Grants:IEG
 | This page is kept for historical interest. Any grant programs, policies, or related details mentioned may be obsolete.You can find Wikimedia Foundation's current funding programs atGrants:Start. |
- Wikimedia Grants
- Conference & Event Grants
- Rapid Funds
- Project Grants
- Simple Annual Plan Grants
- Annual Plan Grants
- Risk Assessment During COVID-19
TheProject & Event Grant (PEG)andIndividual Engagement Grant (IEG)programs are no longer active. Please read about our current grant programs onGrants:Start.
Individual Engagement Grants
Individual Engagement Grantssupport Wikimedians to complete projects that benefit the Wikimedia movement. Our focus is on experimentation for online impact.
We fund individuals or small teams to organize, build, create, research or facilitate something that enhances the work of Wikimedia’s volunteers.
apply |
review |
engage |
IEG Committee Questions about IEG |
 IdeaLab | ||
| ||||||
- step 1:Learn about the program
- step 2:Application
- step 3:Eligibility
- step 4:Community discussion
- step 5:Committee review
- step 6:Selections finalized
- step 7:Grantees announced
- step 8:Project reporting
round 2 2015 schedule
Proposals accepted: 31 August–29 September
Committee members finalized: 30 September
Community comment requested: 30 September–19 October
Committee review: 20 October – 2 November
Grantees announced: 4 December
2015Grants disbursed: December 2015 – January 2016
step 1
Proposals shouldsupport the achievement of Wikimedia'smissionandstrategic priorities.We favor high-impact requests with an intended online impact.
Individual or team of up to 4 individuals.See other grant options
Willing to provide full legal name and address.See more program rules
Able to independently complete the project.
Scoped to 6 months, with potential to renew for 6 more if need is shown.
Maximum request USD 30,000. No minimum.
Aimed at improving one or more of Wikimedia's existing websites.Creating a new wiki instead?
Technical projects should be completed independently.
Any code or other materials produced must be published and released as free and open-source.
Content-creation is not directly funded.
We select proposals based on the following criteria:
- Impact potential- Does it fit with Wikimedia's strategic priorities? Does it have potential for online impact? Can it be sustained, scaled, or adapted elsewhere after the grant ends?
- Innovation and learning- Does it take an innovative approach to solving a key problem for the Wikimedia movement? Is the potential impact greater than the risks? Can we measure success?
- Ability to execute- Can the scope be accomplished in 6 months? How realistic/efficient is the budget? Do the participants have the necessary skills/experience?
- Community engagement- Does it have a specific target community within the Wikimedia movement, and plan to engage it often? Does it have community support? Does it support diversity?
- The total amount of funding available- annually approved by the WMF Board.
step 2
Applications for Individual Engagement Grants are no longer accepted.Please consider reviewing our newerRapid GrantandProject Grantprograms for your application. Thanks!
Do you have an idea but not sure how to make it a complete proposal? Or perhaps you want to find other collaborators to work on the project. Get help turning your idea into action in theIdeaLab.
step 3
WMF grantmaking staff review proposals as they're submitted to ensure they meet theeligibility criteria.Those that do not meet the criteria are returned to draft status and applicants are notified. Those that are determined eligible are marked for committee review.
step 4
The Wikimedia community is invited to endorse proposals or discuss any concerns or questions they have on proposal talk pages.
Applicants are responsible for making relevant communities aware of their proposal as early as possible.
As soon as you draft your proposal, you should notify areas of the community (via village pump, mailing list, talk page, or other project-appropriate venues) that are most likely to be impacted or involved in your project. Community support is a factor in review, so please post a link to the notification and any relevant discussions in the section provided on your proposal, and encourage community members to post feedback on your proposal page.
step 5
The Individual Engagement Grantscommitteereviews proposals by scoring and providing feedback, and then recommends a shortlist of proposals for WMF to fund.
step 6
The staff complete due diligence on the committee's recommended shortlist of proposals and finalize the selection of grantees. If necessary, this step may include an interview of the applicant with the program head. If your proposal is selected, you'll be notified and asked to submit verifying documentation (legal name, address, etc) to WMF for final approval.
step 7
All applicants are notified of results on proposal talk pages. If your proposal is selected and approved for a grant, the WMF will contact you with a grant agreement, disbursement setup, and other details.
