Talk:Q1348305
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription —erratum(Q1348305)
description:published correction to a previous publication
- Useful links:
- View it!– Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “erratum” claims and statements.Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, seeWikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- erratum(Q1348305)
- publication(Q732577)
- correction(Q1414531)
- written work(Q47461344)
- declarative sentence(Q474328)
- erratum(Q1348305)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
erratum⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
How should we use this item for scientific articles?
[edit]When we stumble on a scientific article that is anerratum(Q1348305),e.g.,Erratum to: Depicted serving size: cereal packaging pictures exaggerate serving sizes and promote overserving(Q42315459),then how should we tag it? Withinstance of(P31)orgenre(P136)or something else. (Note there is alsocorrigendum / erratum(P2507)which can be used for the item describing the corrected article). —Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen)(talk)13:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
The Source MetaData WikiProject does not exist. Please correct the name.
- How about retracted papers.. They are even more noxious. Thanks,GerardM(talk)15:27, 27 November 2017 (UTC)