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
      • Presentation of final user stories for refinement
      • Test prototypes of solutions and receive feedback on possible directions
    • November 2024 - Museum Computer Network (date to be determined)
      • Potential venue for disseminating customer journey/user stories for general feedback and tool demonstration

2023

[edit]
WikiConference North America 2023 - GLAM Wiki Tools Roundtable with Selena Deckelmann and Andrew Lih

Some initial work has already been done at WikiConference North America in November 2023, with a session among GLAM wiki professionals and volunteers, and Wikimedia Foundation CPTO Selena Deckelmann. This gathering of 20-30 individuals provided good initial research for the CSI effort that helped produce some key stakeholder insights.

Sign up

[edit]

Sign up and add your usernameto be informed of developments.

User stories

[edit]
[edit]

List

[edit]

Overview

[edit]

Distribution of user stories

Outcomes

[edit]
At Wikimania, outcome of brainstorming, ranking, and sorting possible solutions to "obstacle areas." Summarized in chart below.

From the WikimaniaGlobal Wiki Meetup– Possible solutions to "obstacle areas" for Wikimedia work, ranked.

Hardest Harder Easier Easiest
GLAM council or consortium (6)

Language help: more tools for non-Roman alphabet (4)

An easy to handle surface for Wikidata queries (1)

Automated API refresh of GLAM-submitted data on Wikidata (2)

More technical support for Wikibase integrations (2)

Prioritize those tools that are easiest to use (3)

Impactful improvements to the platforms to make tooling easier (1)

Consistent branding (3)

Charge GLAMs for tech services (6)

Wiki community training in local context (4), truly multilingual (5)

Better onboarding, learning, training for partners to help them get started mapping data (2)

Layering/weighting data "official" vs contributed (5)

Start from project -> search tool (3)

Institutional "buddying up" for better understanding (4)

Training folks in tech documentation (6)

International GLAM events (3, 4)

Recognize low hanging fruit (tools and projects) (3)

Support tool developers when there are major changes (1)

Step by step recipes for institutions with entry level tasks, 'cookbook' (3) case studies (3)

Examples (case studies) of impactful reuse (5)

Ways to encourage reuse (5)

GLAM Wish List (6)

Systematic tools assessment system by quality (status) and importance (usefulness) (1)

Understand the future of Structured Data on Commons in the movement (2)

Legend:Languages and i18n•Training and documentation•Tools and development

Potential user stories

[edit]


[edit]

See also

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=GLAM_CSI&oldid=27675019"