User reviews

All in all, a solid stage production of Macbeth.

The good stuff: 1. Excellent use of lighting. 2. Cyrus Lane's performance as the porter - played with comic gusto. The best I've seen, despite verging on anachronism (which you almost have to do if you break the 4th wall to a 21st century audience) 3. Antoine Yared's performance as Malcolm - Malcolm almost always ends up being rather forgettable - he doesn't have many lines, and even the ones he does have are often cut (because directors don't know what to do with the Macduff/Malcolm interview, for example). Yared's makes Malcolm come alive - I though his reaction to Duncan's death especially moving. 4. The scenes with the witches are clever without reaching for novelty. The sword fights are well choreographed and, true to the play, both Duncan and Macbeth die offstage. 5. Krystin Pellerin's performance as Lady Macbeth, while not brilliant, is nevertheless consistently strong.

The not-so-good: 1. Sad to say, Ian Lake does not impress as Macbeth - he portrays him as more or less a young meathead, especially in the beginning. To my mind he bungles the early monologues and soliloquies that are supposed to show the depth of Macbeth's character as he struggles earnestly with his own conscience. Lake's portrayal of post-murder Macbeth is creditable, although his teary "Tomorrow and tomorrow" soliloquy is only so-so.

'Macbeth', known too as the Scottish play (have also heard Verdi's opera coined the Scottish opera), is one of my favourite Shakespeare plays, with some of Shakespeare's most deservedly famous characters and lines/solliloquies. It is one of his most quotable/oft-quoted plays and one of his most accessible to study in schools, from personal experience and studying it twice (no other Shakespeare play had me studying it more than once at school, though 'Twelfth Night' was close).

This production of 'Macbeth' is another winner from Stratford. Not one of the best productions of the play seen or quite my definition of great, but it has plenty to love about it and the best aspects are outstanding. Being on the whole very well acted, staged and designed. Did have reservations about one crucial components in the early stages of the production that did improve quite a bit later on. Not an outstanding production, but a very, very good one.

It looks great for one thing. It is suitably darkly ominous without taking the austerity and grimness to extremes, so it never looks cheap or ugly. Having seen a few productions of 'Macbeth' that did do that and it was not a good sight at all. Liked the intimacy of the filming, though it does very well with not making the drama too static or too closed up. The music has a spookiness that fits very nicely, without being over-scored or too much like a cheap horror film. Shakespeare's text is as emotionally complex and powerful as ever, and it is no wonder as to why it is quoted so often. Plus it is very faithful and complete, which is a plus for those that don't like abridgements.

Furthermore, this 'Macbeth' is very well staged and full to the brim with atmosphere. The interaction between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth at its best, like when they conspire, scintillates and unsettles, while the combat manages to not be clumsy in the slightest and quite exciting even. Was surprised at how creative some of it was, and how so much was made of a small space. A big standout being the genuinely creepy and surprisingly grisly "double double toil and trouble" scene, have never seen that scene staged in this way. The staging still manages to be loyal to the text while having new touches done in good taste and not feeling irrelevant.

On the whole, the production is very well performed. Krystin Pellerin is an imperious and at her best blood-curdling Lady Macbeth, quite the manipulative schemer. We also have a noble Banquo, a poignant Macduff, a fun Porter and finally a Malcolm that isn't underwritten or easy to forget. Not to mention genuinely scary witches, rather than ones that are unintentionally silly, stereotypical or where the interpretations miss the point. They are very mysterious too.

Was a lot more mixed on Ian Lake as Macbeth, have to agree there sadly. To me, an uneven Macbeth (like Lake's) or a bad one is a big problem with any production of the play and it is thanks to everything else being so brilliant that the production still gets a very high score and review. Lake does indeed get a lot better later on, he is believable as a co-conspirator and as a more ambitious ruler (such as in the banquet scene, a scene staged better than most productions, and his reaction to Lady Macbeth's death). He is a lot less convincing though in the early stages of the play and pre-the murder where he shows a tortured side, where he comes over as uncomfortable and bland. Macbeth's conflicted feelings in the "is there a dagger I see before me" speech have been much more powerful in other productions, whereas it sounded not always certain.

Did think too that the momentum did dull in the early Macbeth solo monologues.

In summary, very good with many fantastic things but also an uneven Macbeth. 8/10.

I just saw Macbeth on the CBC and everyone was just wonderful in this Stratford Festival production including Krystin Pellerin who portrayed Lady Macbeth.

Never have I seen a better production of Macbeth. I'm hopeful that someday I can get out to the Stratford Festival and see at least one play.

I would love to support the festival and make sure it keeps running for many generations to come. It would be a shame if the festival were to discontinue because the arts are so important. And also there needs to be a place where every actor can go and get some stage experience that they need.

Thanks.