38
Metascore
35 reviews · Provided byMetacritic.com
- 75Charlotte ObserverLawrence ToppmanCharlotte ObserverLawrence Toppman(Ford and Thomas) give Random Hearts muscle when the story turns flabby, spine where it sags, wings where it threatens to stay earthbound.
- 50Los Angeles TimesKenneth TuranLos Angeles TimesKenneth TuranThe film's underlying concept is so irredeemably screwy and far-fetched that no amount of fine work can hope to make it convincing.
- 50Film.comJohn HartlFilm.comJohn HartlNot a conventional love story, and perhaps it's not a love story at all. After more than two hours, you're left wondering what it is.
- 50Philadelphia InquirerDesmond RyanPhiladelphia InquirerDesmond RyanSorely needs the injection of skepticism - a quality that would have been even more useful when Pollack was mulling over doing Random Hearts in the first place.
- The film confines them to an affair that is the sexual equivalent of Easy Listening.
- 42Seattle Post-IntelligencerPaula NechakSeattle Post-IntelligencerPaula NechakA sloppily scripted film that contains a silly and superfluous subplot about a crooked cop.
- 40L.A. WeeklyElla TaylorL.A. WeeklyElla TaylorHas spread itself so thin between plot, subplots and great scads of floppy pop-psych, it has nothing else to do but lie down and die of exhaustion.
- 40TNT RoughCutChristopher BrandonTNT RoughCutChristopher BrandonIt risks the believability factor for anyone who's ever been cheated on or lost a loved one.
- 30Chicago ReaderJonathan RosenbaumChicago ReaderJonathan RosenbaumHumorless, lugubrious, and interminable.
- 25San Francisco ChronicleEdward GuthmannSan Francisco ChronicleEdward GuthmannHollywood hit-making at its efficient, formulaic worst.