Grantees are announced via mailing lists, social media, and the Wikimedia blog.
step 8
Grantees submit brief monthly updates in a format of their choosing, as well as a midpoint report and final project report on-wiki.
TheWikimedia Foundation’sgrantmaking programsincrease the quantity, quality, diversity, and reach of free knowledge by supporting allied organizations and people around the world.
| Individual Engagement Grants | Participation Support | Project and Event Grants | Funds Dissemination Committee |
| Fundingindividuals and small teamsto lead time‑intensive projects. | Co-funding withWMDE,forindividual contributorsto travel to participate in events. | Funding project expenses forindividuals, groups, and organizations. | Funding annual plans and programs forWikimedia affiliate organizations. |
| Proposals acceptedtwice annually. | Proposals accepted atany time. | Proposals accepted atany time. | Proposals acceptedtwice annually. |
|
apply |
review |
engage |
IEG Committee Questions about IEG |
IdeaLab | ||
| ||||||
Open discussion and evaluation of proposals brings multiple perspectives to the selection process. Funding limits the number of grantees in each round, and proposals are carefully reviewed according toselection criteria.
The Wikimedia community's input helps WMF and the Individual Engagement Grants Committee understand if a project will be supported by the people it aims to serve.
You can get involved by reading throughopen proposalsand postingfeedback, questions, concerns, or suggestionson a proposal’s talk page. To recommend a proposal for selection, submit anendorsementin the space provided on the proposal page.
- Renewal requests
- Project/Improve 'Upload to Commons' Android App/Renewal
- IEG/A graphical and interactive etymology dictionary based on Wiktionary/Renewal
- IEG/Wikimaps Warper 2.0/Renewal
- IEG/WOW! Editing Group/Renewal
- Drafts
Please visitIdeaLabto comment on new ideas in development!
- IEG/Examining and Facilitating Global Network Sovereignty
- IEG/ideal Lab/full circle gap protocol:addressing the unknown unknowns
- IEG/encyclopédie camerounaise
- IEG/idea Lab/full circle gap protocol:addressing the unknown unknowns
- IEG/Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Nepal
- IdeaLab/Open Education Resources (OER) for Economics
- IEG/Photrographers and Wiki Commons
- IEG/La constitution haïtienne: des voeux pieux
- IEG/Ask Women to Upload to Commons
- IEG/A visual representation of the etymology of words using trees
- IEG/Almilekie
- IEG/52158321
- IEG/Wiki Tales
- IEG/منحة للطلاب بتغجيجت
- IEG/end-user personal content filtering
- IEG/Telnet
- IEG/Adao da yebba cristao
- IEG/Women are everywhere
- IEG/Modernize the Wiki Loves Monuments PA Jury Tool
- IEG/Expand offering of External links templates for GLAM entities
- IEG/Lua libs for acceptance test-driven development
- IEG/Promozione per it.Wikiversità
- IEG/Ongoing Editathon Meetups in San Diego and SoCal
- IEG/AutoresAr
- IEG/To be able to Create and easily use Gujarati Vikram Samvat based Calendar on Gu.Wikipedia.org
- IdeaLab/Global Poetry Platform
- IEG/Aprend'Erê
- IEG/Wiki illustrators
- IdeaLab/Develop an extension for building views of Wikidata in any Wikis.
- IdeaLab/Login to Edit a Page
- Proposed
No pages meet these criteria.
round 1 2016 schedule
round 2 2015 schedule
Proposals accepted: 31 August–29 September
Committee members finalized: 30 September
Community comment requested: 30 September–19 October
Committee review: 20 October – 2 November
Grantees announced: 4 December
2015Grants disbursed: December 2015 – January 2016
Some projects start from just the spark of an idea. Over time, they gather collaborators and can be turned into complete IEG proposals.
You can helpgrow ideas into action by getting involved in theIdeaLab.
We rely on a committee of volunteers from the Wikimedia community to recommend proposals for funding.
We enjoy a large committee and do not run elections. Those who are determined to meet the criteria are invited to become members during an open call period each year. Membership is for a 1-year term, which may be renewable.
