Bangsang estadu
Ingbangsang estadu(nation state) metung yangestadungmangilala king sarili nang kukwa king kayangpangalehitimung pampulitikaking kayang pamagsilbi antimong magsariling talapagdala ningbangsaantimongmagsariling labwad.[1]Ing estadu metung yangpampulitikaampongpang-geopoliticala bage; ing bangsa metung yangpangkulturaampong/opanglahingbage. Ing katayang "bangsang estadu" mangabaldugan yang mitutulid la reng adwa king metung a lugal mitatabnu la reng aliwa king metung a lugal. Milyari ing pamanalkus da reng bangsang estadu kareng miayaliwang panaun kareng miayaliwang dake ning yatu, oneng megi yang makababo o dominanting uri ning pamag-organisa ning estadu.
Malyari yang ikumpara o pakiyanti, ampong piyaliwa, ing konseptu na ampo ing tutu nang kabilyan ning bangsang estadu karengmultinational state(‘’multinational state’’),city state(‘’lakanbalen a estadu’’), The concept and actuality of the nation state can be compared and contrasted with that of themultinational state,city state,[2][3][4]imperyu(‘’empire’’),pamiugnayan(‘’confederation’’), ampong aliwa pang porma o alkus ningestadu,a malyaring misanib. Ing pekamaulagang pamiyaliwa kareng aliwang alkus, ya pin ing pamangilala ning forms with which it may overlap. The key distinction from the other forms is the identification of apeople(‘’people’’) king metung apolity(estadu o dake na niti).
Dalerayan[mag-edit|alilan ya ing pikuwanan]
- ↑Such a definition is a working one: "All attempts to develop terminological consensus aroundnationresulted in failure ", concludesTishkov, Valery (2000). "Forget the 'nation': post-nationalist understanding of nationalism".Ethnic and Racial Studies23(4): 625–650 [p. 627].Connor, Walker (1978). "A Nation is a Nation, is a State, is an Ethnic Group, is a…".Ethnic and Racial Studies1:377–400.Discusses the impresion surrounding the characters ofnation,state,nation state,andnationalismConnor, who gave the termethnonationalismwide currency, discusses the tendency to confuse nation and state, and to treat all states as nation states. Sheila L. Crouche,Globalization and belongingdiscusses "The Definitional Dilemma" pp85ff.
- ↑Peter Radan (2002).The break-up of Yugoslavia and international law.Psychology Press.ISBN 978-0-415-25352-9.Retrieved on25 November 2010.
- ↑Alfred Michael Boll (2007).Multiple nationality and international law.Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.ISBN 978-90-04-14838-3.Retrieved on25 November 2010.
- ↑Daniel Judah Elazar (1998).Covenant and civil society: the constitutional matrix of modern democracy.Transaction Publishers.ISBN 978-1-56000-311-3.Retrieved on25 November 2010.
Karagdagang babasan[mag-edit|alilan ya ing pikuwanan]
- Anderson, Benedict.1991.Imagined Communities.ISBN 0-86091-329-5.
- Luca Bellocchio,Fine dello stato o stato senza fine?,Democrazia e Diritto,No. 4, 2005, 197-206
- Colomer, Josep M..2007.Great Empires, Small Nations. The Uncertain Future of the Sovereign State.ISBN 0-415-43775-X.
- Gellner, Ernest (1983).Nations and Nationalism.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.ISBN 0-8014-1662-0.
- Hobsbawm, Eric J. (1992).Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality.2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.ISBN 0-521-43961-2.
- Khan, Ali (1992).The Extinction of Nation states
- Renan, Ernest.1882."Qu'est-ce qu'une nation?"( "What is a Nation?")
- Malesevic, Sinisa (2006).Identity as Ideology: Understanding Ethnicity and NationalismNew York: Palgrave.
- Smith, Anthony D. (1986).The Ethnic Origins of NationsLondon: Basil Blackwell. pp 6–18.ISBN 0-631-15205-9.
- White, Philip L. (2006). "Globalization and the Mythology of the Nation State," In A.G.Hopkins, ed.Global History: Interactions Between the Universal and the LocalPalgrave Macmillan, pp. 257–284.[1]
Suglung palwal[mag-edit|alilan ya ing pikuwanan]
- From Paris to Cairo: Resistance of the UnacculturatedArchivedDisyembri 9, 2010 at theWayback Machine(Identity and the Nation state)