Matthew's Reviews> The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks
by
by
![16254355](https://images.gr-assets.com/users/1464987365p2/16254355.jpg)
This is a very powerful and informative story. Also, with the history of personal freedoms, civil rights, and right to privacy/requiring consent, this is a very important books. I am not sure the details about the science involved in the story will appeal to all. Just the same as how those who are here for the science may be disinterested in the background stories of the people involved. But, if you think you will like one of the other, I don’t think the one you don’t care for will be distracting.
With that in mind, I will continue with the statement that it really is two books: the science and the people. First, the background of cell and tissue research in the last 100 years is intriguing and to hear about all of the advances and why Henretta Lacks was key to them is fascinating. Second, the background of not only the Lacks family, but also others who have had their tissues/cells used for research without permission, gives a lot of food for thought. Almost every medical advancement, and many scientific advancements, in the past 60 years are because of Henrietta Lacks. But, questions about the consent she gave, what she understood about her cells being used, and how much the family has benefited are all questioned and discussed. It really hits hard to think that you may have no control over parts of you once they are no longer part of your body. Also, the fiscal and research ramifications of giving people more rights over their body tissue/cells really creates a huge Catch-22. As I had surgery earlier this year that involved some tissue being removed for analysis, it started to make me wonder what I signed on all those forms and if my cells might still be out there being used for research.
The only part of the book that kind of dragged for me was the time that the author spent with the family late in the book. After listening to an interview with the author it was surprising to hear that this part of the book may have been her original focus (how the family has dealt with the revelations surrounding the use of their mother’s cells), but to me it kind of dragged and got repetitive. I don’t think it is bad and others may find it interesting, it just was what brought down my interest in the story a little bit.
If you like science-based stories, medical-based stories, civil/personal rights history, and/or just love a decent non-fiction, I think this book is very worth checking out.
With that in mind, I will continue with the statement that it really is two books: the science and the people. First, the background of cell and tissue research in the last 100 years is intriguing and to hear about all of the advances and why Henretta Lacks was key to them is fascinating. Second, the background of not only the Lacks family, but also others who have had their tissues/cells used for research without permission, gives a lot of food for thought. Almost every medical advancement, and many scientific advancements, in the past 60 years are because of Henrietta Lacks. But, questions about the consent she gave, what she understood about her cells being used, and how much the family has benefited are all questioned and discussed. It really hits hard to think that you may have no control over parts of you once they are no longer part of your body. Also, the fiscal and research ramifications of giving people more rights over their body tissue/cells really creates a huge Catch-22. As I had surgery earlier this year that involved some tissue being removed for analysis, it started to make me wonder what I signed on all those forms and if my cells might still be out there being used for research.
The only part of the book that kind of dragged for me was the time that the author spent with the family late in the book. After listening to an interview with the author it was surprising to hear that this part of the book may have been her original focus (how the family has dealt with the revelations surrounding the use of their mother’s cells), but to me it kind of dragged and got repetitive. I don’t think it is bad and others may find it interesting, it just was what brought down my interest in the story a little bit.
If you like science-based stories, medical-based stories, civil/personal rights history, and/or just love a decent non-fiction, I think this book is very worth checking out.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
July 18, 2016
– Shelved
July 18, 2016
– Shelved as:
to-read
August 1, 2018
–
Started Reading
August 1, 2018
– Shelved as:
2018
August 1, 2018
– Shelved as:
biography
August 1, 2018
– Shelved as:
digital
August 1, 2018
– Shelved as:
library
August 1, 2018
– Shelved as:
non-fiction
August 9, 2018
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-23 of 23 (23 new)
date
newest »
![Down arrow](https://s.gr-assets.com/assets/down_arrow-1e1fa5642066c151f5e0136233fce98a.gif)
message 1:
by
Marvin
(new)
Aug 03, 2018 09:32AM
![Marvin MenjÃvar](https://images.gr-assets.com/users/1521404944p1/77149484.jpg)
reply
|
flag
![Matthew](https://images.gr-assets.com/users/1464987365p1/16254355.jpg)
Pretty good! Maybe not quite my favorite, but still very good!
![Matthew](https://images.gr-assets.com/users/1464987365p1/16254355.jpg)
Interesting - pretty much the exact opposite for me. But, that is where what you might connect to most comes in to play.
![Cheri](https://images.gr-assets.com/users/1649628205p1/106692.jpg)