To be considered for membership:
1.Review the membership criteriaand make sure you meet them.
2.Review the committee's tasksand make sure you're willing and able to fulfill them (we'll show you how!).
3.Add your name to thelist of candidates.Please include a brief statement about your background and Wikimedia involvement, demonstrating how you meet the criteria.
1.Provide feedback on grant proposals:Check on newideas,drafts and proposals,engaging in talk page discussions to help improve them and asking questions to ensure that sufficient information is provided and that goals and estimates are realistic.
2.Review finalized proposals:Read and research submissions, join aworking groupto score proposals according to rubric determined by selection criteria and give feedback to applicants.
3.Recommend proposals for funding:Recommend a shortlist of proposals for funding to WMF staff based on the available budget.
Mandatory:
- Experience with the Wikimedia movement and at least oneWikimedia project.
- Experience with some aspect of Wikimedia programmatic or project-based work, e.g. editor engagement, WikiProjects or other on-wiki organizing processes, outreach, events, partnerships, research, education, gadget or bot-building, etc.
- Ability to edit basic wiki-markup (grant proposal discussions are largely conducted on meta-wiki).
- Reasonable facility with English, for reviewing and discussing grant proposals.
- In good community- and legal- standing (not currently blocked or banned, involved in allegations of unethical financial behavior, etc).
- Availability to actively engage in the selection process during the published schedule for that round (time commitment is about 3 hours per week, plus 1 extra day for scoring).
Preferable:
- Experience leading, coordinating, or managing projects with an intended on-wiki or online impact.
- Experience handling externally provided money and working within budgets, preferably in a non-profit context.
- Experience applying for grants or working in grants programs (in the Wikimedia, academic, or wider non-profit world).
- Ability to read and write in multiple languages.
Acceptable:
- Members may apply for an Individual Engagement Grant themselves, but they will recuse themselves from reviewing proposals in the same category as their own during that round.
- Membership does not conflict with membership in other Wikimedia committees, including theGrant Advisory Committeeor the Wikimania Scholarships Committee.
|
apply |
review |
engage |
IEG Committee Questions about IEG |
IdeaLab | ||
| ||||||
This is the organizing hub for grantees. Browse current projects below to see what Individual Engagement Grantees are working on!
No pages meet these criteria.
- IEG/Enhance the ProveIt gadget
- IEG/Semi-automatically generate Categories for Vietnamese Wikipedia
- IEG/Wikidata Toolkit
- IEG/Improve 'Upload to Commons' Android App
- IEG/Wikiscan multi-wiki
- IEG/Editor Behaviour Analysis
- IEG/Senior Citizens Write in Sanskrit Wikipedia
- IEG/Proofreading semiautomatically the Catalan Wikipedia with LanguageTool
- IEG/Wikitherapy
- IEG/Wiki needs pictures
- IEG/Increase Awareness of and participation in Indic language Wikipedias in Colorado
- IEG/Wikimaps Warper 2.0
- IEG/StrepHit: Wikidata Statements Validation via References
- IEG/Growing Kannada-language Wikimedia projects with a digital library
- IEG/Editing Maithili Wikipedia
- IEG/Batch uploader for small GLAM projects
- IEG/Pan-Scandinavian Machine-assisted Content Translation
- IEG/Alt text tools
- IEG/Motivational and educational video to introduce Wikimedia
- IEG/WOW! Editing Group
- IEG/Wikipedian in Residence for Gender Equity
- IdeaLab/Full Circle Gap Protocol: Addressing the Unknown Unknowns
- IEG/WIGI: Wikipedia Gender Index
- IEG/Revision scoring as a service
- IEG/Fundación Joaquín Díaz
- IEG/WikiBrainTools
- IEG/Automated Notability Detection
- IEG/Digitization of Important Libraries Book Catalog in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana
- IEG/WikiProject X
- IEG/Health images for all
- IEG/A graphical and interactive etymology dictionary based on Wiktionary
- IEG/Lua libs for behavior-driven development
- IEG/Pronunciation Recording (Finish incomplete GSoC project)
- IEG/Senior Citizens Write Wikipedia
- IEG/Tools for Armenian Wikisource and beyond
- IEG/Promoting Wikivoyage
- IEG/WikiTrack
- IEG/Women and Wikipedia
- IEG/Medicine Translation Project Community Organizing
- IEG/Open Access Reader
- IEG/Women Scientists Workshop Development
- IEG/Mbazzi Village writes Wikipedia
- IEG/Wikimaps Atlas
No pages meet these criteria.
