Anne 's Reviews> Daniel Deronda

Daniel Deronda by George Eliot
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
2967061
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: 1001-books, jewish, classics, 2011

Eliot is a master of characterization and uses this gift well in exploring two important themes in English society. The first and most unique is that of antisemitism in late 19th Century English life, as well as the beginnings of Zionism. The second theme is altruism vs. egotism. Too verbose and tangential at times, but otherwise a hugely ambitious and successful social novel.

.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Daniel Deronda.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

December 6, 2009 – Shelved
April 22, 2011 – Shelved as: 1001-books
September 11, 2011 – Shelved as: jewish
September 30, 2011 – Started Reading
October 1, 2011 –
5.0%
October 4, 2011 –
15.0%
October 11, 2011 –
30.0%
October 17, 2011 –
35.0%
October 18, 2011 –
43.0%
October 18, 2011 –
50.0%
October 21, 2011 –
55.0%
October 29, 2011 –
70.0%
October 31, 2011 –
80.0%
November 2, 2011 –
95.0%
November 3, 2011 –
100.0%
November 3, 2011 – Shelved as: classics
November 3, 2011 – Finished Reading
July 25, 2022 – Shelved as: 2011

Comments Showing 1-24 of 24 (24 new)

dateDown arrow newest »

message 1: by Anne (new) - rated it4stars

Anne Well, yes and no. I'm 1/3 through. I'm not captivated by it (yet?), but I like it. I'll let you know how I feel about it when I'm done. I'm reading it with the Victorians group. Discussion starts today. I chose to read it mostly because the title character (and another) is Jewish. That's highly unusual Victorian novel. So far, Deronda doesn't even know that he is Jewish. To be fair, the novel only starts talking about his young life at the 20% mark. He's introduced briefly at the beginning and then another character takes over for a long time while he's offstage, so to speak. (That's a lot more info than you needed when a simple "yes" or "no" would have sufficed. Ha.)


message 2: by Anne (new) - rated it4stars

Anne I think you have to at least read some of it to get the flavor of the writing. It's really not a must-read (so far), but I'll fill you in if anything happens. So far, zilch.


message 3: by Wendy (new) - added it

Wendy Despite your tepid recommendation Anne, I think I may give this one a try at some point. I'm intrigued by the Jewish angle in Victorian fiction.


message 4: by Wendy (new) - added it

Wendy Holy smokes -- it's 800+ pages long?!!!! I reserved the audio version instead of the book. Listening counts sa reading it, right?


message 5: by Anne (new) - rated it4stars

Anne Wendy, do the audio. The language is very flowery and certain characters do like to go on and on.


message 6: by Anne (new) - rated it4stars

Anne Gaeta1 wrote: "So you gave it 5 stars after a somewhat lukewarm start. What changed your mind? (I read it is college and the narrative was too fractured for me--at least back then)."

Gaeta, this book is a very hard for me to rate. I've been going from 3-5 while reading it. 3 in terms of my level of enjoyment and the fact that the language is so flowery and the character and the narrator can go on and on and on. It gets annoying. If I were rating a modern novel it would get a 3 for that. But considering that it's a Victorian novel, one just has to expect that kind of thing (tho not always, thank god) and to be patient. I find the fault in myself and not the novel. I think she is brilliant at characterization. Most of all, she was very brave taking on the issue English anti-semitism and making her title character a Jew. There are other Jews as well; a lot of erudite talk on Jewish topics (not sure if erudite is the word, but I can't think of a better one at the moment). There were secondary themes of importance which she handled well, I thought. So, I gave the book 5 stars.


message 7: by Anne (new) - rated it4stars

Anne Wendy wrote: "Despite your tepid recommendation Anne, I think I may give this one a try at some point. I'm intrigued by the Jewish angle in Victorian fiction."

I think it's worthwhile for that reason alone. That's why I read it. It is long, so audio is a good choice.


Cynthia Anne your review goes straight to the heart of this novel. I know it's not her best book but I love DD. Did you see the BBC production? I loved that too.


message 9: by Anne (new) - rated it4stars

Anne Thank you, Cynthia. I did see the BBC production. Thankfully I'd forgotten it so I wasn't "watching the movie" while reading the book. Now I want to see the movie again.


message 10: by Sue (new) - rated it4stars

Sue This is one I really know nothing about. I have a couple of Eliot's ahead of it on my read/re-read plan. Maybe someday.


message 11: by Anne (last edited Nov 07, 2011 03:38AM) (new) - rated it4stars

Anne Thanks for the "like" Sue. This book is a commitment and not her best, but I was really interested in the Jewish angle.


message 12: by Sue (new) - rated it4stars

Sue I see that and it is interesting that she took that on at that time. Do you have any idea how that was accepted by critics in her day.


message 13: by Anne (new) - rated it4stars

Anne I did read something about it. I think the book was received very negatively by the public. Not sure about the critics. I'll see if I can find the article I read.


message 14: by Sue (new) - rated it4stars

Sue She was brave but I guess I knew that to some degree.


message 15: by Anne (new) - rated it4stars

Anne Here's an article about her and the book:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/books...


message 16: by Sue (new) - rated it4stars

Sue Thanks Anne. Very interesting.


message 17: by Anne (new) - rated it4stars

Anne Isn't it? She was a woman ahead of her time.


message 18: by Sue (new) - rated it4stars

Sue I must read more.


message 19: by Anne (new) - rated it4stars

Anne I'm watching the movie now. It's excellent.


Stacey B I read this long time ago; only small pieces are coming back to me. Im glad you enjoyed this classic.


message 21: by Lisa (NY) (new)

Lisa (NY) I've been thinking about reading this. Did you listen to it?


Stacey B Lisa wrote: "I've been thinking about reading this. Did you listen to it?"

Lisa, I'm so sorry to intrude, but I can't tell if you were asking me or Anne. On the off chance you were, I read it. It's not a short book, you may want to listen to it.


message 23: by Anne (new) - rated it4stars

Anne Lisa wrote: "I've been thinking about reading this. Did you listen to it?"

No, I read it on a kindle.


message 24: by Anne (new) - rated it4stars

Anne Stacey B wrote: "I read this long time ago; only small pieces are coming back to me. Im glad you enjoyed this classic."

I actually read this in 2011. I can only recall small pieces of the book as well. I remember the TV series/movie better.


back to top