Research governance, ethics and integrity
Goldsmiths has structures that ensure the quality and impact of our research and its environment.
Primary page content
Governing committees and boards
Reporting to the Academic Board, the Research and Enterprise Committee (REC) is a key strategic committee responsible for all aspects of research and enterprise, including research training, research ethics and integrity, and knowledge exchange/transfer activities in partnership with external organisations and businesses.
The Research Ethics Sub-Committee and Postgraduate Research Board are responsible for particular aspects of REC’s overall remit and report to it.
Research ethics
The ethical scrutiny of research conducted by academic staff at Goldsmiths is the responsibility of the Research Ethics Sub-Committee (RESC). RESC scrutinises applications for ethical approval in order to ascertain that the research abides by both general and disciplinary principles and standards of research ethics.
Such principles relate to, for example, harm to human participants, independence of researchers, integrity of research, fidelity to verifiable knowledge, consent to research and use of data, and rights to privacy, confidentiality and anonymity.
Academic researchers have ethical obligations to the people, species and materials they study, to the stakeholders with whom they work, and to the environment within which the research is situated. Such obligations are not only based in the ‘here and now’ but are also oriented to the possibility of future knowledge production by others.
All research projects – that are concerned with living (or recently deceased) beings or with data and materials derived from such beings or that might unduly affect the environment and hence change the lives of beings within that environment - require ethical approval.
Ethical approval applications related to research projects led by undergraduate, postgraduate and PhD students are managed by relevant academic departments. Oversight is provided by RESC.
Research integrity
Goldsmiths is a signatory to theUniversities UK Concordat to Support Research Integrityand has adopted theUK Research and Integrity Office’s Code of Practice for Researchas its institutional Code of Practice on Research Ethics and Integrity.
The Chair of Goldsmiths Research Ethics Sub-Committee (RESC), currently Dr Panagiotis PentarisPanagiotis.Pentaris(@gold.ac.uk),acts as first point of contact for anyone wanting more information on matters of research integrity and as a confidential liaison for whistle-blowers or anyone else wishing to raise concerns about research integrity.
The formal procedures for dealing with allegations related to research integrity are set out inGoldsmiths Research Misconduct Procedure (PDF)andGoldsmiths Research Misconduct Flowchart (PDF)
- Research Integrity Annual Statement 2022-23 (PDF)
- Research Integrity Annual Statement 2021-22 (PDF)
- Research Integrity Annual Statement 2020-21 (PDF)
- Research Integrity Annual Statement 2019-20 (PDF)
- Research Integrity Annual Statement 2018-19 (PDF)
- Research Integrity Annual Statement 2017-18 (PDF)
- Research Integrity Annual Statement 2016-17 (PDF)
- Research Integrity Annual Statement 2015-16 (PDF)
- Research Integrity Annual Statement 2014-15 (PDF)
Open access
Our statement on open access reflects our unique and specialist nature and its research-intensive status:Goldsmiths statement on open access (PDF)