- IEG/Making telugu content accessible
- IEG/Art+Feminism Editathon training materials and network building
- IEG/Reimagining Wikipedia Mentorship
- IEG/What is about - C'est quoi. A series of communication tools about Wikipedia. Cameroon pilot project
- IEG/Visual editor- gadgets compatibility
- IEG/The Wikipedia Library
- IEG/Replay Edits
- IEG/Elaborate Wikisource strategic vision
- IEG/The Wikipedia Adventure
- IEG/Build an effective method of publicity in PRChina
- IEG/Consolidate wikiArS to involve art schools
- IEG/MediaWiki data browser
round 1 2016 schedule
round 2 2015 schedule
Proposals accepted: 31 August–29 September
Committee members finalized: 30 September
Community comment requested: 30 September–19 October
Committee review: 20 October – 2 November
Grantees announced: 4 December
2015Grants disbursed: December 2015 – January 2016
Welcome, new grantees! Please read everything below to learn how to launch your project, learnhow payments work,become familiar withyour reporting responsibilities,and what to do ifyou need more time.Please review theprogram rules.Then follow the instructions to get your project started!
- Step 1 - Grant agreement
Before the grant can be approved, grantees mustconfirm the terms of the grant and provide their full legal name, address and date of birthfor everyone listed on the bank account to which the grant will be disbursed. A request for this information will be emailed to you by WMF staff.
- Step 2 - Project page setup
Your grant proposal will now become a living plan for your project. Staff will update your proposal page with navigation to additional pages you'll need for documenting your project once it begins. Please visit your proposal anduse the buttons to create all of your project pages.You should keep these pages up-to-date as much as possible as your project progresses. This documentation will help everyone to share in your progress and experiences over the course of the grant.
The total amount of your approved budget is listed in your grant agreement, and the approved use of funds for each line-item is detailed on your project finances page. We know that some details and expenses may change as your project progresses. That is ok, as long as you keep us updated and request approval for significant changes during the grant period, as follows:
- Please use the button provided on your project finances page to request approval for any changes to the planned use of funds as your project progresses. Staff will reply there to confirm approval or request additional information.
- Approval is required to make changes to any budget line-item with a variance greater than 20% for budgets of up to US$15,000, and 10% for budgets more than US$15,000 (or the equivalents in foreign currency).
Grant disbursements are made to the grantee’s account using a payment processing service or wire transfer as agreed upon in the grant agreement. Disbursements can take up to 30 days to be received. Remember that you are responsible for any tax associated with your receipt of the grant funds in your country.
Your disbursement will come in 2 equal installments:
- After you sign and return the grant agreement.
- After your midpoint report is received and approved.
Grantees are responsible for tracking and documenting use of grant funds as follows:
- Receipts or other documentation must be kept by the grantee for reporting and review purposes, and grantees should followWMF Grants guidelines for documenting project expenses.
- Copies of receipts and documentation should be scanned and emailed toIEGrants
wikimedia.orgwhen the project report is submitted to Meta-Wiki. - Any funds that are not used in agreement with the approved budget must be returned to WMF along with the final grant report, within 30 days after the end of the grant. Grantees should follow theWMF Grants program instructions for returning funds.
Our focus with reporting is to share lessons and insights gained from the project and to measure impact. Lessons learned through these reports will be used to share best practices with the broader Wikimedia community. Reports must be published on Meta-Wiki as part of the grantee's project pages. They will be reviewed by IEG staff within 30 days of submission, and may be commented on by staff, committee members, and the community. To be accepted, reports must be complete and accurate.
A brief project update is requested each month to share your progress and lessons learned along the way. These updates should be created and linked from your project's progress page on Meta-Wiki at the end of each month.
