Usapan:Mehiko
 | Ito ang pahinang usapan upang talakayin angMehiko.Mangyaring panatilihin angkagandahang-asalat iwasan ang paglalagay ng anumang bagay na wala namang kinalaman sa nasabing paksa.
Pakilagay lamang ang inyong mensahe sa ibaba kasunod ng inyong lagda sa pamamagitan ng paglalagay ngapat na bantas (~~~~)kung gagamit ka ng wikitext. Kung hindi ka pamilyar sa wikitext,pindutin na lamang ito para magsimula ng bagong paksang mapag-uusapan.Maraming salamat po. Baguhan sa Wikipedia? Makatutulong sa iyo ang mga pahinang ito:Wikipedia:Patungkolatmagtanong upang matugunan. |
México DF
[baguhin ang wikitext]The city ofMéxicohas existed long before evenNueva Españawas established. It was only in 1821 that this territory, after gaining independence, adopted as its ownthe name of the city.And, especially owing to Tagalog’s Hispanic heritage, it is only natural that it preserve the original spellings of the names of cities in the Hispanic world. Buenos Aires remainsBuenos Airesand doesn’t becomeBwenos Ayres;same with Xochimilco andSyotsimilkoand Puerto Williams andPwerto Vilyams/Gwilyams.—Život12:08, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
- Should we also move this article toMexicoto match? --Bluemask(usap tayo)16:47, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
- That wouldn’t be necessary. We could however clip “Lungsod ng” off the title of the article. Finnish, Estonian, Icelandic, and others all have their own spellings of the country’s name (which is only natural) while retainingMéxico(without-n kaupunki“city” or the Estonian and Icelandic equivalents) as the name of the city. —Život17:30, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
- What I mean is moving the country article toMexico.--Bluemask(usap tayo)17:36, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
- Sorry. What I meant to say was that instead of doing that we could just drop the “Lungsod ng” off the title of theLungsod ng Méxicoarticle. I do not see a need to haveidenticalspellings for the city and the country, the former which gave the latter its name (instead of the other way around). —Život17:53, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
- Since one gave its name to another, should we follow it here (on tl-wiki)? For consistency's sake? --Bluemask(usap tayo)17:59, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
- That probably won’t be necessary, or even desirable. I mean, we won’t call NovosibirskBagong Siberyanojust so it would be consistent with Siberya, right? —Život18:07, 30 September 2005 (UTC)