The format these updates take is up to you. Aim for something suited to your project that you’ll enjoy doing!
Monthly update formats:
- on-wiki newsletter or journal
- blog post
- YouTube video
- podcast
- annotated product demos
- suggest something else, we're likely to approve it as long as it shares what you're doing or learning along the way!
The Head of Individual Engagement Grants will schedule a monthly check-in with each project team, to assess and support needs as a project progresses.
A midpoint report demonstrating progress and lessons learned thus far must be submitted on Meta-Wiki. This report is is due within 15 days after three months of the grant's start date.
To create your midpoint report, use the "Start your Midpoint" button from your IEGrant project page.
A final report on the project’s outcomes, lessons, and impact assessment as measured against the project's targets and goals, must be submitted on Meta-Wiki. This report is is due within 30 days after the grant's end date.
To create your final report, use the "Start your Final" button from your IEGrant project page.
Grantees are encouraged to attend Wikimania or other movement gatherings to present findings to the community, in addition to providing the above written documentation.
To help the WMF learn about and improve its grantmaking programs, grantees are asked to complete occasional surveys during and after the grant period and to participate in longer-term follow-up interviews.
We know that occasionally something happens and more time may be needed to complete your project than expected. That is ok, as long as you keep us updated and request approval for significant changes.
If your final report is due but you need more time, please use the button provided on your timeline page to request an extension. Staff will reply there to confirm approval or request additional information.
Projects that demonstrate strong potential for impact and need for further funding may beconsideredfor a renewal grant of six additional months.
- If you see need for continued funding, discuss this with the your program officer or other advisors during project check-ins.
- In the final grant report, you'll find a button to submit a renewal request. This should be created as soon after you submit the final report as possible.
- Renewals should include a plan for the second six months, with clear scope, budget, and measures of success.
- Staff will reply on the renewal request to confirm approval or request additional information.
contact us
Visitwikimediafoundation.orgfor more information about the Wikimedia Foundation.
Seriously, check out theIdeaLab,where experienced Wikimedians can help you develop your idea and your application.
We have a page for that! We like to keep discussion in public so that everyone can benefit. Ask on theIndividual Engagement Grants question page.
Sign upto have our newsletter delivered your talk page.
Write toIEGrantswikimedia.organd our staff will get back to you.
program rules
- You are welcome to submit a proposal in any language. If you plan to submit in a language other than English, we'd encourage you to complete your proposal as early as possible to ensure time for translation. If you have questions about submitting a grant request in a language other than English, pleasecontact usto discuss.
- IEG grants are considered taxable income in the US for residents of that country, and may be taxable under local laws for those residing in other countries.Grantees are solely responsible for paying all taxes on the grant amount,and are encouraged to learn about tax regulations in their country before accepting a grant.
- Each individual on a project team is considered a grantee and must sign an individual grant agreement and receive their own portion of the grant disbursement. However, reporting should be completed together as a team.
- Grants can be disbursed in the local currency or US dollars. To prevent losses incurred from wire transfer fees, currency exchange, or other bank fees, it is recommended that you document and include your expected loss in the budget of your original grant proposal.
- Grants are generally disbursed in two lump sums: half at the start of the grant, approximately three to four weeks after all disbursement details have been received by WMF, and half on the grantee's completion of a midpoint project report.
- Grantee's legal name and address do not need to be disclosed publicly, but if selected to receive funds, valid government-issued photo identification and other verification details must be provided to WMF.
- As a US-based funder, WMF must comply with the Office of Foreign Assets Control. Proposers are encouraged to checkthis listfor information about restrictions for their country, and contact us if you have questions.
- Grantees under the age of 18 must have a legal guardian acting as fiscal sponsor to sign agreements and receive disbursements on behalf of the grantee.
- Grants are intended to support volunteers in the Wikimedia movement. Paid WMF staff, Wikimedia chapters and thematic organizations, and WMF grantee organizations are not eligible for these grants. In occasional cases where the committee may decide to recommend a grant to a community member who is currently engaged as a contractor with one of these organizations, the contractor's engagement must not be for more than 20 hours/week.
- If a grant request includes travel, please review and adhere to Wikimedia Foundation'sTravel Policy.